Francisco  Javier Riesco González

Dr. Francisco Javier Riesco González

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 January 2023 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ANAzahara Rúger Navarrete
Azahara Rúger Navarrete
JLJuana María Vázquez Lara
Juana María Vázquez Lara
IAIrene Antúnez-Calvente
Irene Antúnez-Calvente
LRLuciano Rodríguez-Díaz
Luciano Rodríguez-Díaz
FGFrancisco Javier Riesco González
Francisco Javier Riesco González
FCFrancisco Javier Fernández Carrasco
Francisco Javier Fernández Carrasco
Giving birth is one of the most impressive experiences in life. However, many pregnant women suffer from fear of childbirth (FOC) and experience labour in very different ways, depending on their personality, previous life experiences, pregnancy, and birth circumstances. The aim of this study was to analyse how fear of childbirth affects the childbirth experience and to assess the related consequences. For this, a descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in a sample of 414 women between 1 July 2021 and 30 June 2022. The Birth Anticipation Scale (BAS) was used to measure fear of childbirth and the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E) was applied to measure satisfaction with the childbirth experience. Fear of childbirth negatively and significantly predicted the childbirth experience. In addition, women who were more fearful of childbirth were found to have worse obstetric outcomes and a higher likelihood of having a caesarean delivery (p = 0.008 C. I 95%). Fear behaved as a risk factor for the birth experience, so the greater the fear, the higher the risk of having a worse birth experience (OR 1.1). Encouraging active listening and support strategies may increase pregnant women’s confidence, thus decreasing their fear of the process and improving their childbirth experience.

31 May 2022 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FGFrancisco Javier Riesco González
Francisco Javier Riesco González
IAIrene Antúnez-Calvente
Irene Antúnez-Calvente
JVJuana María Vázquez-Lara
Juana María Vázquez-Lara
LRLuciano Rodríguez-Díaz
Luciano Rodríguez-Díaz
RPRocío Palomo-Gómez
Rocío Palomo-Gómez
FCFrancisco Javier Fernández Carrasco
Francisco Javier Fernández Carrasco
Background and Objectives: Pregnancy and postpartum are periods that imply numerous physical and psychological changes that could lead to mental health consequences. The aim of the present study is to identify whether women who had body image dissatisfaction had a higher incidence of postpartum depression 6 months after birth than women who did not have body image dissatisfaction. Materials and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was designed with a sample of 450 women from two hospitals in Andalusia. Quantitative variables were age and scores on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) for body image dissatisfaction. The qualitative variables used were marital status, self-perceived health status, diet or physical exercise, type of delivery, and others. Results: Body dissatisfaction was positively correlated with the symptomatology of postpartum depression. Thus, for each point increased in body dissatisfaction, the occurrence of depression also increased. There was a relationship between the study variables, so women who were more dissatisfied with their body image were more frequently depressed. Conclusions: In conclusion, it can be established that postpartum depression seems to be related to the presence of poor body image.

9 June 2025 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMaría Dolores Vazquez Lara
María Dolores Vazquez Lara
ANAzahara Ruger Navarrete
Azahara Ruger Navarrete
SASamia Mohamed Abdel-lah
Samia Mohamed Abdel-lah
Jose L. Gómez-UrquizaJose L. Gómez-Urquiza
Jose L. Gómez-Urquiza
FCFrancisco Javier Fernández Carrasco
Francisco Javier Fernández Carrasco
JLJuana María Vázquez Lara
Juana María Vázquez Lara
Background: Mental health problems that can appear in women during pregnancy include fear, anxiety, feelings of vulnerability, stress, and depression. Mindfulness (MF) is a specific meditation technique that can help during treatment for prenatal mood disorders, emotional distress, and psychological strains. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a specific meditation approach in women during pregnancy on these mental health problems. Methods: This systematic review analysed data from PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL. The search equation used was “mindfulness [title] AND pregnancy [title] AND (trial OR clinical trial OR RCT OR quasi-experimental OR experimental OR randomised clinical trial OR randomised controlled trial OR quasi-experimental study)”. This analyses experimental studies published in the last 10 years that include interventions based on MF, applying cognitive behavioural therapies to reduce stress, depression, and anxiety and in which the participants completed a questionnaire related to these variables. Standardised means effect size meta-analysis was performed with RevMan Web. Results: All the included studies (n = 13) reported that the intervention led to a decrease in negative symptoms related to prenatal pressure, apprehension, and melancholy. The duration of the MF programmes was 6 to 8 weeks. The meta-analysis showed that MF during pregnancy is an effective approach, with a standardised mean difference of −0.73 for anxiety, −0.67 for depression, and −0.74 for stress. Conclusions: Mindfulness programmes during pregnancy are a useful and effective means of reducing maternal stress, anxiety, and depression. Including MF programmes during pregnancy should be considered depending on resources availability. In person vs. online effectiveness should be investigated.

25 January 2024 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RPRocío Palomo-Gómez
Rocío Palomo-Gómez
ANAzahara Ruger Navarrete
Azahara Ruger Navarrete
IAIrene Antúnez-Calvente
Irene Antúnez-Calvente
JVJuana María Vázquez-Lara
Juana María Vázquez-Lara
LRLuciano Rodríguez-Díaz
Luciano Rodríguez-Díaz
FCFrancisco Javier Fernández Carrasco
Francisco Javier Fernández Carrasco
Pregnancy is one of the most complex periods in a woman’s life, not only because of the biological changes involved but also because of the psychological aspects. Stress during pregnancy refers to the concerns and distress that arise during pregnancy and that can be assessed by means of psychological and physiological scales. The aim of this study was to analyse prenatal stress and to evaluate its consequences on the health of both the mother and the foetus. A descriptive longitudinal study was carried out on a sample of 398 pregnant women being followed up during their entire pregnancy, who gave birth at the Punta de Europa University Hospital in Algeciras (Spain) between September 2021 and August 2023. The Prenatal Distress Questionnaire (PDQ) was used, as well as serum cortisol levels in each trimester of pregnancy and birth experience using the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire in its validated Spanish version, CEQ-E. Demographic and obstetric variables were included. One of the main findings was that experiencing more stress in late pregnancy had a negative impact on obstetric outcomes. Women who had higher levels of prenatal distress had higher blood cortisol levels and increased risk of having a caesarean section at delivery. A significant negative correlation was also found between stress and Apgar test values in the first minute of life. It is concluded that interventions promoted by the health system that provide comprehensive prenatal care contribute to decreased stress as perceived by these pregnant women, thus reducing the risk of maternal and foetal morbidity.

22 November 2022 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FCFrancisco Javier Fernández Carrasco
Francisco Javier Fernández Carrasco
EMErika Marbely Molina-Yanes
Erika Marbely Molina-Yanes
IAIrene Antúnez-Calvente
Irene Antúnez-Calvente
LRLuciano Rodríguez-Díaz
Luciano Rodríguez-Díaz
FGFrancisco Javier Riesco González
Francisco Javier Riesco González
JLJuana María Vázquez Lara
Juana María Vázquez Lara
Increased life expectancy in Spain has highlighted the need for formal caregivers who care for older adults who live at home. In many cases, families choose to hire immigrants from Latin America who, on many occasions, have been forced to emigrate, which causes a considerable psychological impact on them. To this, other factors such as precarious working conditions, loneliness, or high workload are added, which leads to many caregivers becoming sick. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of life and the level of anxiety derived from the workload of Latin American immigrants who come to Spain to care for older adults. A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out using two validated questionnaires to measure this relationship. A correlation was also established between quality of life and anxiety as expressed by the participants. The sample consisted of a total of 426 subjects. One of the main results showed that the lower the caregiver’s quality of life, the higher their level of anxiety (OR = 1.06; 95% CI). Live-in caregivers had a lower quality of life than people who did not live in the same house as the cared-for person (OR = 2.22; 95% CI). Working long hours and having a high workload was associated with poorer quality of life and higher levels of anxiety. Assessing immigrants who are formal caregivers and providing them with the support that helps to improve their quality of life is suggested to reduce the occurrence of anxiety disorders.

14 May 2026 in International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
IAIrene Antúnez-Calvente
Irene Antúnez-Calvente
JVJuana María Vázquez-Lara
Juana María Vázquez-Lara
LRLuciano Rodríguez-Díaz
Luciano Rodríguez-Díaz
ANAzahara Ruger Navarrete
Azahara Ruger Navarrete
BMBeatriz Mérida-Yáñez
Beatriz Mérida-Yáñez
FCFrancisco Javier Fernández Carrasco
Francisco Javier Fernández Carrasco
Obstetric violence encompasses harmful practices and care dynamics during pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum that undermine women's dignity, autonomy, and rights, and is associated with structural, gender, and organisational factors in maternity care. To explore how midwives understand, experience, and interpret obstetric violence in delivery room settings, including its perceived causes and contextual conditions. A qualitative study based on Gadamerian hermeneutic phenomenology was conducted with ten hospital midwives from two public hospitals in Andalusia and Catalonia. Semi-structured interviews (November 2024-April 2025) were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed iteratively using ATLAS.ti, with researcher triangulation and participant validation. Midwives described obstetric violence as a multifactorial phenomenon influenced by women's vulnerability, communication, professional practices, and healthcare system conditions. Woman-centred care, communication, and professional autonomy were identified as protective factors, while workload and institutional constraints hindered individualised care. This study contributes an underexplored midwifery perspective to a field mainly focused on women's experiences. Preventing obstetric violence requires strengthening communication, informed consent, women's participation, professional education, and organisational conditions that support respectful, woman-centred maternity care. Obstetric violence should be interpreted not only in relation to individual intent, but also in relation to its relational, structural, and experiential dimensions.