Milan Vaghasiya

Mr. Milan Vaghasiya

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 April 2017 in Emergency Medicine Australasia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAmith L Shetty
Amith L Shetty
CTCaleb Teh
Caleb Teh
MVMatthew Vukasovic
Matthew Vukasovic
SJShannon Joyce
Shannon Joyce
MVMilan Vaghasiya
Milan Vaghasiya
RFRoberto Forero
Roberto Forero

1 November 2014 in Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MVMilan Vaghasiya
Milan Vaghasiya
MMMargaret Murphy
Margaret Murphy
DODaniel O’fLynn
Daniel O’fLynn
ASAmith Shetty
Amith Shetty

27 July 2021 in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MVMilan Vaghasiya
Milan Vaghasiya
JPJonathan Penm
Jonathan Penm
KKKevin K. Y. Kuan
Kevin K. Y. Kuan
NGNaren Gunja
Naren Gunja
YLYiren Liu
Yiren Liu
SPSimon Poon
Simon Poon
Background: Hospitals across Australia are implementing Clinical Information Systems, e.g. Electronic Medication Management Systems (EMMS) at a rapid pace to moderate health services. The benefits of the EMMS depend on the acceptance of the system by the clinicians. The study hospital used a unique patient-centric implementation strategy that was based on the guiding principle of “one patient, one chart” to avoid a patient being on a hybrid medication chart. This paper aims to study the factors facilitating or hindering the adoption of the EMMS as viewed by clinicians and the implementation team. Methods: Four focus groups (FG), one each for (1) doctors, (2) nurses, (3) pharmacists, and (4) implementation team, were conducted. A guide for the FG was based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Results: A total of 23 unique subthemes were identified and were grouped into five main themes (1) implementation strategy, (2) organisational outcome of EMMS, (3) individual impact of EMMS, (4) IT product, and (5) organisational culture. Clinicians reported improvement in their workflow efficiency post-EMMS implementation. They also reported some challenges in using the EMMS that centered around the area of infrastructure, technical and design issues. Additionally, the implementation team highlighted two crucial factors influencing the success of EMMS implementation, namely: (1) the patient-centric implementation strategy, and (2) the organisation readiness. Conclusion: Overall, this study outlines the implementation process of the EMMS in a large healthcare facility from the clinicians’ and the implementation team’s perspectives using UTAUT model. The result suggests that clinicians’ acceptance of the EMMS was highly influenced by the unique implementation strategy (namely, patient-centric approach and clinical leadership in the implementation team). Whereas the level of adoption of EMMS by clinicians was determined by their level of perceived and realised benefits. On the other hand, a number of barriers to the adoption of EMMS were discovered, namely, general training instead of customised training based on local needs, technical and design issues and lack of availability of computer systems. It is suggested that promptly resolving these issues can improve the adoption of the EMMS.

12 April 2016 in Emergency Medicine Australasia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAmith L Shetty
Amith L Shetty
TBTristam Brown
Tristam Brown
TBTarra Booth
Tarra Booth
KVKim Linh Van
Kim Linh Van
DDDaphna E Dor‐Shiffer
Daphna E Dor‐Shiffer
JIJonathan Iredell
Jonathan Iredell

MVMilan Vaghasiya
Milan Vaghasiya
SPSimon Poon
Simon Poon
NGNaren Gunja
Naren Gunja
JPJonathan Penm
Jonathan Penm
Medication errors at transition of care remain a concerning issue. In recent times, the use of integrated electronic medication management systems (EMMS) has caused a reduction in medication errors, but its effectiveness in reducing medication deviations at transition of care has not been studied in hospital-wide settings in Australia. The aim of this study is to assess medication deviations, such as omissions and mismatches, pre-EMMS and post-EMMS implementation at transition of care across a hospital. In this study, patient records were reviewed retrospectively to identify medication deviations (medication omissions and medication mismatches) at admission and discharge from hospital. A total of 400 patient records were reviewed (200 patients in the pre-EMMS and 200 patients in the post-EMMS group). Out of 400 patients, 112 in the pre-EMMS group and 134 patients in post-EMMS group met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. A total of 105 out of 246 patients (42.7%) had any medication deviations on their medications. In the pre-EMMS group, 59 out of 112 (52.7%) patients had any deviations on their medications compared to 46 out of 134 patients (34.3%) from the post-EMMS group (p = 0.004). The proportion of patients with medication omitted from inpatient orders was 36.6% in the pre-EMMS cohort vs. 22.4% in the post-EMMS cohort (p = 0.014). Additionally, the proportion of patients with mismatches in medications on the inpatient charts compared to their medication history was 4.5% in the pre-EMMS group compared to 0% in the post-EMMS group (p = 0.019). Similarly, the proportion of patients with medications omitted from their discharge summary was 23.2% in the pre-EMMS group vs. 12.7% in the post-EMMS group (p = 0.03). Our study demonstrates a reduction in medication deviations after the implementation of the EMMS in hospital settings.

16 March 2016 in Emergency Medicine Australasia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAmith L Shetty
Amith L Shetty
MVMilan Vaghasiya
Milan Vaghasiya
RBRachel Boddy
Rachel Boddy
KBKaren Byth
Karen Byth
DUDanielle Unwin
Danielle Unwin