James C Blankenship

Dr. James C Blankenship

Division Cardiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2011 in JACC
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJames C Blankenship
James C Blankenship
TSThomas D. Scott
Thomas D. Scott
KSKimberly A. Skelding
Kimberly A. Skelding
THThomas A. Haldis
Thomas A. Haldis
KTKaren Tompkins-Weber
Karen Tompkins-Weber
PBPeter B. Berger
Peter B. Berger

28 April 2021 in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SNSrihari S. Naidu
Srihari S. Naidu
JAJinnette Abbott
Jinnette Abbott
JBJayant Bagai
Jayant Bagai
JBJames C Blankenship
James C Blankenship
SGSantiago Garcia
Santiago Garcia
DKDaniel M. Kolansky
Daniel M. Kolansky
The current document commissioned by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) and endorsed by the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and Heart Rhythm Society represents a comprehensive update to the 2012 and 2016 consensus documents on patient‐centered best practices in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Comprising updates to staffing and credentialing, as well as evidence‐based updates to the pre‐, intra‐, and post‐procedural logistics, clinical standards and patient flow, the document also includes an expanded section on CCL governance, administration, and approach to quality metrics. This update also acknowledges the collaboration with various specialties, including discussion of the heart team approach to management, and working with electrophysiology colleagues in particular. It is hoped that this document will be utilized by hospitals, health systems, as well as regulatory bodies involved in assuring and maintaining quality, safety, efficiency, and cost‐effectiveness of patient throughput in this high volume area.

24 April 2018 in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASArnold H. Seto
Arnold H. Seto
ASAdhir Shroff
Adhir Shroff
MAMazen Abu‐Fadel
Mazen Abu‐Fadel
JBJames C Blankenship
James C Blankenship
KBKonstantinos Dean Boudoulas
Konstantinos Dean Boudoulas
SRSunil V. Rao
Sunil V. Rao
Since the publication of the 2009 SCAI Expert Consensus Document on Length of Stay Following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), advances in vascular access techniques, stent technology, and antiplatelet pharmacology have facilitated changes in discharge patterns following PCI. Additional clinical studies have demonstrated the safety of early and same day discharge in selected patients with uncomplicated PCI, while reimbursement policies have discouraged unnecessary hospitalization. This consensus update: (1) clarifies clinical and reimbursement definitions of discharge strategies, (2) reviews the technological advances and literature supporting reduced hospitalization duration and risk assessment, and (3) describes changes to the consensus recommendations on length of stay following PCI (Supporting Information Table S1). These recommendations are intended to support reasonable clinical decision making regarding postprocedure length of stay for a broad spectrum of patients undergoing PCI, rather than prescribing a specific period of observation for individual patients.

1 September 2001 in JACC
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJames C Blankenship
James C Blankenship
GTGudaye Tasissa
Gudaye Tasissa
JOJ.COnor O’sHea
J.COnor O’sHea
EIElias A Iliadis
Elias A Iliadis
FBFouad A Bachour
Fouad A Bachour
JTJames E Tcheng
James E Tcheng

28 April 2021 in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CGCindy L. Grines
Cindy L. Grines
AKAndrew J. Klein
Andrew J. Klein
HBHolly Bauser‐Heaton
Holly Bauser‐Heaton
MAMohamad Alkhouli
Mohamad Alkhouli
NKNeelima Katukuri
Neelima Katukuri
MYMichael N. Young
Michael N. Young
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death in the United States. However, percutaneous interventional cardiovascular therapies are often underutilized in Blacks, Hispanics, and women and may contribute to excess morbidity and mortality in these vulnerable populations. The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) is committed to reducing racial, ethnic, and sex‐based treatment disparities in interventional cardiology patients. Accordingly, each of the SCAI Clinical Interest Councils (coronary, peripheral, structural, and congenital heart disease [CHD]) participated in the development of this whitepaper addressing disparities in diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes in underserved populations. The councils were charged with summarizing the available data on prevalence, treatment, and outcomes and elucidating potential reasons for any disparities. Given the huge changes in racial and ethnic composition by age in the United States (Figure 1), it was difficult to determine disparities in rates of diagnosis and we expected to find some racial differences in prevalence of disease. For example, since the average age of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is 80 years, one may expect 80% of TAVR patients to be non‐Hispanic White. Conversely, only 50% of congenital heart interventions would be expected to be performed in non‐Hispanic Whites. Finally, we identified opportunities for SCAI to advance clinical care and equity for our patients, regardless of sex, ethnicity, or race.

1 December 2010 in The American Journal of Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJames C Blankenship
James C Blankenship
KSKimberly A. Skelding
Kimberly A. Skelding
TSThomas D. Scott
Thomas D. Scott
PBPeter B. Berger
Peter B. Berger
HPHelen Parise
Helen Parise
GSGregg W. Stone
Gregg W. Stone