Recently WHO has declared novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak a pandemic. Acute respiratory syndrome seems to be the most common manifestation of COVID-19. Besides pneumonia, it has been demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 infection affects multiple organs, including brain tissues, causing different neurological manifestations, especially acute cerebrovascular disease (ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke), impaired consciousness and skeletal muscle injury. To our knowledge, among neurological disorders associated with SARS-CoV2 infection, no Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) has been described yet. Herein, we report a case of a 64-year old woman with COVID19 infection who developed a PRES, and we suggest that it could be explained by the disruption of the blood brain barrier induced by the cerebrovascular endothelial dysfunction caused by SARS-CoV-2.

Brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is a common comorbidity in patients with brain neoplasms and it may be either the first symptom or develop after the tumor diagnosis. Increasing evidence suggests that brain tumors and BTRE share common pathophysiological mechanisms. Glutamatergic mechanisms can play a central role in promoting both primary brain tumor growth and epileptogenesis. Perampanel (PER), which acts as a selective antagonist of glutamate α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors, may play a role both in the reduction in tumor growth and the control of epileptiform activity. This systematic review aimed to summarize the pre-clinical and clinical evidence about the antitumor properties, antiseizure effects and tolerability of PER in BTRE. Eight pre-clinical and eight clinical studies were identified. The currently available evidence suggests that PER can be an effective and generally well-tolerated therapeutic option in patients with BTRE. In vitro studies demonstrated promising antitumor activity of PER, while no role in slowing tumor progression has been demonstrated in rat models; clinical data on the potential antitumor activity of PER are scarce. Additional studies are needed to explore further the effects of PER on tumor progression and fully characterize its potentialities in patients with BTRE.

Both the role and the importance of magnesium in clinical practice have grown considerably in recent years. Emerging evidence suggests an association between loss of magnesium homeostasis and increased mortality in the critical care setting. The underlying mechanism is still unclear, but an increasing number of in vivo and in vitro studies on magnesium’s immunomodulating capabilities may shed some light on the matter. This review aims to discuss the evidence behind magnesium homeostasis in critically ill patients, and its link with intensive care unit mortality via a likely magnesium-induced dysregulation of the immune response. The underlying pathogenetic mechanisms, and their implications for clinical outcomes, are discussed. The available evidence strongly supports the crucial role of magnesium in immune system regulation and inflammatory response. The loss of magnesium homeostasis has been associated with an elevated risk of bacterial infections, exacerbated sepsis progression, and detrimental effects on the cardiac, respiratory, neurological, and renal systems, ultimately leading to increased mortality. However, magnesium supplementation has been shown to be beneficial in these conditions, highlighting the importance of maintaining adequate magnesium levels in the intensive care setting.

Recently, a subset of patients affected by cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) distinguished by atypical juvenile onset and a hypothesized iatrogenic origin (iatrogenic CAA, iCAA) has emerged. β-Amyloid (Aβ) accumulation evidenced by amyloid PET positivity or CSF Aβ decrease was included in the iCAA diagnostic criteria. Conversely, diagnostic criteria for sporadic CAA (sCAA) do not involve biomarker analysis. The aim of this study was to assess CSF and plasma levels of Aβ and tau in iCAA and sCAA cohorts. Patients affected by probable or possible CAA according to established criteria (Boston 2.0) were prospectively recruited at Fondazione IRCCS Carlo Besta and San Gerardo dei Tintori from May 2021 to January 2024. Patients with probable and possible iCAA or sCAA with available plasma and/or CSF samples were included. Clinical and neurologic data were collected, and levels of Aβ40, Aβ42, total tau, and phospho-tau (p-tau) were assessed in CSF and plasma by SiMoA and Lumipulse. 21 patients with iCAA (72% male, mean age at symptom onset 50 years [36-74]) and 32 patients with sCAA (44% male, mean age at symptom onset 68 years [52-80]) were identified. Cognitive impairment and cardiovascular risk factors in the sCAA cohort were more common compared with the iCAA cohort. Patients with sCAA and iCAA showed similar CSF levels for Aβ40 (p = 0.5 [sCAA, 95% CI 2,604-4,228; iCAA, 95% CI 1,958-3,736]), Aβ42 (p = 0.7 [sCAA, 95% CI 88-157; iCAA, 95% CI 83-155]), and total tau (p = 0.08 [sCAA, 95% CI 80-134; iCAA, 95% CI 37-99]). Plasma levels of Aβ40 (p = 0.08, 95% CI 181-222), Aβ42 (p = 0.3, 95% CI 6-8), and total tau (p = 0.4, 95% CI 3-6) were not statistically different in patients with sCAA compared with iCAA ones (Aβ40, 95% CI 153-193; Aβ42, 95% CI 6-7 and total tau, 95% CI 2-4). Despite presenting with a younger age at onset, fewer cardiovascular risk factors, and lower cognitive impairment, patients with iCAA demonstrated Aβ and tau levels comparable with elderly patients with sCAA, supporting a common molecular paradigm between the 2 CAA forms.