Takuma Ii

Dr. Takuma Ii


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 November 2024 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KKKei Kiyono
Kei Kiyono
STShigeo Tanabe
Shigeo Tanabe
SHSatoshi Hirano
Satoshi Hirano
TITakuma Ii
Takuma Ii
YNYuki Nakagawa
Yuki Nakagawa
YOYohei Otaka
Yohei Otaka
Background/Objectives: Clinical trials have investigated the efficacy of rehabilitation robotics for various pathological conditions, but the overall impact on rehabilitation practice remains unclear. We comprehensively examined and analyzed systematic reviews (SRs) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating rehabilitative interventions with robotic devices. Methods: Four databases were searched using term combinations of keywords related to robotic devices, rehabilitation, and SRs. The SR meta-analyses were categorized into “convincing”, “highly suggestive”, “suggestive”, “weak”, or “non-significant” depending on evidence strength and validity. Results: Overall, 62 SRs of 341 RCTs involving 14,522 participants were identified. Stroke was most frequently reported (40 SRs), followed by spinal cord injury (eight SRs), multiple sclerosis (four SRs), cerebral palsy (four SRs), Parkinson’s disease (three SRs), and neurological disease (any disease causing limited upper- and lower-limb functioning; three SRs). Furthermore, 38, 21, and 3 SRs focused on lower-limb devices, upper-limb devices, and both upper- and lower-limb devices, respectively. Quantitative synthesis of robotic intervention effects was performed by 51 of 62 SRs. Robot-assisted training was effective for various outcome measures per disease. Meta-analyses offering suggestive evidence were limited to studies on stroke. Upper-limb devices were effective for motor control and activities of daily living, and lower-limb devices for walking independence in stroke. Conclusions: Robotic devices are useful for improving impairments and disabilities in several diseases. Further high-quality SRs including RCTs with large sample sizes and meta-analyses of these RCTs, particularly on non-stroke-related diseases, are required. Further research should also ascertain which type of robotic device is the most effective for improving each specific impairment or disability.

18 February 2024 in The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TITakuma Ii
Takuma Ii
SHSatoshi Hirano
Satoshi Hirano
脳卒中後の片麻痺者における歩行障害はリハビリテーション治療の重要なテーマである.これまでに歩行練習の方法が多く提案され,効果が検証されているが,身体機能や歩行能力,発症後の時期に応じて練習目的や適応は異なり,対象に応じた内容の選定が必要である.本稿では,脳卒中治療ガイドラインで推奨されている下肢装具やトレッドミル,機能的電気刺激を用いた歩行練習の有用性について紹介する.また,近年注目されているロボットを用いた歩行練習についても臨床効果や作用機序を解説し,活用方法についても紹介する.

13 January 2023 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KFKenta Fujimura
Kenta Fujimura
HSHiroaki Sakurai
Hiroaki Sakurai
SKSoichiro Koyama
Soichiro Koyama
KTKazuya Takeda
Kazuya Takeda
TITakuma Ii
Takuma Ii
YKYoshikiyo Kanada
Yoshikiyo Kanada
The number of post-graduate rehabilitation therapists (novice therapists) is increasing due to the growing demand for rehabilitation services in Japan. This study investigated the acquisition status of Japanese novice therapists’ basic clinical skills to clarify their quality and characteristics. Eleven participants’ basic clinical skills (eight physical and three occupational therapists) were assessed using an Objective Structured Clinical Examination. Tasks included exercises of joint range of motion, muscle strengthening, getting up, standing up and sitting down, and transferring between wheelchair and bed. Assessment items were subdivided into categories: attitude, preparation, intervention, safety management, and feedback. One-way ANOVA and Friedman test were used for statistical analysis to compare the data between tasks and categories. The scores for each task’s achievement rate were not statistically significant. However, the achievement rate of each category including tasks was 92.6% (SD 4.0%) for attitude, 81.4% (SD 11.1%) for preparation, 77.9% (SD 14.7%) for intervention, 87.6% (SD 17.3%) for safety management, and 64.0% (SD 14.2%) for feedback. There were significant differences between attitude and feedback (p < 0.001), and between safety management and feedback (p = 0.012). Post-graduate training programs should focus on improving the quality of clinical skills, especially in skills related to feedback.