Hongxi Liu

Dr. Hongxi Liu

Research and Development Center for Watershed Environmental Eco-Engineering, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai, China

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2016 in CATENA
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HLHongxi Liu
Hongxi Liu
Sergey BlagodatskySergey Blagodatsky
Sergey Blagodatsky
MGMarcus Giese
Marcus Giese
FLFeng Liu
Feng Liu
JXJianchu Xu
Jianchu Xu
GCGeorg Cadisch
Georg Cadisch

1 October 2022 in Journal of Semiconductors
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HZHongchao Zhang
Hongchao Zhang
XMXiangyue Ma
Xiangyue Ma
CJChuanpeng Jiang
Chuanpeng Jiang
JYJialiang Yin
Jialiang Yin
SLShuqin Lyu
Shuqin Lyu
WZWeisheng ZHAO
Weisheng ZHAO
We demonstrate in-plane field-free-switching spin-orbit torque (SOT) magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) devices that are capable of low switching current density, fast speed, high reliability, and, most importantly, manufactured uniformly by the 200-mm-wafer platform. The performance of the devices is systematically studied, including their magnetic properties, switching behaviors, endurance and data retention. The successful integration of SOT devices within the 200-mm-wafer manufacturing platform provides a feasible way to industrialize SOT MRAMs. It is expected to obtain excellent performance of the devices by further optimizing the MTJ film stacks and the corresponding fabrication processes in the future.

1 May 2021 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XZXiaoxin Zhang
Xiaoxin Zhang
YYYujun Yi
Yujun Yi
YYYing Yang
Ying Yang
HLHongxi Liu
Hongxi Liu
ZYZhifeng Yang
Zhifeng Yang

9 February 2025 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XGXiaoqun Guo
Xiaoqun Guo
YLYanjin Liu
Yanjin Liu
Tian XieTian Xie
Tian Xie
YLYina Li
Yina Li
HLHongxi Liu
Hongxi Liu
Qing WangQing Wang
Qing Wang
Reducing carbon emissions and increasing carbon sinks have become the core issues of the international community. Although coastal blue carbon ecosystems (such as mangroves, seagrass beds, coastal salt marshes and large algae) account for less than 0.5% of the seafloor area, they contain more than 50% of marine carbon reserves, occupying an important position in the global carbon cycle. However, with the rapid development of the economy and the continuous expansion of human activities, coastal wetlands have suffered serious damage, and their carbon sequestration capacity has been greatly limited. Ecological restoration has emerged as a key measure to reverse this trend. Through a series of measures, including restoring the hydrological conditions of damaged wetlands, cultivating suitable plant species, effectively managing invasive species and rebuilding habitats, ecological restoration is committed to restoring the ecological functions of wetlands and increasing their ecological service value. Therefore, this paper first reviews the research status and influencing factors of coastal wetland carbon sinks, discusses the objectives, types and measures of various coastal wetland ecological restoration projects, analyzes the impact of these ecological restoration projects on wetland carbon sink function, and proposes suggestions for incorporating carbon sink enhancement into wetland ecological restoration.

20 November 2024 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XXXiaolin Xu
Xiaolin Xu
DLDan Li
Dan Li
HLHongxi Liu
Hongxi Liu
GZGuang Zhao
Guang Zhao
Baoshan CuiBaoshan Cui
Baoshan Cui
JDJizeng Du
Jizeng Du
Land cover maps with high accuracy are essential for environmental protection and climate change research. The 30-meter-resolution maps, with their better resolution and longer historical records, are extensively utilized to assess changes in land cover and their effects on carbon storage, land–atmosphere energy balance, and water cycle processes. However, current data products use different classification methods, resulting in significant classification inconsistency and triggering serious disagreements among related studies. Here, we compared four mainstream land cover products in China, namely GLC_FCS30, CLCD, Globeland30, and CNLUCC. The result shows that only 50.34% of the classification results were consistent across the four datasets. The differences between pairs of datasets ranged from 21.10% to 37.53%. Importantly, most inconsistency occurs in transitional zones among land cover types sensitive to climate change and human activities. Based on the accuracy evaluation, CLCD is the most accurate land cover product, with an overall accuracy reaching 86.98 ± 0.76%, followed by CNLUCC (81.38 ± 0.87%) and GLC_FCS30 (77.83 ± 0.80%). Globeland30 had the lowest accuracy (75.24 ± 0.91%), primarily due to misclassification between croplands and forests. Misclassification diagnoses revealed that vegetation-related spectral confusion among land cover types contributed significantly to misclassifications, followed by slope, cloud cover, and landscape fragmentation, which affected satellite observation angles, data availability, and mixed pixels. Automated classification methods using the random forest algorithm can perform better than those that depend on traditional human–machine interactive interpretation or object-based approaches. However, their classification accuracy depends more on selecting training samples and feature variables.

1 March 2013 in Vacuum
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HLHongxi Liu
Hongxi Liu
XQXu Qian
Xu Qian
XDXiong Damin
Xiong Damin
LBLin Bo
Lin Bo
MCMeng Chunlei
Meng Chunlei