Gang Wang

Dr. Gang Wang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 May 2016 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YBYang Bai
Yang Bai
YLYunfeng Lu
Yunfeng Lu
Pengcheng HuPengcheng Hu
Pengcheng Hu
GWGang Wang
Gang Wang
JXJinxin Xu
Jinxin Xu
JTJiubin Tan
Jiubin Tan
A simple differential capacitive sensor is provided in this paper to measure the absolute positions of length measuring systems. By utilizing a shield window inside the differential capacitor, the measurement range and linearity range of the sensor can reach several millimeters. What is more interesting is that this differential capacitive sensor is only sensitive to one translational degree of freedom (DOF) movement, and immune to the vibration along the other two translational DOFs. In the experiment, we used a novel circuit based on an AC capacitance bridge to directly measure the differential capacitance value. The experimental result shows that this differential capacitive sensor has a sensitivity of 2 × 10−4 pF/μm with 0.08 μm resolution. The measurement range of this differential capacitive sensor is 6 mm, and the linearity error are less than 0.01% over the whole absolute position measurement range.

15 January 2024 in Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GWGang Wang
Gang Wang
CYChunlai Yu
Chunlai Yu
KGKai Guo
Kai Guo
HGHaisong Guo
Haisong Guo
YWYibo Wang
Yibo Wang
To improve the performance of the calibration model for the air quality monitoring, a low-cost multi-parameter air quality monitoring system (LCS) based on different machine learning algorithms is proposed. The LCS can measure particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) and gas pollutants (SO2, NO2, CO and O3) simultaneously. The multi-input multi-output (MIMO) prediction model is developed based on the original signals of the sensors, ambient temperature (T) and relative humidity (RH), and the measurements of the reference instrumentations. The performance of the different algorithms (RF, MLR, KNN, BP, GA–BP) with parameters such as determination coefficient R2, root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) are compared and discussed. Using these methods, the R2 of the algorithms (RF, MLR, KNN, BP, GA–BP) for the PM is in the range 0.68–0.99; the RMSE values of PM2.5 and PM10 are within 2.36–18.68 and 4.55–45.05 µg m−3, respectively; the MAE values of PM2.5 and PM10 are within 1.44–12.80 and 3.21–23.20 µg m−3, respectively. The R2 of the algorithms (RF, MLR, KNN, BP, GA–BP) for the gas pollutants (O3, CO and NO2) is within 0.70–0.99; the RMSE values for these pollutants are 4.05–17.79 µg m−3, 0.02–0.18 mg m−3, 2.88–14.54 µg m−3, respectively; the MAE values for these pollutants are 2.76–13.46 µg m−3, 0.02–0.19 mg m−3, 1.84–11.08 µg m−3, respectively. The R2 of the algorithms (RF, KNN, BP, GA–BP, except for MLR) for SO2 is within 0.27–0.97, the RMSE value is in the range 0.64–5.37 µg m−3, and the MAE value is in the range 0.39–4.24 µg m−3. These measurements are consistent with the national environmental protection standard requirement of China, and the LCS based on the machine learning algorithms can be used to predict the concentrations of PM and gas pollution.

13 October 2023 in EGUsphere
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
GWGang Wang
Gang Wang
CYChunlai Yu
Chunlai Yu
KGKai Guo
Kai Guo
HGHaisong Guo
Haisong Guo
YWYibo Wang
Yibo Wang
To improve the prediction for the future air quality trends, the demand for low-cost sensor-based air quality gird monitoring is growing gradually. In this study, a low-cost multi-parameter air quality monitoring system (LCS) based on different machine learning algorithm is proposed. The LCS can measure particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) and gas pollutants (SO2, NO2, CO and O3) simultaneously. The multi-dimensional multi-response prediction model is developed based on the original signals of the sensors, ambient temperature (T) and relative humidity (RH), and the measurements of the reference instrumentations. The performance of the different algorithms (RF, MLR, KNN, BP, GA-BP) with the parameters such as determination coefficient R2 and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) are compared and discussed. Using these methods, the R2 of the algorithms (RF, MLR, KNN, BP, GA-BP) for the PM is in the range 0.68–0.99; the mean RMSE values of PM2.5 and PM10 are within 3.96–16.16 μgm-3 and 7.37–28.90 μgm-3, respectively. The R2 of the algorithms (RF, MLR, KNN, BP, GA-BP) for the gas pollutants (O3, CO and NO2) is within 0.70–0.99; the mean RMSE values for these pollutants are 4.06–16.07 μgm-3, 0.04–0.15 mgm-3, 3.25–13.90 μgm-3, respectively. The R2 of the algorithms (RF, KNN, BP, GA-BP, except for MLR) for SO2 is within 0.27–0.97, and the mean RMSE value is in the range 1.05–3.22 μgm-3. These measurements are consistent with the national environmental protection standard requirement of China, and the LCS based on the machine learning algorithms can be used to predict the concentrations of PM and gas pollution.