Objective: This study aims to prospectively compare endoscopic, radiological, and pathological features of a cohort of patients with glottic laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) undergoing open partial horizontal laryngectomy (OPHL) type II/III or total laryngectomy to better understand the reliability of preoperative endoscopy and computed tomography (CT) to predict the inferior paraglottic space (iPGS) involvement.Methods: We prospectively compared the endoscopic, radiological, and pathological findings in patients with glottic LSCC who underwent OPHL II/III, or total laryngectomy.Results: Endoscopy achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 87.2% for the anterior iPGS (iPGSa) and 86.1% for the posterior iPGS (iPGSp). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of histopathologic iPGSa involvement between reduced (85%—17/20 pts) and absent (92%—24/26 pts) vocal cord mobility (p = 0.39). CT alone did not improve the diagnostic performance of the endoscopy, reaching a diagnostic accuracy of 62.9% and 73.7% for the iPGSa and iPGSp, respectively. When endoscopy and CT were combined, the diagnostic performance improved for the iPGSp, achieving a sensitivity (Se), specificity (Spe), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%, 89.8%, 68.7%, and 100%, respectively. On the contrary, the combination of CT and endoscopy improved only the Se and NPV for the iPGSa with respect to the sole endoscopic assessment.Conclusions: Whenever motility impairment is present, a histopathologic invasion of the iPGS should be suspected. Endoscopic assessment of laryngeal motility achieved a satisfactory value of Se, Spe, PPV, and NPV in predicting the involvement of the iPGS. CT scan is still the mainstay imaging technique in the clinical staging of patients with LSCC.Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 133:1184–1190, 2023

Objective: Diffusion of endoscopic techniques for the resection of ethmoid bone malignancies through a transcribriform approach (TA) has raised new challenges regarding reconstruction options to reduce post‐operative complications. Although there is consensus on the advantages of vascularized flaps over free grafts for large defects, no standard protocol exists on reconstruction procedures. In addition, although the pedicled nasoseptal flap has been extensively discussed, few studies have been published on extranasal pedicled flaps. The aim of this manuscript is to provide a detailed description of a reconstruction technique for large anterior skull base defects with the pericranial flap as part of a multilayered reconstruction. Moreover, patients treated with this approach were retrospectively assessed for post‐operative complications.Methods: A detailed description of the reconstruction procedure as performed in our departments is provided. Pictures depicting the main surgical steps are also included. In addition, preliminary functional results from a retrospective series of patients who underwent a TA and subsequent pericranial flap‐based multilayer reconstruction for ethmoid roof malignancies between 2016 and 2022 at two institutional centers are reported.Results: 16 patients were included in the study. Nine patients (56.3%) underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. Two patients had a biochemically‐confirmed postoperative CSF leak. Only one of the two patients required surgical revision. During follow‐up (mean 13 months), no other early nor delayed complications were observed.Conclusion: A standardized surgical technique with pericranial flap as part of a multilayered reconstruction for large anterior skull base defects following resection of sinonasal malignancies is proposed, which appears to be a safe choice when endonasal flaps are not available.Level of Evidence: Level 4 Laryngoscope, 133:2942–2947, 2023

Background: To retrospectively evaluate oncological outcomes in two groups of patients with pT4aN0 glottic SCC treated with total laryngectomy (TL) and neck dissection (ND) who underwent postoperative radiotherapy or exclusive clinical and radiological follow‐up.Methods: It includes patients with pT4N0 glottic SCC who underwent TL and unilateral or bilateral ND with or without PORT. Divided in two comparison groups: the first group underwent adjuvant RT (TL‐PORT); the second group referred to clinical and radiological follow‐up (TL).Results: PORT was associated with a better OS while no differences were found in terms of DSS. A better local control is achieved when PORT is administered while no differences in terms of regional and distant control rates were found. Bilateral ND positively impacts on the regional control while the PNI negatively impact the regional control.Conclusions: A tailored PORT protocol might be considered for pT4N0 glottic SCC treated with TL and ND, both considering the ND's extent and presence of PNI.

Background: Oncological surgery of the parotid gland or of the temporal bone may require the contemporary sacrifice of the facial nerve (FN). In such cases, the immediate repair of the sacrificed FN is recommended. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of facial rehabilitation (FR) and, secondarily, of post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) on the FN outcome after FN sacrifice and reconstruction via cable graft. Methods: This is a multicentric retrospective study including patients affected by malignant tumors whose surgical excision required FN sacrifice and contextual FN reconstruction with a cable graft. Other FN reconstruction techniques were excluded. FN function was assessed using both House–Brackmann and Sunnybrook grading systems. Results: A total of 28 patients were included. Most of the patients underwent a total parotidectomy. The greater auricular nerve was the main donor for cable graft. FR and PORT were performed in 22 and 15 patients, respectively. In particular, 20 patients underwent neuro-muscular retraining (NMR). Patients who underwent FR had better FN outcomes compared to those who did not (p = 0.02 at 12 months and p = 0.0002 at 24 months). In contrast, there was no statistically significant difference between patients who underwent PORT and those who did not (p > 0.05). Pre-operative FN palsy is a risk factor of worse FN function outcomes after cable graft. Conclusions: Our study, even though it was limited to only 28 cases, may demonstrate that cable graft failure is not due to PORT, as widely believed among clinicians, but to the absence of a rehabilitation program. Moreover, we suggest that the key to obtaining the best possible FN function results after FN sacrifice is the association of a technically correct FN reconstruction with a proper and targeted FR.