The increasing global burden of Parkinson’s disease (PD), termed the PD pandemic, is exceeding expectations related purely to population aging and is likely driven in part by lifestyle changes and environmental factors. Pesticides are well recognized risk factors for PD, supported by both epidemiological and experimental evidence, with multiple detrimental effects beyond dopaminergic neuron damage alone. The microbiome-gut-brain axis has gained much attention in recent years and is considered to be a significant contributor and driver of PD pathogenesis. In this narrative review, we first focus on how both pesticides and the microbiome may influence PD initiation and progression independently, describing pesticide-related central and peripheral neurotoxicity and microbiome-related local and systemic effects due to dysbiosis and microbial metabolites. We then depict the bidirectional interplay between pesticides and the microbiome in the context of PD, synthesizing current knowledge about pesticide-induced dysbiosis, microbiome-mediated alterations in pesticide availability, metabolism and toxicity, and complex systemic pesticide-microbiome-host interactions related to inflammatory and metabolic pathways, insulin resistance and other mechanisms. An overview of the unknowns follows, and the role of pesticide-microbiome interactions in the proposed body-/brain-first phenotypes of PD, the complexity of environmental exposures and gene-environment interactions is discussed. The final part deals with possible further steps for translation, consisting of recommendations on future pesticide use and research as well as an outline of promising preventive/therapeutic approaches targeted on strengthening or restoring a healthy gut microbiome, closing with a summary of current gaps and future perspectives in the field.
Objective To evaluate the point of view of patients with Parkinson disease (PD) on early detection and risk disclosure in the prodromal phase of PD and to derive recommendations for an ethical framework for the recruitment of prodromal PD cohorts. Methods A standardized questionnaire to evaluate the patients9 perception on early diagnosis in PD was designed by an interdisciplinary study group. After testing in a preliminary feasibility study (n = 20), the survey was performed retrospectively with patients from our clinic. Results A total of 101 patients with PD answered the questions. The majority of patients reported that time from onset of motor symptoms to diagnosis was burdensome, including false diagnoses and many consultations of various medical specialists. However, most of the patients evaluated early risk disclosure with skepticism. Freedom of choice and the potential of changes in lifestyle were rated as important. Conclusion Although patients with PD reported the time to diagnosis retrospectively as burdensome, the majority was skeptical regarding early disclosure of risk, especially with regard to the lack of pharmacologic options. Circumstances under which early detection and disclosure would have been approved by the majority of patients were (1) advice on lifestyle changes (exercise, nutrition) as potentially disease course–modifying therapy; (2) the establishment of an early diagnosis “culture,” including early clarification of the patients9 wish to know; and (3) regular support and follow-up of individuals after risk disclosure.