Background Transplant type for end‐stage pulmonary vascular disease remains debatable. We compared recipient outcome after heart‐lung(HLT) versus double‐lung(DLT) transplantation. Methods Single‐center analysis (38HLT‐30DLT; 1991‐2014] for different causes of pre‐capillary pulmonary hypertension(PH): idiopathic(22); heritable(2); drug‐induced(9); hepato‐portal(1); connective tissue disease(4); congenital heart disease(CHD)(24); chronic thromboembolic PH(6). Results HLT decreased from 91.7% [1991‐1995] to 21.4% [2010‐2014]. Re‐intervention for bleeding was higher after HLT; (p=0.06) while primary graft dysfunction grades 2&3 occurred more after DLT; (p<0.0001). Graft survival at 90 days, 1, 5, 10, and 15 years was 93%, 83%, 70%, 47%, and 35% for DLT versus 82%, 74%, 61%, 48%, and 30% for HLT, respectively (log rank p=0.89). Graft survival improved over time: 100%, 93%, 87%, 72%, and 72% in [2010‐2014] versus 75%, 58%, 42%, 33%, and 33% in [1991‐1995], respectively; p=0.03. No difference in chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)‐free survival was observed: 80% & 28% for DLT versus 75% & 28% for HLT after 5 and 10 years, respectively; p=0.49. Conclusions Primary graft dysfunction in PH patients was lower after HLT compared to DLT. Nonetheless, overall graft and CLAD‐free survival were comparable and improved over time with growing experience. DLT remains our preferred procedure for all forms of pre‐capillary PH, except in patients with complex CHD.