Laryngeal cancer is an important oncological entity in which prognosis depends on the establishment of appropriate preventive and diagnostic measures, especially in high-risk populations. We present a retrospective two-year study (January 2021 to December 2022) with 152 patients diagnosed with laryngeal cancer from a tertiary hospital in Romania. The average age of the patients was 62 years old for both sexes, with a range from 44 to 83 years. The most frequent symptom was dysphonia with or without dyspnea in 142 cases (93.42%), followed by dyspnea alone in nine patients (5.92%) and dysphagia in one case (0.66%). Surgical treatment in this study consisted of partial laryngectomy (CO₂ laser transoral tumor ablation, supraglottic horizontal laryngectomy or hemilaryngectomy), or total laryngectomy. The main treatment was total laryngectomy (63%). For the eight patients with initial organ preservation treatment, the average time of recurrence was about two-and-a-half years. For the four patients who underwent a total circular pharyngo-laryngectomy, the upper digestive tract needed to be rebuilt with a salivary bypass tube or with a tubed myocutaneous flap from the major pectoralis muscle. One strong point is characteristic of the study group in gathering patients with advanced stages of laryngeal carcinoma candidates for salvage surgery and extended reconstruction methods. The development of new prevention protocols is mandatory in Eastern European countries.

Background: Quality of life (QoL) is a critical indicator in assessing the success of oncological treatments for head and neck malignancies, reflecting their impact on physiological functions and psychosocial well-being beyond mere survival. Treatments (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy) pose multiple functional and emotional challenges, and recent advancements underscore the necessity of evaluating post-treatment QoL. Objective: This literature review investigates the impact of oncological treatment on the QoL of patients with malignant head and neck cancers (oral, oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, laryngeal) and identifies factors influencing their QoL index. Methodology: Using a PICO framework, studies from PubMed Central were analyzed, selected based on inclusion (English publications, full text, PROM results) and exclusion criteria. The last research was conducted on 6 April 2025. From 231 identified studies, 49 were included after applying filters (MeSH: “Quality of Life,” “laryngeal cancer,” “oral cavity cancer,” etc.). Data were organized in Excel, and the methodology adhered to PRISMA standards. Results: Treatment Impact: Oncological treatments significantly affect QoL, with acute post-treatment declines in functions such as speech, swallowing, and emotional well-being (anxiety, depression). Partial recovery depends on rehabilitative interventions. Influencing Factors: Treatment type, disease stage, socioeconomic, and demographic contexts influence QoL. De-escalated treatments and prompt rehabilitation improve recovery, while complications like trismus, dysphagia, or persistent hearing issues reduce long-term QoL. Assessment Tools: Standardized PROM questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N35, MDADI, HADS) highlighted QoL variations. Studies from Europe, North America, and Asia indicate regional differences in outcomes. Limitations: Retrospective designs, small sample sizes, and PROM variability limit generalizability. Multicentric studies with extended follow-up are recommended. Conclusions: Oncological treatments for head and neck malignancies have a complex impact on QoL, necessitating personalized and multidisciplinary strategies. De-escalated therapies, early rehabilitation, and continuous monitoring are essential for optimizing functional and psychosocial outcomes. Methodological gaps highlight the need for standardized research.

Objectives: This study aims to determine the efficacy of prophylactic swallowing exercises on swallowing function in patients undergoing total laryngectomy for laryngeal cancer. Methods: The design was a randomized controlled trial set in one tertiary care academic medical center. A total of 92 patients undergoing total laryngectomy for stages III and IV laryngeal cancer performed five targeted swallowing exercises for a period of three months after their surgery, starting two weeks after the surgery. Weekly swallowing therapy sessions were held with the patients in order to encourage adherence and proper technique. The controls received no preventive exercise and were referred for swallowing treatment following the surgery, as well as radiation therapy if necessary. The Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) and the Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer Patients (PSS-H&N) were used to measure swallowing function at the baseline, one week following the surgery, and three, six, nine, and twelve months following the surgery. Results: Right after the surgery, there were no statistically significant variations between the intervention and control groups in the FOIS scores (p value = 0.64), the Eating in Public subscale scores (p value = 1) and Normalcy of Diet subscale scores (p = 0.33) of the PSS-H&N. The scores were significantly better among the intervention patients at months 3, 6, 9, and 12 for all the scores, with p values smaller than 0.000. Conclusions: Although not immediately following the surgery, the patients who engaged in prophylactic swallowing exercises showed improvements in their ability to swallow at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months following their procedure.

Background and Objectives: Patients with advanced head and neck tumors require salvage surgery as a last resort. These extensive surgeries pose the challenge of complex reconstructions. The head and neck surgeon undertaking such complex cases needs to master different flaps. The team managing these patients needs input from various specialists, along with otorhinolaryngologists, plastic surgeons, maxillofacial surgeons, vascular surgeons, experienced radiologists, dedicated pathologists, oncologists and radiation therapists. We focus on the optimum solution between oncologic resections and the future quality of life of patients and overall survival. Each complex case requires a personalized medicine approach. This scoping review aims to assess the efficacy and outcomes of complex reconstructions using various flaps for head and neck tumors, with a focus on free flaps and emerging techniques. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of the literature was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, resulting in the inclusion of 44 articles that met the predefined criteria in the last 10 years. Results: The included studies encompassed diverse patient populations and evaluated various surgical techniques, outcomes, complications, and advancements in head and neck reconstruction. The review identified a variety of flaps utilized in head and neck tumor reconstruction, including free flaps such as the radial forearm, anterolateral thigh, scapular tip, and myocutaneous flaps, among others. The success rates for free flap reconstructions ranged from 85% to 100%, with notable variations attributed to patient selection, tumor characteristics, and surgical expertise. Conclusions: Complications such as flap necrosis, infection, hematoma, and donor site morbidity were documented across studies, highlighting the importance of meticulous surgical planning and postoperative care. Furthermore, the review revealed emerging techniques such as computer-aided design, virtual surgery, stereolithographic models, customized implants, tissue engineering, and allotransplants, offering promising reconstructive armamentarium. Advances in surgical techniques and emerging technologies hold promise for further enhancing reconstructive outcomes, minimizing morbidity, and improving patient quality of life.

Introduction: Oropharyngeal cancer requires a comprehensive evaluation of treatment options, including surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. It is crucial to customize these treatments based on the stage of the tumor and the overall health of the patient, enabling personalized or combined approaches. Transoral surgical techniques have regained popularity due to the advancements and limitations of non-surgical strategies. The potential influence of surgical procedures on patients’ quality of life highlights the need for careful intervention selection; among them, the transoral approach has proven to be especially beneficial for early-stage oropharyngeal neoplasms. Methods: To explore potential treatments for early-stage oropharyngeal malignancies, this study carefully reviews the literature, using information from papers, current research, and global databases. The review protocol commenced on November 2023. A comprehensive search of the PUBMED database was undertaken, employing pertinent terms associated with oropharyngeal, transoral surgery or radiotherapy, robotic surgery, and chemotherapy. Results: Treating early-stage oropharyngeal neoplasms is particularly intriguing due to the multitude of variables influencing treatment decisions, leading to ongoing debates in specialized literature. Regardless of the chosen approach, maintaining a high quality of life is crucial. To assess this, standardized questionnaires from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer were employed, revealing superior outcomes for patients solely undergoing surgical intervention. Additionally, in the realm of specialized literature, cases of HPV-positive oropharyngeal neoplasms are recognized for their heightened radiosensitivity and more favorable long-term prognosis. Conclusions: Surgical intervention and radiotherapy are the main treatment options for oropharyngeal cancer, and they can be used separately or together for maximum effectiveness. Amid ongoing discussions, determining the superior effectiveness between the two options continues to be a matter of debate. This study provides a comprehensive analysis, offering valuable perspectives for future discussions. Neoplasm in the oropharynx can be effectively treated using transoral microsurgery.

Currently, the global incidence of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) continues to increase, with a large proportion of cases being diagnosed at advanced stages. Conventional oncological treatments are often associated with poor quality of life, while the aggressive biological behavior of these tumors results in recurrence in approximately half of treated patients according to current evidence. The need for rapid, targeted diagnosis and personalized treatment has driven research toward the identification of tumor biomarkers with diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive value for treatment response. In this scoping review, we performed a comprehensive literature search to map the available evidence on tumor biomarkers in HNSCC. We identified a wide range of biomarkers, several of which exhibit overlapping roles, and classified them according to their genomic, proteomic, cytokine-related, tumor microenvironment, metabolic, and microbiota-associated characteristics. This scoping review also summarizes the current evidence regarding biomarkers involved in carcinogenesis, treatment response and therapy resistance, while highlighting their current level of clinical applicability. Although only a limited number of biomarkers have currently been implemented in routine clinical practice in head and neck cancers, the studies included in this review identified several promising candidates with the potential to be incorporated into clinical practice following further prospective validation and methodological standardization. Many additional biomarkers are still under investigation, opening new perspectives for future diagnostic and therapeutic targets and supporting the development of personalized multimodal treatment strategies for patients with HNSCC.