Ectopic permanent molar is a condition in which the permanent tooth deviates from its normal path of eruption. The etiology of this eruption anomaly is multifactorial, with both general and local factors. The principal results suggest that a valid indicator of irreversible consequences is the degree of impaction of the first permanent molar. Self-correction is most common between the ages of 7 and 8, after which help may be required. Accordingly, early management can assist in preventing subsequent potential challenges that could interfere with maintaining a balanced occlusion. Several variables, including the degree of mesial tilting, the level of root resorption, and the condition of the second primary molar, may be crucial in choosing the most effective method of treatment. Interproximal wedging and distal tipping are the two basic therapeutic strategies for ectopic permanent molars. Additionally, the use of fixed or removable appliances might also be required. Delaying treatment until a later stage is not recommended because early diagnosis and treatment are essential for optimal management. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of ectopic permanent molars, including their prevalence, etiologic factors, self-correction rates, clinical implications for adjacent teeth, and various treatment techniques, that emphasizes the importance of early detection and intervention in the successful management of ectopic permanent molars. In addition, it highlights the importance of future research into the contributing variables of irreversible ectopic molar outcomes.

Background: The Hall Technique (HT) in pediatric dentistry is a minimally invasive method for treating carious primary molars by sealing cavities with preformed stainless-steel crowns, eliminating the need for local anesthesia, caries removal or tooth preparation. Objectives: To assess the knowledge, attitude, and teaching of HT among pediatric dentistry faculty in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study involved 36 pediatric dentistry faculty members from six dental colleges in Riyadh. Data were collected using a validated questionnaire covering demographics and professional information, HT knowledge, attitude, and teaching strategies. Results: Thirty-one pediatric dentistry faculty responded to the questionnaire, and 67.74% of participants use HT clinically, primarily for asymptomatic carious primary molars. Most participants learned about HT during postgraduate residency (61.29%), while only 6.45% were introduced to it in undergraduate training. Teaching practices varied, with 51.61% teaching HT to undergraduate and/or postgraduate students, and 16.13% omitting it from their curriculum. Key barriers to HT adoption included limited undergraduate exposure, misconceptions, and a lack of standardized guidelines. Fisher’s Exact Test showed that gender, academic position, and years of experience were significantly associated with HT use. Only years of experience were significantly associated with recommending HT use by undergraduate students. No factors were significantly associated with teaching HT. Conclusions: While awareness of HT is high among pediatric dentistry faculty, inconsistent teaching and limited clinical use hinder its full integration. Addressing these barriers through curriculum updates and professional development could enhance the acceptance and quality of HT use in pediatric dentistry in Saudi Arabia.

Background/Objectives: Emergency department healthcare professionals are often the first to provide treatment, yet studies indicate limited knowledge in Traumatic Dental Injuries (TDIs) management among these providers. While research on TDI management in emergency departments exists globally, recent data from Saudi Arabia is lacking. This study aims to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of emergency department physicians, nurses, and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) regarding TDIs in three major hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Results: Physicians (46.4%) were significantly (p = 0.02) more likely to respond that they have sufficient knowledge about TDIs compared to nurses and EMS personnel. Of the 221 respondents, 136 (62%) were in the age group of 30–40 years, while females (OR 4.23, p = 0.00, CI 2.29–23.13) and nurses (OR 4.88, p = 0.00, CI 2.39–9.96) were more likely to say ‘No’ for any form of training they received in dental trauma during their education. Young (20–30 years old) professionals (OR 3.70, p = 0.04, CI 1.53–8.92) were less likely to feel confident in managing cases of dental trauma compared to their senior colleagues. Conclusions: In this study, nurses’ and EMS personnel’s knowledge of dental trauma management was poorer than that of physicians. Most respondents reported that dental trauma management was not part of their curriculum or training, which, in turn, was reflected in their low confidence in managing such cases.