Objective: To introduce and discuss implementation strategy for the Complete Cochlear Implant Care (CCIC) model, a highly-coordinated cochlear implant (CI) care delivery model requiring a single on-site visit for preoperative workup, surgery, and postoperative programming. Study Design: Prospective, nonrandomized, two-arm clinical trial. Setting: Tertiary referral CI center. Patients: Adults who meet audiologic criteria for cochlear implantation. Interventions: Cochlear implantation, coordinated care delivery, including remote programming. Main outcome measures: Care delivery model feasibility and process implementation. Results: Patients determined to be likely CI candidates based on routine audiometry are eligible for enrollment. The CCIC model uses telemedicine and electronic educational materials to prepare patients for same-day on-site consultation with CI surgery, same or next-day activation, and postoperative remote programming for 12 months. Implementation challenges include overcoming inertia related to the implementation of a new clinical workflow, whereas scalability of the CCIC model is limited by current hardware requirements for remote programming technology. A dedicated CCIC process coordinator is critical for overcoming obstacles in implementation and process improvement through feedback and iterative changes. Team and patient-facing materials are included and should be tailored to fit each unique CI program looking to implement CCIC. Conclusion: The CCIC model has the potential to dramatically streamline hearing healthcare delivery. Implementation requires an adaptive approach, as obstacles may vary according to institutional infrastructure and policies.

This study aims to determine if early device activation can influence cochlear implant electrode impedances by providing electrical stimulation within hours after cochlear implant surgery.Electrode...

Objective: To determine the relationship between intraoperative electrocochleography (ECochG) measurements and residual hearing preservation after cochlear implant (CI) surgery by comparing differences between preoperative and immediate postoperative bone conduction thresholds. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary academic referral center. Patients: Sixteen patients with preoperative residual hearing and measurable (no-vibrotactile) bone conduction thresholds at 250 and/or 500 Hz who underwent cochlear implantation. Main Outcome Measure: Intraoperative ECochG and air and bone conduction thresholds. Results: Nine patients showed no significant drop (<30%) in ECochG amplitude during CI surgery with an average preoperative and immediate postoperative BC threshold of 46 and 39 dB HL, respectively, at 500 Hz. Seven patients with a decrease in ECochG amplitude of 30% or greater showed an average preoperative 500 Hz BC threshold of 32 dB HL and immediate postoperative threshold of 55 dB HL. Air and bone conduction thresholds measured approximately 1 month after CI surgery show delayed-onset of hearing loss across our study patients. Conclusions: A small decrease (<30%) in difference response or cochlear microphonics amplitude correlates with no significant changes in immediate postoperative residual hearing, whereas patients who show larger changes (≥30%) in difference response or cochlear microphonics amplitude during intraoperative ECochG measurements show significant deterioration in BC thresholds. This study reveals the necessity of prompt postoperative bone conduction measurement to isolate the intraoperative cochlear trauma that may be detected during intraoperative ECochG measurements. Although delayed postoperative audiometrics represent longer-term functional hearing, it includes the sum of all postoperative changes during the recovery period, including subacute changes after implantation that may occur days or weeks later. Measuring air and bone conduction thresholds immediately postoperatively will better isolate factors influencing intraoperative, early postoperative, and delayed postoperative hearing loss. This will ultimately help refine surgical technique, device design, and highlight the use of intraoperative ECochG in monitoring cochlear trauma during CI surgery.

Intraoperative electrocochleography (ECOG) is performed using a single low-frequency acoustic stimulus (e.g., 500 Hz) to monitor cochlear microphonics (CM) during cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion. A decrease in CM amplitude is commonly associated with cochlear trauma and is used to guide electrode placement. However, advancement of the recording electrode beyond the sites of CM generation can also lead to a decrease in CM amplitude and is sometimes interpreted as cochlear trauma, resulting in unnecessary electrode manipulation and increased risk of cochlear trauma during CI electrode placement. In the present study, multi-frequency ECOG was used to monitor CM during CI electrode placement. The intraoperative CM tracings were compared with electrode scan measurements, where CM was measured for each of the intracochlear electrodes. Comparison between the peak CM amplitude measured during electrode placement and electrode scan measurements was used to differentiate between different mechanisms for decrease in CM amplitude during CI electrode insertion. Analysis of the data shows that both multi-frequency electrocochleography and electrode scan could potentially be used to differentiate between different mechanisms for decreasing CM amplitude and providing appropriate feedback to the surgeon during CI electrode placement.

Objective: Determine if changes in middle ear absorbance measured with wide-band tympanometry (WBT) occur following hearing-preservation cochlear implantation (CI). Such measures may provide insight into the mechanisms of acoustic hearing loss postimplantation. Study Design: Clinical capsule report. Setting: Tertiary academic referral center. Design: WBT absorbance was measured bilaterally during pre- and postoperative clinical office visits in five unilaterally-implanted cochlear implant recipients. Pre- and postoperative WBT measures were compared within each subject in the implanted and contralateral, unimplanted ears. Results: In general, WBT absorbance measurements show a broad spectral pattern including two or three distinct peaks measured over a frequency range of 226 to 8000 Hz. Grand average and linear mixed model comparisons between the pre- and postoperative WBT patterns show significantly reduced (p < 0.05) low-frequency absorbance in the implanted ears in the frequency region over 0.6 to 1.1 kHz, but not in the unimplanted ears. The maximum effect occurred at 1 kHz with absorbance decreasing from ∼0.8 to ∼0.5 after implantation. The limited data are consistent with expected relationships between WBT absorbance and air- and bone-conduction thresholds, assuming an increased air-bone gap reflects conductive hearing loss. Conclusion: Cochlear implantation can result in reduction of low-frequency acoustic absorbance as measured by WBT. WBT may be a useful and sensitive tool for monitoring the mechanical status of the middle and inner ears following cochlear implantation.