The emergency department (ED) is the first contact of many individuals who require acute health services. This study was the first to be conducted among patients in different regions of Saudi Arabia to determine patient satisfaction with emergency healthcare services using the Arabic version of the Echelle de Qualité des Soins en Hospitalisation (EQS-H). This cross-sectional study was conducted among 2,997 patients admitted to the ED in different hospitals in different regions of Saudi Arabia. The study was based on a self-reported questionnaire validated to assess the satisfaction of patients with ED healthcare services called EQS-H. In this study, we used an Arabic version of the questionnaire. Statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.6.3. The study was conducted among 2,997 patients (36.7% males and 63.3% females). Regarding region, respondents from the central region represented one-third of the sample (31.7%), followed by respondents from the western, eastern, and southern regions (24.1%, 16.9%, and 14.6%, respectively). Statistical analysis showed that the average percentage score for the clarity of information was significantly higher in the central region than in other regions and was lowest in the eastern region. Individuals aged 26-35 years (B = -2.54 and P < 0.05), male sex (B = -1.63 and P < 0.05), Saudis (B = -3.81 and P < 0.05), longer ED length of stay (LOS) (B = -2.19 and P < 0.001), worse perceived health state, and lower life satisfaction scale scores were significantly associated with lower levels of satisfaction with ED services. Perceived improvement is the strongest predictor of satisfaction. Moderate satisfaction levels were reported in both the clarity of information domain and relationship with staff domain among patients admitted to EDs in different regions of Saudi Arabia, with better results in the central region.

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia was one of the countries earliest affected by the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and had taken precautions including compulsory COVID-19 vaccination. Both the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (Oxford AstraZeneca) and the BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer) were approved by the Saudi Ministry of Health, followed by mRNA-1273 (Moderna), all of which were used for population-wide vaccination. This study aimed to assess the short-term side effects following the COVID-19 vaccinations among participants who had received all three doses in the western region of Saudi Arabia. An online survey was distributed to the participants who received either BNT162b2, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, or mRNA-1273 vaccines, and the type of side effects and their severity were evaluated. Fatigue and headache, pain at the site of the injection and muscle pain were the most common side effects in all three doses. However, the severity depending on the type of vaccination was significant only for the first and second dose, but not the third dose. In contrast, there was a higher percentage of participants who encountered severe side effects from the third dose compared to the first and second. Nevertheless, the majority of participants described all three doses’ side effects to be moderately severe. A future evaluation could be made to access the individual types of vaccination and compare between the side effects of the BNT162b2, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, and mRNA-1273 vaccines specifically for the booster dose.

Background: Blood transfusion is a highly critical life-saving factor in neonates, especially in extremely low birth weight infants. There is a significant lack of consensus on optimal blood transfusion methods for neonates. Aim: To investigate and analyze blood transfusion practice in neonates among neonatologists and neonatal nurses in a multi-country pattern. Methods: From September 2023 to June 2024, a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted to collect data on global blood transfusion practices in neonates. A questionnaire, developed through an extensive literature review, was distributed to neonatologists and neonatal nurses primarily via e-mail, with additional distribution via social media platforms. Results: This study included a total of 180 neonatologists and neonatal nurses from 27 different countries. Almost 37.7% were working in a level 3 NICU. Approximately 37.7% of the participants stated that they transfuse blood within three hours, and approximately 45.5% stated they usually use 15 mL/kg of blood. After receiving a transfusion, 99.4% of the participants mentioned that they continue to check the vital signs. More than half (72.2%) of NICU practitioners use filters when giving blood. Regarding written instructions and guidelines in the unit for blood transfusion, the majority (84.4%) stated having them in their units, of which, 86.8% mentioned that blood transfusion threshold stated in the guidelines either using hemoglobin or hematocrit. Conclusions: This study found variability in blood transfusion practices around the world. While most have developed neonatal blood transfusion guidelines, certain countries still lack national protocols. Establishing comprehensive guidelines is essential to standardizing procedures, thereby minimizing the risk of inappropriate or unsafe blood transfusions in this neonatology practice.

Background/Objectives: Age-related hearing loss (ARHL) is a major and growing public health concern, yet awareness of its nature, consequences, and management options remains inadequately studied in the Middle Eastern context. In Saudi Arabia, cochlear implantation is provided free of charge through the public healthcare system; however, adult uptake remains critically low, suggesting that awareness—rather than access—constitutes the primary barrier to timely intervention. In collective healthcare cultures, family members play a central role in healthcare decision-making for older individuals, making family-level awareness a critical determinant of early identification and treatment. This study aimed to assess public awareness, beliefs, and attitudes toward ARHL and its management options among adults in Saudi Arabia, applying the Health Belief Model (HBM) as a theoretical framework. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted using a structured questionnaire adapted from a previously validated survey, with cultural modifications for the Saudi context. The questionnaire was distributed electronically to adults aged 18 years and above across Saudi Arabia. A total of 506 consenting responses were included in the final analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations. Results: The majority of participants correctly identified hearing loss as a reduction in the ability to hear (84.6%), and 95.3% regarded good hearing as personally important. However, significant knowledge gaps were observed, with 53.8% believing hearing loss can be cured and 50.4% believing it can be halted. Notably, 34.2% believed cochlear implants benefit children exclusively. Doctors and the internet were the primary sources of medical information, yet 39.3% reported no preventive healthcare visits and 23.9% did not seek any information about hearing problems. When faced with a hypothetical hearing loss, 75.3% indicated they would consult an ENT specialist. Conclusions: Adults in Saudi Arabia demonstrate good awareness of the signs and consequences of hearing loss but exhibit significant knowledge gaps regarding its clinical course and available management options, most notably the belief that cochlear implantation is exclusively a pediatric intervention. These findings highlight the urgent need for culturally adapted awareness campaigns targeting family members of older adults, and support the development of community-based hearing health promotion strategies in Saudi Arabia and comparable collective healthcare societies.