Harisha CB

Dr. Harisha CB

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 February 2023 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HCHarisha CB
Harisha CB
VNVijaykumar B. Narayanpur
Vijaykumar B. Narayanpur
JRJagadish Rane
Jagadish Rane
VGVasant Magundappa Ganiger
Vasant Magundappa Ganiger
SPSugooru M. Prasanna
Sugooru M. Prasanna
HEHosam O. Elansary
Hosam O. Elansary
Appropriate water management practices are essential for the successful cultivation of chia in water-scarce situations of semiarid regions. This is highly essential when new crops such as chia are introduced for ensuring diversity and water saving. Therefore, field trials (2020–21 and 2021–22) were conducted to understand the impact of deficit irrigation and bioregulators (BRs) on the seed yield, water productivity, and oil quality of chia. The effect of foliar application of BRs such as thiourea (TU; 400 ppm), salicylic acid (SA; 1.0 mM), potassium nitrate (KN; 0.15%), potassium silicate (KS; 100 ppm), kaolin (KO; 5%), and sodium benzoate (SB; 200 ppm) were monitored at different levels of irrigation: 100 (I100), 75 (I75), 50 (I50), and 25 (I25) percent of cumulative pan evaporation (CPE). Deficit irrigation at I25, I50, and I75 led to 55.3, 20.1, and 3.3% reductions in seed yield; 42.5, 22.5, and 4.2% in oil yield; and 58.9, 24.5, and 5.7% in omega–3 yield, respectively, relative to I100. Bioregulators could reduce the adverse impact of water deficit stress on seed, oil, and omega–3 yield. However, their beneficial effect was more conspicuous under mild water stress (I75), as revealed by higher seed yield (4.3–6.9%), oil yield (4.4–7.1%), and omega–3 yield (4.7–8.5%) over control (I100 + no BRs). Further, BRs (KN, TU, and SA) maintained oil quality in terms of linolenic acid and polyunsaturated fatty acid contents, even under mild stress (I75). Foliar application of KN, TU, and SA could save water to an extent of 36–40%. Therefore, the adverse impact of deficit irrigation on seed, oil, and omega–3 yields of chia could be minimized using BRs such as KN, TU, and SA, which can also contribute to improved water productivity.

20 January 2024 in Horticulturae
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HCHarisha CB
Harisha CB
JRJagadish Rane
Jagadish Rane
GGGopikunte Ramegowda Halagunde Gowda
Gopikunte Ramegowda Halagunde Gowda
Sangram Bhanudas ChavanSangram Bhanudas Chavan
Sangram Bhanudas Chavan
ACAMRESH CHAUDHARY
AMRESH CHAUDHARY
KRKotha Sammi Reddy
Kotha Sammi Reddy
Intercropping offers greater scope to introduce new crops. Cultivation of crops with diverse root architecture and different durations enhances the productivity of scarce resources like land and water. This study aimed to determine the effect of intercrop competition and irrigation regimes on yield, competition, land usage, irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), and fatty acids of chia. The field experiment was conducted in semi-arid India during 2020–2022 with full (I100) and deficit irrigation (I50) and six intercrops. Results demonstrated that chia + fenugreek intercropping in I50 improved the crops’ competitiveness, land equivalent ratio (LER) (1.77), land use efficiency (142.5%), and the IWUE of chia (23.2%). Notably, a chia + radish/spinach system in I50 reduced the seed yield (42.6–45.0%) of chia over I100 monocropping. A chia + fenugreek system in I50 resulted in a higher seed yield (196.2 kg ha−1) than chia monocropping in I100. Further, chia + fenugreek intercropping resulted in higher omega-3 content (56.68%) under I100. Therefore, a chia + fenugreek system under I100 may be suggested over monocropping for better yield and oil quality. However, during water scarcity situations, growers can adopt a chia + fenugreek system under I50 which can give a similar chia equivalent yield and a higher LER and IWUE compared to chia monocropping under I100.

17 October 2023
Verified
Book Chapter
Open access
PDF file
Boraiah KMBoraiah KM
Boraiah KM
BPBasavaraj PS
Basavaraj PS
VKVijaysinha D. Kakade
Vijaysinha D. Kakade
HCHarisha CB
Harisha CB
Pratapsingh KhaptePratapsingh Khapte
Pratapsingh Khapte
HPHimanshu Pathak
Himanshu Pathak
The abiotic stresses, such as drought, waterlogging, heat, cold, and salinity, cause significant crop yield losses associated with extremes of moisture and temperature and ion imbalance. The occurrence of these conditions is being aggravated by climate change, global warming, and industrial pollution. It is crucial to safeguard food security through a constant and sustainable crop production system under multiple abiotic stresses. The cultivation of climate-resilient varieties is one of the best strategies being followed across diverse agroecosystems in the world including India to mitigate the impact of abiotic stress on crop production. Indian agricultural institutional network under the umbrella of the National Agriculture Research System developed a good number of abiotic stress-tolerant varieties across the field and horticultural crops. However, only a few crops varieties introgression with SUB1 gene and salinity tolerant QTLs are being cultivated largely in the areas prone to submergence and salinity stress, respectively. In this book chapter, we have updated the status of abiotic stress tolerance crop varieties (ASTCVs) along with stress-wise trend analysis to disseminate information among farmers, students, scientists, and policymakers involved in abiotic stress management. Finally, we also discussed the strategies to reorient the breeding program to develop climate-smart varieties with multiple biotic and abiotic stress tolerance.

8 April 2025 in PeerJ
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HCHarisha CB
Harisha CB
KBKm Boraiah
Km Boraiah
PBPs Basavaraj
Ps Basavaraj
Hanamant M HalliHanamant M Halli
Hanamant M Halli
RSRam Narayan Singh
Ram Narayan Singh
ESE Senthamil
E Senthamil
Background: Climate influenced weather events, especially during the flowering, grain filling, and maturity stages, can adversely influence crop yield and quality. Therefore, understanding how the phenological behaviour and yield potential of new crops such as chia are influenced by weather and sowing dates is crucial for maximizing crop yield. This study aimed to assess the impact of sowing dates on the flowering behaviour, and yield attributes of chia morphotypes, as well as to identify optimal weather conditions for achieving higher yields. Methods: The study was conducted during 2021–22 and 2022–23 and consisted of fifteen sowing windows from 1st July to 1st February (at 15 days intervals), with two chia morphotypes (white and black seed) arranged in a replicated split-plot design. Phenological events, flowering characters and seed yield traits were recorded regularly. Weather parameters at the experimental location (Maharashtra, India) were recorded. Results: The results revealed that weather conditions such as relative humidity (RH) and rainfall favoured the flowering phenology, yield attributes, and seed yield of chia, whereas maximum temperature (Tmax), bright sunshine hours, and accumulated growing degree days had negative effects. Weather parameters significantly influenced the chia seed yield during the cropping period: RH (positive, R2 = 86.1%), Tmax (negative, R2 = 67.4%), rainfall (positive, R2 = 52.9%), and diurnal temperature range (negative, R2 = 74.9%). Black-seeded chia morphotypes consistently produced higher seed yields (10.8% greater) and better yield-contributing traits compared to white types across various sowing dates. The maximum chia seed yield (811–793.1 kg ha−1) was achieved with sowing dates between August 1st and September 1st in this semi-arid region of India. The performance of chia was good under congenial weather conditions, including relative humidity (∼67–72%), maximum temperature (∼30–31 °C), day length (<12.0 h), rainfall (∼200–350 mm), and accumulated growing degree days (∼1,521–1,891). The present study findings can help identify the best suitable regions for chia cultivation by revealing relationships between the performance of chia morphotypes and weather conditions.

1 December 2022 in Vegetos
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HCHarisha CB
Harisha CB
PBP. S. Basavaraj
P. S. Basavaraj
KBK. M. Boraiah
K. M. Boraiah
JRJagadish Rane
Jagadish Rane
HHHanamant Halli
Hanamant Halli

7 September 2022 in Journal of Environmental Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HCHarisha CB
Harisha CB
KMK.K. Meena
K.K. Meena
KBK.M. Boraiah
K.M. Boraiah
PBP.S. Basavaraj
P.S. Basavaraj