Baoqing Chen

Dr. Baoqing Chen


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 March 2023 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BCBaoqing Chen
Baoqing Chen
JCJixiao Cui
Jixiao Cui
Wenyi DongWenyi Dong
Wenyi Dong
CYChangrong Yan
Changrong Yan
Polyethylene film mulch (PM) is a kind of widely used technology to improve crop yields worldwide; however, because of a problem related with plastic residual pollution, it has gradually been replaced by biodegradable plastic film mulch (BDP). Although BDP has helped to solve the plastic residual pollution, its consequences in terms of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have rarely been revealed. Related knowledge is important for forming low-carbon development strategies for the plastic industry and agriculture. The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of BDP on GHG emissions at different stages of its life cycle, and determine whether replacing polyethylene (PE) film with BDP film is a helpful way to reduce national GHG emissions. The results of this study suggest that the application of BDP improved the GHG emissions associated with agricultural inputs, but induced lower GHG emissions at the growing stage and the waste disposal stage, and resulted in lower total area-scale GHG emissions. Compared to the no mulch (NM) cultivation system, the yield-scale carbon footprint was reduced in both the PM and BDP cultivation systems, which meant that both PM and BDP produced lower GHG emissions than NM for the production of the same amount of grain. It was concluded that BDP is not only a measure to control the problem of plastic residue pollution in agriculture, but it can also mitigate the GHG emissions.

1 April 2019 in Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BCBaoqing Chen
Baoqing Chen
SGSarah Garre
Sarah Garre
HLHaitao Liu
Haitao Liu
CYChangrong Yan
Changrong Yan
ELEnke Liu
Enke Liu
XMXurong Mei
Xurong Mei

6 September 2024 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LHLu Hua
Lu Hua
ZYZhenxing Yang
Zhenxing Yang
WLWenqian Li
Wenqian Li
YZYidong Zhao
Yidong Zhao
JXJie Xia
Jie Xia
BCBaoqing Chen
Baoqing Chen
Returning straw to the field is a crucial practice for enhancing soil quality and increasing efficient use of secondary crop products. However, maize straw has a higher carbon-to-nitrogen ratio compared to other crops. This can result in crop nitrogen loss when the straw is returned to the field. Therefore, it is crucial to explore how different methods of straw return affect maize (Zea mays L.) farmland. In this study, a field experiment was performed with three treatments (I, no straw returned, CK; II, direct straw return, SR; and III, straw returned in deep furrows, ISR) to explore the effects of the different straw return modes on soil carbon and nitrogen content and greenhouse gas emissions. The results indicated that the SR and ISR treatments increased the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) content in the topsoil (0–15 cm). Additionally, the ISR treatment boosted the contents of total nitrogen (TN), nitrate nitrogen (NO3−-N), ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N), dissolved organic nitrogen (DON), and DOC in the subsurface soil (15–30 cm) compared with CK. When it comes to greenhouse gas emissions, the ISR treatment led to an increase in CO2 emissions. However, SR and ISR reduced N2O emissions, with ISR showing a more pronounced reduction. The ISR treatment significantly increased leaf and grain biomass compared to CK and SR. The correlation analyses showed that the yield was positively correlated with soil DOC, and soil greenhouse gas emission was correlated with soil NO3−-N. The ISR technology has great potential in sequestering soil organic matter, improving soil fertility, and realizing sustainable agricultural development.

28 October 2022 in Plant and Soil
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WDWenyi Dong
Wenyi Dong
ZZZhe Zhang
Zhe Zhang
BCBaoqing Chen
Baoqing Chen
DSDongbao Sun
Dongbao Sun
Enke LiuEnke Liu
Enke Liu

17 July 2026 in Carbon Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
晓梁晓阳 梁
晓阳 梁
CWChuanjuan Wang
Chuanjuan Wang
HWHaitao Wang
Haitao Wang
YWYongxing Wen
Yongxing Wen
jiandong Wangjiandong Wang
jiandong Wang
BCBaoqing Chen
Baoqing Chen
Biogas slurry topdressing (BSTD) is a promising strategy for efficient liquid waste utilization and sustainable agricultural production. However, the field-scale regulation of soil dissolved organic carbon (DOC) by BSTD remains insufficiently understood across crop growth stages and soil depths. Therefore, this field experiment investigated the temporal and spatial responses of soil DOC to BSTD during the middle and late stages of maize growth. The results showed that, compared with pure chemical fertilizer topdressing (CF), BSTD increased soil DOC content at the tasseling stage (VT) but decreased it at the milk stage (R3), while the ultraviolet–visible spectrum slope ratio increased at both stages and decreased at the maturity stage (R6). The fluorescence index (FI), freshness index (β:α), and biological index (BIX) increased with soil depth but decreased with maize growth stage. Overall, BSTD promoted increases in FI (2.08%), β:α (3.80%), humification index (2.83%), and BIX (3.98%), and altered soil DOC composition by increasing the proportions of humic acid-like substances (5.86%) and soluble microbial by-products (4.97%). Additionally, partial least squares path modeling indicated that soil depth was the most direct and significant factor regulating excitation-emission matrix indices, organic components, and soil DOC content. By linking BSTD-derived inputs with crop-stage dynamics and soil-profile heterogeneity, this study clarifies how biogas slurry reshapes DOC transformation and partial stabilization under field conditions, providing a scientific basis for the sustainable agricultural use of biogas slurry in dryland agriculture. Graphical Abstract