Background: The Hall Technique (HT) in pediatric dentistry is a minimally invasive method for treating carious primary molars by sealing cavities with preformed stainless-steel crowns, eliminating the need for local anesthesia, caries removal or tooth preparation. Objectives: To assess the knowledge, attitude, and teaching of HT among pediatric dentistry faculty in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study involved 36 pediatric dentistry faculty members from six dental colleges in Riyadh. Data were collected using a validated questionnaire covering demographics and professional information, HT knowledge, attitude, and teaching strategies. Results: Thirty-one pediatric dentistry faculty responded to the questionnaire, and 67.74% of participants use HT clinically, primarily for asymptomatic carious primary molars. Most participants learned about HT during postgraduate residency (61.29%), while only 6.45% were introduced to it in undergraduate training. Teaching practices varied, with 51.61% teaching HT to undergraduate and/or postgraduate students, and 16.13% omitting it from their curriculum. Key barriers to HT adoption included limited undergraduate exposure, misconceptions, and a lack of standardized guidelines. Fisher’s Exact Test showed that gender, academic position, and years of experience were significantly associated with HT use. Only years of experience were significantly associated with recommending HT use by undergraduate students. No factors were significantly associated with teaching HT. Conclusions: While awareness of HT is high among pediatric dentistry faculty, inconsistent teaching and limited clinical use hinder its full integration. Addressing these barriers through curriculum updates and professional development could enhance the acceptance and quality of HT use in pediatric dentistry in Saudi Arabia.

Background: Pediatric dental care emphasizes the holistic well-being of children, integrating physical, psychological, and social aspects of their health. Parental satisfaction serves as a valuable indicator of healthcare quality, influencing children’s adherence to dental visits and long-term oral health outcomes. Objectives: This cross-sectional study aimed to assess parental satisfaction with pediatric dental care provided by undergraduate dental students at the College of Dentistry (COD), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Methods: A validated, interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect data from 128 parents of children aged 12 years or younger who received dental treatment between January and May 2023. The questionnaire addressed demographic information, appointment details, and satisfaction using a five-point Likert scale. Results: A total of 128 parents or primary caregivers participated in the study. Most were mothers (62.5%) and aged between 35 and 44 years (57.8%). The majority (99.2%) reported that they were either satisfied with the pediatric dental care their child received. Overall satisfaction was significantly associated with waiting time (p = 0.002) and reason for visit (p = 0.042). No significant associations were found with parental age, education level, or student year. Conclusion: Ongoing assessment of parental satisfaction can inform improvements in clinical education and patient care within undergraduate dental programs.

Purpose: To explore National Survey of Pharmacy Practice at MOH hospitals in Saudi Arabia 2016-2017: Preparation of medications and Dispensing. Methods: It is a 4-months cross-sectional National Survey of Pharmacy Practice at MOH hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The study consisted of two parts; the demographic information and the second part contained eighty-five questions divided into nine domains drove from American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) and Saudi Pharmaceutical Society (SPS) survey, the international standard of Joint Commission of Hospital Accreditation. An electronic questionnaire was distributed to 185 directors of pharmacies at MOH hospitals. The study discussed and analyzed National Survey of Pharmacy Practice at MOH hospitals in Saudi Arabia 2016: Preparation of medications and Dispensing. All analysis is done through survey monkey system. Results: The survey was carried out in 185 hospitals, the rate of reply was 105 (56.75%). The pharmacy services were the drug distribution unit dose 36 (34.3%), repacking operation system 15 (14.3% %), an extemporaneous preparation 22 (21 %), and Intravenous admixture 8 (7.6%) only. The drug distribution by unit dose commonly not existed at the hospital less than 100 beds size 18 (17.14). The Intravenous admixture commonly found at 200-400 beds hospitals 6 (5.7%). The hospital home infusion therapy provided from six (5.7%) hospital pharmacies only. The most outpatient prescriptions dispensed to hospital employees 69 (65.7%) hospital clinic or patients discharged or emergency room 63 (60 %), general public 58 (55.2%), and home healthcare services 31 (29.5%). The most system founded to assure the accuracy of preparations and dispensing. One pharmacist check drug order before dispensing 48 (45.7%), and two pharmacists review high-risk drugs 28 (26.7%) at all type of hospitals bed size. Conclusion: The essential elements of pharmacy, the cost, and improve outcomes associated with drug therapy care of patients as a member of the multidisciplinary care team. [5,6,7] To Provide PC; pharmacists should supply the knowledge of clinical pharmacy and best skills.[7] In Saudi Arabia, PC practice is still improving. In a study of Al-Arifi et al. showed that practice was weak at MOH hospitals. Annual survey of pharmacy services with improving drug distribution system prevent drug-related problem and improve patient care at Hospitals in Saudi Arabia.

Medication errors pose a significant threat to patient safety globally, including in Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to assess healthcare professionals' (HCPs) understanding, attitudes, and challenges regarding medication error reporting in Saudi hospitals. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a self-administered online questionnaire among HCPs (physicians, pharmacists, and nurses) from various hospitals across Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire explored their knowledge, attitudes, and experiences related to medication error reporting. A total of 170 hCPs participated in the study, with the majority being under 35 years old (67.06%), female (70.59%), and Saudi nationals (74.71%). A majority of participants (87.06%) had heard of the medication error report form, and 73.53% reported medication errors before. Participants aged less than 35 years had significantly lower knowledge scores compared to those aged 35-45 years (p = 0.021), and male participants had significantly higher knowledge scores compared to female participants (p = 0.005). Pharmacists had the highest knowledge scores among all health professions (p < 0.001), and participants working in government hospitals had significantly higher knowledge scores compared to those working in private hospitals (p = 0.034). In terms of attitude scores, male participants had significantly higher attitude scores compared to female participants (p = 0.046). This study highlights progress in medication error reporting among HCPs in Saudi Arabia but identifies gaps in knowledge, reporting, and systemic barriers. Addressing these challenges through education, process optimization, and a non-punitive reporting culture is key to improving safety. Future research should expand beyond hospitals and assess policy and training impacts over time.

Background/Objectives: Emergency department healthcare professionals are often the first to provide treatment, yet studies indicate limited knowledge in Traumatic Dental Injuries (TDIs) management among these providers. While research on TDI management in emergency departments exists globally, recent data from Saudi Arabia is lacking. This study aims to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of emergency department physicians, nurses, and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) regarding TDIs in three major hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Results: Physicians (46.4%) were significantly (p = 0.02) more likely to respond that they have sufficient knowledge about TDIs compared to nurses and EMS personnel. Of the 221 respondents, 136 (62%) were in the age group of 30–40 years, while females (OR 4.23, p = 0.00, CI 2.29–23.13) and nurses (OR 4.88, p = 0.00, CI 2.39–9.96) were more likely to say ‘No’ for any form of training they received in dental trauma during their education. Young (20–30 years old) professionals (OR 3.70, p = 0.04, CI 1.53–8.92) were less likely to feel confident in managing cases of dental trauma compared to their senior colleagues. Conclusions: In this study, nurses’ and EMS personnel’s knowledge of dental trauma management was poorer than that of physicians. Most respondents reported that dental trauma management was not part of their curriculum or training, which, in turn, was reflected in their low confidence in managing such cases.