Objective: To better manage the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospitals, numerous scheduled procedures have been postponed nationwide. Design and Methods: Retrospective analysis of patient characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in the period prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (2018 and 2019) and during the pandemic (2020 and 2021). This study assesses the in-hospital outcomes. Main endpoints are Rutherford stages at admission for intervention, incidence of amputation, of total occlusion, and duration of intervention. The data were analyzed descriptively. Results: The total number of interventions due to PAD had decreased in 2020, but not significantly during the pandemic period (n = 5351) compared to the period prior to COVID-19 pandemic (n = 5351) (p = 0.589). The proportion of interventions treated for critical limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) increased from 2018/2019 (n = 2112) to 2020/2021 (n = 2426) (p < 0.001). However, the proportion of patients with wounds requiring amputation was not higher during the pandemic (n = 191) than before (n = 176) (minor amputations p = 0.2302, major amputations p = 0.9803). The proportion of total occlusions did not differ significantly between the pre-COVID-19 (n = 3082) and the COVID-19 pandemic periods (n = 2996) (p = 0.8207). Multilevel interventions did not increase significantly from 2018/2019 (n = 1930) to 2020/2021 (n = 2071). Between 2018/2019 and 2020/2021, the procedure duration and fluoroscopy duration increased significantly. However, parameters such as contrast agent volume and radiation dose did not differ significantly. The average length of stay was 4.6 days. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on the in-patient care of PAD patients in terms of disease stage severity and complexity. However, the amputation rate was not affected.

Objective: Patients with peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAD) are at risk of developing foot ulcers, which can subsequently lead to foot infections and an increased risk of amputation. In cases of severe ischemic foot infections (IFIs), the empirical use of antibiotics can be limb-saving. However, there is currently no evidence-based guidance on the choice of empirical antibiotic therapy for IFI. Methods and Design: This retrospective single-center cohort study included 216 hospitalized patients with severe IFI undergoing endovascular revascularization. Weighted-Incidence Syndromic Combination Antibiograms (WISCAs) were calculated to guide empirical antibiotic choice. Results: The two most common causative pathogens for IFI were S. aureus and P. aeruginosa, with frequencies of 19.8% and 6.1%, respectively. The calculation of WISCAs revealed a low empirical coverage of amoxicillin (AMX) or clindamycin (CLN) with 21.6% and 27.7%, respectively. The empirical coverage of amoxicillin/clavulanic-acid (AMC), trimethoprim/sulfmethoxazole (SXT), and ciprofloxacin (CIP) was 50.6%, 53.1%, and 55.4%, respectively. Piperacillin/tazobactam (PT) exhibited the highest empirical coverage, with 82.5% as calculated by WISCAs. The calculated WISCAs did not significantly alter when stratified by the clinical characteristics of the patients. Conclusions: The empirical antibiotic coverage of CLN and AMX was low. SXT represents a promising empirical alternative in the case of IFI, irrespective of comorbidities and the WIfI score. WISCAs can assist in the decision-making process regarding empirical antibiotic therapy choices in cases of IFI.

In many vascular segments, endovascular therapy is the treatment of choice for arteriosclerotic lesions. For the treatment of common femoral artery (CFA) lesions, surgical reconstruction is still considered the gold standard. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stent angioplasty for the treatment of common femoral artery (CFA) lesions in a real-world population during a two-year follow up. This retrospective, single-center study includes 250 patients requiring treatment with stent angioplasty of CFA lesions. The primary end point was the target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate. Secondary end points were the overall procedural complication rate, the rate of ipsilateral CFA punctures during follow-up, changes in the Rutherford–Becker class (RBC) and ankle–brachial index (ABI), primary patency rates, amputation rate, time to and the type of TLR. A total of 236 interventions (94.4%) were successfully defined as a residual stenosis < 30%. Periinterventionally, there were 23 complications (9.1%), 3 of which had to be treated surgically. Median follow up was 21 months (average 19.2 ± 7.8). In total, 41 patients (16.4%) needed a TLR. The primary patency rate was 90.8%, 81.2% and 72% at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. ABI and RBC were significantly better at all time points compared to baseline. During follow up, seven amputations (three minor and four major) had to be performed. More than half of the patients (56.0%) were punctured at the stented CFA during the follow up. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed continued nicotine use and coronary heart disease as predictors for TLR. Stent angioplasty for the treatment of CFA lesions is safe and effective. Further studies are needed to compare this endovascular option with surgical therapy.

Background: The femoropopliteal arteries are commonly affected by atherosclerotic lesions. The use of atherectomy may increase the benefit of definitive therapy, such as drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. Purpose: To analyze the 2-year safety and efficacy of atherectomy in general and stratified by directional atherectomy (DA) and front-cutting atherectomy (FA) for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions of the femoropopliteal arteries. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed including patients who underwent vessel preparation with atherectomy. The primary endpoint was the 2-year incidence of target lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary endpoints included primary patency, changes in ankle-brachial index (ABI) and Rutherford-Becker class (RBC), and amputation rate up to 2 years. Results: Nine hundred and fifty-five patients (37.8% female; mean age: 69.7±9.6 years) were included in this analysis. Eight hundred and twenty-one patients (86%) were claudicants, 134 patients (14%) had critical limb-threatening ischemia. Six hundred and forty-four lesions (67.4%) were in a native artery and 145 lesions (15.2%) were in-stent restenoses. In 166 patients (17.4%), atherectomy was performed in native and in-stent segments. Eight hundred and thirty-seven patients were treated with DA and 118 patients with FA. Five-hundred and seventy-four procedures (60.1%) were followed by DCB angioplasty, provisional stent rate was 20% overall. One hundred and fifty-four procedure-related adverse events (16.1%) were documented, four complications (0.4%) required surgical intervention. At 2 years, 279 patients (34.3%) required TLR. After DA, TLR rates were 9%, 19.5%, and 32.2% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, and 14.2%, 29.4%, and 49%, at 6, 12, and 24 months after FA. After DA, primary patency rates were 75.9%, 57.4%, and 40.3% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, and 64.9%, 44.8%, and 26%, at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, after FA. Mean ABI and mean RBC improved significantly during follow-up (p<0.001), 17 patients required amputation, 13 minor (1.6%) and four major (0.5%). Regression analysis shows that more calcified lesions are more likely to have a TLR. Compared with a vessel diameter of 4 mm or smaller, larger diameters are associated with fewer TLRs. Conclusion: In this retrospective analysis, atherectomy of femoropopliteal lesions shows satisfactory mid-term results. Clinical Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00031245 Clinical Impact: The results of this analysis could influence the daily practice of the interventionalists. A combination of atherectomy as vessel preparation followed by drug coated balloon angioplasty appears to be promising, but would need to be investigated in randomised trials.

Purpose: To evaluate the potential differences in characteristics of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR) stratified by stent design with a focus on the swirling flow-inducing BioMimics 3D helical centerline stent. Methods: Patients with ISR of the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries undergoing reintervention were included in this study. The primary endpoint was the angiographic localization and extent of restenosis or reocclusion with the following five different stent systems: SMART Control stent, Supera peripheral stent, GORE^® VIABAHN^® endoprosthesis, BioMimics 3D stent, and Zilver^® PTX^® stent. Results: 414 ISR lesions were analyzed, affecting 236 Supera stents, 67 BioMimics 3D stents, 48 Zilver^® PTX^® stents, 38 SMART Control stents, and 25 VIABAHN^® endoprostheses. The mean stent diameter and length were 5.7 ± 0.77 mm and 121.4 ± 94.8 mm, respectively. ISR included 310 (74.9%) lesions with 1 stent, 89 (21.5%) lesions with 2 stents, 14 (3.4%) lesions with 3 stents, and 1 lesion (0.2%) with 4 stents. Most lesions presented as reocclusions (67.4%) rather than focal (13.3%) or diffuse restenoses (19.3%). No significant differences in ISR lesion morphology were found. By trend, BioMimics 3D stent lesion extension was more focal (16.4% versus 12.7%, p = 0.258), with the highest proportion of lesions in which only the proximal stent third was affected (9.0% versus 5.8%, p = 0.230), as compared to the average of the other four devices. The occlusion rate was the second lowest for the BioMimics 3D stent (64.2 vs. 68.0%, p = 0.316). Risk factors for restenosis or occlusion were active smoking, pre-interventional occlusion, and popliteal intervention. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the helical centerline stent design of the BioMimics 3D stent, which results in a swirling flow with increased wall shear stress, may offer protective properties over straight stent designs, including DES and endoprosthesis, regarding localization and extension of restenosis. Prospective, randomized studies are warranted.

Purpose: Vessel recoil is a common phenomenon occurring in the tibial vessels following balloon angioplasty. This study examined the occurrence and short-term impact of acute vessel recoil in a subset of patients treated with retrievable scaffold therapy (RST) via the Spur Peripheral Retrievable Scaffold System (Spur). Methods: Patients with tibial disease underwent angiography immediately following RST, and then 15 minutes post-treatment. Vessel recoil was defined as a ≥10% decrease in lumen diameter after 15 minutes. Recoil was further analyzed by late lumen loss method, subsegmental late lumen loss method, and smallest segment to same segment method. Patient and vessel characteristics were evaluated. Functional recoil (acute vessel spasm), defined as no significant change in minimal lumen diameter (MLD) at baseline compared with 15 minutes post-treatment, was also evaluated. Results: Of the 38 patients (40 lesions; 33 men [87%]; mean [SD] age 75.3 [8.2] years; 26 (68.4%) with diabetes mellitus); recoil was noted in 42.5% of vessels. Prior to treatment, 13 lesions (32.5%) were total occlusions, the mean lesion length was 64.7±30.4 mm, and 27.5% (11/40) were moderate or severely calcified. Mean treated lesion length was 97.8±39.6 mm. For lesions evaluable by duplex ultrasound, 86.7% of vessels (26/30) were patent at 6 months. There was no significant difference in patency between lesions with recoil and lesions without recoil (81.8% vs 89.5%); there was a trend toward patency in the non-recoil group. Two lesions had functional recoil (acute vessel spasm) and were patent at 6 months. There was no statistically significant correlation of recoil to comorbidities or lesion characteristics, including calcification, for which there was also no correlation to patency. Conclusion: Vessel recoil was noted in 42.5% of vessels treated with RST, whereas previous published rates with balloon angioplasty demonstrated vessel recoil up to 97%, suggesting that RST may impact vessel recoil. This exploratory study did not demonstrate a correlation between vessel recoil and patency at 6 months. Clinical Impact: Retrievable scaffold therapy may replace scoring devices and cutting devices for vessel preparation before definite (drug) therapy. Retrievable scaffold therapy supplements already established vessel preparation strategies in order to follow the concept of leaving nothing behaind. A temporary retrievable scaffold for changing vessel compliance and potentially releasing antiproliferative drugs represents a new interventional concept.