Water is a basic element of the natural environment and the most important component in human water management. Rainfall is the main source of water. Therefore, determining the amount of precipitation reaching the ground using sensors is crucial information. Precise precipitation data are necessary for better modeling quality, as the observation data from weather stations are used as basics for weather model assessment. The authors compared precipitation from the Hellmann rain gauge (climatic precipitation, 1.0 m above the ground surface) measured throughout the year and the GGI 3000 rain gauge (actual precipitation on the ground level) measured from April to October. Measurement sequences from the years 2011–2020 were considered. The data for analysis were obtained from a weather station located in northern Poland. The authors analyzed the relationships between data from the two sensors. A comparative study showed that the measurements of actual precipitation are higher and there are strong relationships between actual and climatic rainfall (r = 0.99). Using the introduced coefficient it is possible to determine the full–year actual precipitation with high probability, taking into account the precipitation with a correction from the winter half-year and the actual precipitation from the summer half-year, which is of great importance in the calculation of the water balance.

In this study, we aimed to present solutions to mitigate the effects of climate change, summer torrential rain, and pluvial flooding. Within the Gdańsk living lab, a multicriteria analysis (MCA) was performed to assess the implementation of ecosystem-based adaptation (EBA) options for the city of Gdańsk. The results show an assessment of the stakeholders’ acceptability and local knowledge of selected EBA options including rainwater gardens, water parks, retention ponds, green roofs, green walls, community gardens, urban farming and tree plantation. All the proposed EBAs were generally accepted during an online living lab stakeholder meeting. However, EBA solutions that were less intrusive on the natural landscape were preferred over large structures. Yet during the consecutive physical workshop with identified stakeholder composition, there was a higher level of approval for large structures to reduce the level of flood risk, indicating that face-to-face meetings significantly influence the choice of measures during MCA procedures. This has highlighted the importance of physical meetings of MCA for selecting proper implementation options.

Drought is becoming more frequent and severe in many regions, particularly in Mediterranean climates, where water demand is increased by warming and changes in precipitation regimes. A long-term assessment of meteorological drought at the Lisbon climatological station is provided in this study using the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and the Reconnaissance Drought Index (RDI) over the period 1864–2021. Monthly precipitation and temperature data are used to compute SPI and RDI at 3-, 6-, and 12-month time scales, so that short-, mid-, and long-term droughts and their temporal evolution can be characterized. RDI is evaluated with three widely used empirical potential evapotranspiration (PET) formulations—Hargreaves, Thornthwaite, and Blaney–Criddle—in order to examine how PET estimations influence drought classification. Given the absence of a physically based reference PET—such as FAO-56 Penman–Monteith—for this station, the focus is on the internal consistency of the PET methods. Furthermore, the Hargreaves formulation is retained as a representative empirical PET for subsequent SPI–RDI comparison. The results show broadly consistent standardized RDI behavior across PET methods; it is indicated that drought conditions are captured more comprehensively by RDI than by SPI because both precipitation deficits and enhanced evaporative demand are included. At the Lisbon station, the estimated average return periods for short-, mid-, and long-term droughts are 3.79, 7.31, and 7.92 years according to RDI, compared with 3.86, 5.69 and 10.88 years from SPI. Several severe drought episodes are identified, including the years 1907, 1922–1923, 1944–1945, 1976, 1981, 1992–1993, 2005, and 2018. While no formal attribution analysis is performed, the drought characteristics are interpreted in the context of observed long-term warming and documented rainfall variability in Lisbon. The findings provide a single-station benchmark of historical drought behavior, by which local water-resources management can be supported and which can serve as a basis for future multi-station and climate-projection-based studies in Portugal.

This paper explores the behavioural change process initiated within the Gdańsk Coastal City Living Lab (CCLL)—a site-based effort, initiated under the H2020 SCORE project and significantly deepened through the Horizon Europe PRO-CLIMATE project—through the lens of transforming human–nature relationships for sustainable urban biodiversity conservation. While SCORE established the technical baseline for Nature-based Solutions (NbSs), PRO-CLIMATE provides the critical behavioural framework to ensure these solutions are socially adopted and sustained. Located in a flood-prone coastal city, the Gdańsk CCLL addresses the critical need for nature-based solutions (NbSs) in minimizing the negative impacts of climate change, particularly pluvial flooding. At the heart of this initiative is a participatory change process facilitated by local Change Agents in collaboration with key stakeholders across water management, local government, academia, and civil society. Drawing on interdisciplinary insights from social science, the paper uses the Nature Futures Framework to analyse how conservation actions are influenced by the relational, intrinsic, and instrumental values that stakeholders and residents attach to nature. The paper situates these values in the Gdańsk context and examines how they shape motivations and willingness to engage in urban NbS, such as green roofs, retention parks, and rainwater gardens. The study presents qualitative findings from stakeholder engagement workshops, Change Agents’ reflections, and support mechanisms from behavioural change experts. It evaluates how behavioural change was facilitated through shared vision building, feedback loops, and trust-based relationships, and how barriers were negotiated. A key contribution of the paper is the exploration of how bottom-up and top-down processes intersect in urban adaptation strategies and how behavioural change frameworks can be designed to institutionalise sustainable human–nature interactions in urban governance. The Gdańsk case offers transferable insights for other cities facing climate vulnerabilities while striving to embed biodiversity conservation into everyday practice.