Radiation therapy (RT) activates an in situ vaccine effect when combined with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), yet this effect may be limited because RT does not fully optimize tumor antigen presentation or fully overcome suppressive mechanisms in the tumor-immune microenvironment. To overcome this, we develop a multifunctional nanoparticle composed of polylysine, iron oxide, and CpG (PIC) to increase tumor antigen presentation, increase the ratio of M1:M2 tumor-associated macrophages, and enhance stimulation of a type I interferon response in conjunction with RT. In syngeneic immunologically “cold” murine tumor models, the combination of RT, PIC, and ICB significantly improves tumor response and overall survival resulting in cure of many mice and consistent activation of tumor-specific immune memory. Combining RT with PIC to elicit a robust in situ vaccine effect presents a simple and readily translatable strategy to potentiate adaptive anti-tumor immunity and augment response to ICB or potentially other immunotherapies.

Targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) and immunotherapy are rapidly growing classes of cancer treatments. Basic, translational, and clinical research are now investigating therapeutic combinations of these agents. In comparison to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), TRT has the unique advantage of treating all disease sites following intravenous injection and selective tumor uptake and retention—a particularly beneficial property in metastatic disease settings. The therapeutic value of combining radiation therapy with immune checkpoint blockade to treat metastases has been demonstrated in preclinical studies, whereas results of clinical studies have been mixed. Several clinical trials combining TRT and immune checkpoint blockade have been initiated based on preclinical studies combining these with EBRT and/or TRT. Despite the interest in translation of TRT and immunotherapy combinations, many questions remain surrounding the mechanisms of interaction and the optimal approach to clinical implementation of these combinations. This review highlights the mechanisms of interaction between anti-tumor immunity and radiation therapy and the status of basic and translational research and clinical trials investigating combinations of TRT and immunotherapies.

Background and purpose. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have been relatively ineffective against solid tumors. Low-dose radiation which can be delivered to multiple sites of metastases by targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) can elicit immunostimulatory effects. However, TRT has never been combined with CAR T cells against solid tumors in a clinical setting. This study investigated the effects of radiation delivered by Lutetium-177 (¹⁷⁷Lu) and Actinium-225 (²²⁵Ac) on the viability and effector function of CAR T cells in vitro to evaluate the feasibility of such therapeutic combinations. After the irradiation of anti-GD2 CAR T cells with various doses of radiation delivered by ¹⁷⁷Lu or ²²⁵Ac, their viability and cytotoxic activity against GD2-expressing human CHLA-20 neuroblastoma and melanoma M21 cells were determined by flow cytometry. The expression of the exhaustion marker PD-1, activation marker CD69 and the activating receptor NKG2D was measured on the irradiated anti-GD2 CAR T cells. Both ¹⁷⁷Lu and ²²⁵Ac displayed a dose-dependent toxicity on anti-GD2 CAR T cells. However, radiation enhanced the cytotoxic activity of these CAR T cells against CHLA-20 and M21 irrespective of the dose tested and the type of radionuclide. No significant changes in the expression of PD-1, CD69 and NKG2D was noted on the CAR T cells following irradiation. Given a lower CAR T cell viability at equal doses and an enhancement of cytotoxic activity irrespective of the radionuclide type, ¹⁷⁷Lu-based TRT may be preferred over ²²⁵Ac-based TRT when evaluating a potential synergism between these therapies in vivo against solid tumors.

Radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPT) activate a type I interferon (IFN1) response in tumor cells. We hypothesized that the timing and amplitude of this response varies by isotope. We compared equal doses delivered by 90Y, 177Lu, and 225Ac in vitro as unbound radionuclides and in vivo when chelated to NM600, a tumor-selective alkylphosphocholine. Response in murine MOC2 head and neck carcinoma and B78 melanoma was evaluated by qPCR and flow cytometry. Therapeutic response to 225Ac-NM600+anti-CTLA4+anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) was evaluated in wild-type and stimulator of interferon genes knockout (STING KO) B78. The timing and magnitude of the IFN1 response correlated with radionuclide half-life and linear energy transfer. The ratio of CD8+ T cells to regulatory T cells (Treg) increased in tumors 7 days after 90Y- and 177Lu-NM600 and day 21 after 225Ac-NM600. 225Ac-NM600+ICI improved survival in mice with wild-type but not with STING KO tumors, relative to monotherapies. Thus, we have found that the immunomodulatory effects of RPT vary with radioisotope and promote tumor cell STING-dependent enhanced response to ICIs in murine models. These findings have implications for the optimization of RPT–immunotherapy combinations and could guide the relative timing of therapies, the selection of isotope, and patient selection through tumor biomarkers.

Radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) synergises with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), but comparison of immunomodulation by different radioisotopes is lacking. Here, we evaluate mechanisms of response and timing of ICI administration relative to α- (²²⁵Ac) and β-emitting (⁹⁰Y, ¹⁷⁷Lu) radioisotope therapy, coupled with alkylphosphocholine NM600, when combined with dual (anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA4) ICI, using syngeneic poorly immunogenic (B78 and Myc-CaP) and immunogenic (MC38) murine models. Regardless of the isotope, RPT delivering 2 Gy mean tumor dose promotes tumor regression and improves survival in B78 or MC38 tumor-bearing mice when combined with early ICI administration. Greatest anti-tumor responses are seen in MC38 to ⁹⁰Y-NM600 + ICI and in B78 and Myc-CaP to ²²⁵Ac-NM600 + ICI. Flow cytometry and single-cell RNA and T cell receptor sequencing reveal that, combined with ICI, β-emitting radioisotopes expand existing adaptive immunity, whereas α-emitting radiopharmaceuticals initiate immune priming. Thus, appropriate application of α- or β-emitting RPT in combination with ICI achieves distinct antitumor immune responses.

Radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPT) activate a type I interferon (IFN1) response in tumor cells. We hypothesized that the timing and amplitude of this response varies by isotope. We compared equal doses delivered by ⁹⁰ Y, ¹⁷⁷ Lu, and ²²⁵ Ac in vitro as unbound radionuclides and in vivo when chelated to NM600, a tumor-selective alkylphosphocholine. Response in murine MOC2 head and neck carcinoma and B78 melanoma was evaluated by qPCR and flow cytometry. Therapeutic response to ²²⁵ Ac-NM600+anti-CTLA4+anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) was evaluated in wild-type and stimulator of interferon genes knockout (STING KO) B78. The timing and magnitude of IFN1 response correlated with radionuclide half-life and linear energy transfer. CD8 ⁺ /Treg ratios increased in tumors 7 days after ⁹⁰ Y- and ¹⁷⁷ Lu-NM600 and day 21 after ²²⁵ Ac-NM600. ²²⁵ Ac-NM600+ICI improved survival in mice with WT but not with STING KO tumors, relative to monotherapies. Immunomodulatory effects of RPT vary with radioisotope and promote STING-dependent enhanced response to ICIs in murine models. Teaser: This study describes the time course and nature of tumor immunomodulation by radiopharmaceuticals with differing physical properties.