Solar photovoltaics is a direct use of solar resources to generate electricity, which is one of the most important renewable energy application approaches. Regional PV output could be affected by the regional patterns of temperature and irradiance, which are impacted by climate change. This study examines the impact of climate change on the energy yields from solar PV across China in the future under the medium-emission scenario (SSP245) and high-emission scenario (SSP585) by calculating PV potential using the data of solar radiation on a tilted surface and temperature. Generally, under the SSP245 scenario, solar radiation increased by 0.8% and 2.15%, and PV energy yields increased by 0.28% and 1.21% in 2020–2060 and 2061–2099, respectively; under the SSP585 scenario, solar radiation increased by 0.73% and 1.35%, and PV energy yields increased by 0.04% and −1.21% in 2020–2060 and 2061–2099, respectively. Under both scenarios, PV energy potential showed an obvious increase in southeast and central China and a significant decrease in northwest China, Tibet, and Inner Mongolia. Therefore, it is suggested that under the medium-emission scenario, climate change could increase the PV energy potential, while under the high-emission scenario, it could inhibit the PV energy potential in China.

The scientific estimation of carbon budgets induced by land use and land cover change (LUCC) can improve the accuracy of carbon budget estimates for terrestrial ecosystems and deepen our understanding of the future carbon sink potential of these ecosystems. Previous studies have typically selected one of many LUCC-induced carbon budget methods and overlooked the differences in the results between the different methods. Taking Henan Province, China, as a case study, we used the IPCC method, the bookkeeping model, and the inventory method to estimate LUCC-induced carbon budgets and compared the differences in these methods. The results showed that LUCC in Henan Province was categorized as a carbon sink from 1980 to 2015 based on the IPCC method and the inventory method. However, the estimates were significantly different, and the total estimates of the IPCC method were 40% less than those of the inventory method. At the regional ecogeographical scale, the two methods were not consistent in assessing the carbon source/sink of LUCC. The bookkeeping model categorized LUCC as a carbon source in Henan Province for the same period, and the carbon storage change trend opposed those of the other two methods. The failure of the IPCC method and the bookkeeping model to include the dynamic changes in carbon density caused by climate and land use management led to the great differences between the three methods. The inventory method is recommended to estimate the carbon budget caused by LUCC for regions where carbon density varies greatly over time. Both the IPCC method and the bookkeeping model may have great uncertainty in estimating changes in LUCC-induced carbon stocks and should be used with caution.

Understanding trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services (ESs) along environmental gradients is crucial for sustainable oasis management. This study investigated four key ESs—carbon storage (CS), habitat quality (HQ), water yield (WY), and soil conservation (SC)—in three typical oases along water–heat gradients in arid northwestern China. The InVEST model was used to quantify ESs in 1990, 2005, and 2022, and Pearson correlation, geographically weighted regression, K-means clustering, and random forest models were applied to analyze service relationships, ecosystem service bundles (ESBs), and driving factors. The results showed that CS and HQ maintained strong synergies, while the WY–SC relationship shifted from weak trade-offs under drier conditions to stronger synergies under more favorable water–heat conditions. Geographically weighted regression revealed spatial heterogeneity and directional asymmetry in ES relationships. Four ESB types were identified: ecologically fragile zones, ecological transition or buffer zones, agricultural production zones, and core ecological source zones. Driving-factor analysis indicated that vegetation-related services were mainly associated with land-cover structure and vegetation growth, whereas hydrological and erosion-related services were more closely linked to precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, temperature, and topography. These findings support differentiated oasis management through ecological restoration, development regulation, water-saving agriculture, and strict ecological protection.