Bo Chen

Dr. Bo Chen


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2013 in Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BCBo Chen
Bo Chen
CCChao Chen
Chao Chen
MKMikhail K. Kaban
Mikhail K. Kaban
JDJinsong Du
Jinsong Du
QLQing Liang
Qing Liang
MTMaik Thomas
Maik Thomas

3 February 2020 in Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GZGuangdong Zhao
Guangdong Zhao
JLJianxin Liu
Jianxin Liu
BCBo Chen
Bo Chen
MKMikhail.K. Kaban
Mikhail.K. Kaban
XZXuanyu Zheng
Xuanyu Zheng
We use the improved Parker−Oldenburg's formulas that include a reference depth into the exponential term and employ the Gauss‐FFT method to determine Moho depth beneath the Tibetan Plateau. The synthetic models demonstrate that the improved Parker's formula has high accuracy with the maximum absolute error less than 0.25 mGal compared to the analytical solution. Two inversion parameters, i.e., the reference depth and the density contrast are essential for the Moho estimation based on the gravity field, and they need to be determined in advance to obtain correct results. Therefore, the Moho estimates derived from existing seismic studies are used to reduce the non‐uniqueness of the gravity inversion and to determine these parameters by searching for the maximum correlation between the gravity‐inverted and seismic‐derived Moho depths. Another critical issue is to remove beforehand the gravity effects of other factors, which affect the observed gravity field besides Moho variations. In addition to the topography, the gravity effects of the sedimentary layer and crystalline crust are removed based on existing crustal models, while the upper mantle impact is determined based on the seismic tomography model. The inversion results show that the Moho structure under the Tibetan plateau is very complex with the depths varying from about 30 ~ 40 km in the surrounding basins (e.g., Ganges basin, Sichuan basin, and Tarim basin) to 60 ~ 80 km within the plateau. This considerable difference up to 40 km on the Moho depth reveals the substantial uplift and thickening of the crust in the Tibetan Plateau. Furthermore, two visible “Moho depression belts” are observed within the plateau with the maximum Moho deepening along the Indus‐Tsangpo Suture and along the northern margin of Tibet bounding the Tarim basin with the relatively shallow Moho in central Tibet between them. The southern “belt” is likely formed in compressional environment, where the Indian plate underthrusts northwards beneath the Tibetan Plateau, while the northern one could be formed by the southward underthrust of the Asian lithosphere beneath Tibet.

1 July 2015 in Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YSYa Sun
Ya Sun
JLJianxin Liu
Jianxin Liu
KZKeping Zhou
Keping Zhou
BCBo Chen
Bo Chen
RGRongwen Guo
Rongwen Guo

17 April 2015 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BCBo Chen
Bo Chen
MKMikhail K. Kaban
Mikhail K. Kaban
SESami Ahmed Elkhrepy
Sami Ahmed Elkhrepy
NANassir saad Alarifi
Nassir saad Alarifi
The fan wavelet method has been employed to calculate high‐resolution maps of variations of the effective elastic thickness (EET) for the Arabian plate and surroundings. As the initial data, we use high‐resolution gravity field, topography, and recent models of sedimentary basins. The western part of the plate is generally characterized by low to midvalues of EET (10–30 km) while the eastern one by high values (50 km and more in the core). This finding confirms that the pronounced asymmetry of the plate is rather associated with fundamental structural differences of the lithosphere than with a forced tilt of the plate due to the rifting in the west‐southwest and subduction in the northeast. Therefore, the high topography in the western part of the plate is likely supported by relatively hot mantle that is also responsible for the decrease of EET. These results are generally in agreement with recent seismic tomography models.

1 January 2015 in Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BCBo Chen
Bo Chen
JLJianxin Liu
Jianxin Liu
CCChao Chen
Chao Chen
JDJinsong Du
Jinsong Du
YSYa Sun
Ya Sun

1 March 2018 in Journal of Applied Geophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GZGuangdong Zhao
Guangdong Zhao
BCBo Chen
Bo Chen
LCLongwei Chen
Longwei Chen
JLJianxin Liu
Jianxin Liu
ZRZhengyong Ren
Zhengyong Ren