Background: Quality of life (QoL) is a critical indicator in assessing the success of oncological treatments for head and neck malignancies, reflecting their impact on physiological functions and psychosocial well-being beyond mere survival. Treatments (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy) pose multiple functional and emotional challenges, and recent advancements underscore the necessity of evaluating post-treatment QoL. Objective: This literature review investigates the impact of oncological treatment on the QoL of patients with malignant head and neck cancers (oral, oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, laryngeal) and identifies factors influencing their QoL index. Methodology: Using a PICO framework, studies from PubMed Central were analyzed, selected based on inclusion (English publications, full text, PROM results) and exclusion criteria. The last research was conducted on 6 April 2025. From 231 identified studies, 49 were included after applying filters (MeSH: “Quality of Life,” “laryngeal cancer,” “oral cavity cancer,” etc.). Data were organized in Excel, and the methodology adhered to PRISMA standards. Results: Treatment Impact: Oncological treatments significantly affect QoL, with acute post-treatment declines in functions such as speech, swallowing, and emotional well-being (anxiety, depression). Partial recovery depends on rehabilitative interventions. Influencing Factors: Treatment type, disease stage, socioeconomic, and demographic contexts influence QoL. De-escalated treatments and prompt rehabilitation improve recovery, while complications like trismus, dysphagia, or persistent hearing issues reduce long-term QoL. Assessment Tools: Standardized PROM questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N35, MDADI, HADS) highlighted QoL variations. Studies from Europe, North America, and Asia indicate regional differences in outcomes. Limitations: Retrospective designs, small sample sizes, and PROM variability limit generalizability. Multicentric studies with extended follow-up are recommended. Conclusions: Oncological treatments for head and neck malignancies have a complex impact on QoL, necessitating personalized and multidisciplinary strategies. De-escalated therapies, early rehabilitation, and continuous monitoring are essential for optimizing functional and psychosocial outcomes. Methodological gaps highlight the need for standardized research.

Laryngeal cancer is an important oncological entity in which prognosis depends on the establishment of appropriate preventive and diagnostic measures, especially in high-risk populations. We present a retrospective two-year study (January 2021 to December 2022) with 152 patients diagnosed with laryngeal cancer from a tertiary hospital in Romania. The average age of the patients was 62 years old for both sexes, with a range from 44 to 83 years. The most frequent symptom was dysphonia with or without dyspnea in 142 cases (93.42%), followed by dyspnea alone in nine patients (5.92%) and dysphagia in one case (0.66%). Surgical treatment in this study consisted of partial laryngectomy (CO₂ laser transoral tumor ablation, supraglottic horizontal laryngectomy or hemilaryngectomy), or total laryngectomy. The main treatment was total laryngectomy (63%). For the eight patients with initial organ preservation treatment, the average time of recurrence was about two-and-a-half years. For the four patients who underwent a total circular pharyngo-laryngectomy, the upper digestive tract needed to be rebuilt with a salivary bypass tube or with a tubed myocutaneous flap from the major pectoralis muscle. One strong point is characteristic of the study group in gathering patients with advanced stages of laryngeal carcinoma candidates for salvage surgery and extended reconstruction methods. The development of new prevention protocols is mandatory in Eastern European countries.

Background and Objectives: Patients with advanced head and neck tumors require salvage surgery as a last resort. These extensive surgeries pose the challenge of complex reconstructions. The head and neck surgeon undertaking such complex cases needs to master different flaps. The team managing these patients needs input from various specialists, along with otorhinolaryngologists, plastic surgeons, maxillofacial surgeons, vascular surgeons, experienced radiologists, dedicated pathologists, oncologists and radiation therapists. We focus on the optimum solution between oncologic resections and the future quality of life of patients and overall survival. Each complex case requires a personalized medicine approach. This scoping review aims to assess the efficacy and outcomes of complex reconstructions using various flaps for head and neck tumors, with a focus on free flaps and emerging techniques. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of the literature was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, resulting in the inclusion of 44 articles that met the predefined criteria in the last 10 years. Results: The included studies encompassed diverse patient populations and evaluated various surgical techniques, outcomes, complications, and advancements in head and neck reconstruction. The review identified a variety of flaps utilized in head and neck tumor reconstruction, including free flaps such as the radial forearm, anterolateral thigh, scapular tip, and myocutaneous flaps, among others. The success rates for free flap reconstructions ranged from 85% to 100%, with notable variations attributed to patient selection, tumor characteristics, and surgical expertise. Conclusions: Complications such as flap necrosis, infection, hematoma, and donor site morbidity were documented across studies, highlighting the importance of meticulous surgical planning and postoperative care. Furthermore, the review revealed emerging techniques such as computer-aided design, virtual surgery, stereolithographic models, customized implants, tissue engineering, and allotransplants, offering promising reconstructive armamentarium. Advances in surgical techniques and emerging technologies hold promise for further enhancing reconstructive outcomes, minimizing morbidity, and improving patient quality of life.

This study aims to establish whether the use of biomaterials, particularly polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), for surgical reconstruction of the esophagus with templates, Montgomery salivary tube, after radical oncology surgery for malignant neoplasia is an optimal choice for patients’ safety and for optimal function preservation and organ rehabilitation. Structural analysis by Raman spectrometry and biomechanical properties with dynamic mechanical analysis are performed for fatigue strength and toughness, essential factors in durability of a prosthesis in the reconstruction practice of the esophagus. Nanocomposites with silicone elastomers and nanoparticles used in implantable devices and in reconstruction surgery present risks of infection and fatigue strength when required to perform a mechanical effort for long periods of time. This report takes into account the effect of silver (Ag) nanoparticles on the fatigue strength using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) matrix, representative for silicon elastomers used in implantable devices. PDMS with 5% (wt) Ag nanoparticles of 100–150 nm during mechanical fatigue testing at shear strength loses elasticity properties after 400 loading-unloading cycles and up to 15% shear strain. The fatigue strength, toughness, maximum shear strength, as well as clinical properties are key issues in designing Montgomery salivary tube and derivates with appropriate biomechanical behavior for each patient. Prosthesis design needs to indulge both clinical outcomes as well as design methods and research in the field of biomaterials.

Introduction: Oropharyngeal cancer requires a comprehensive evaluation of treatment options, including surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. It is crucial to customize these treatments based on the stage of the tumor and the overall health of the patient, enabling personalized or combined approaches. Transoral surgical techniques have regained popularity due to the advancements and limitations of non-surgical strategies. The potential influence of surgical procedures on patients’ quality of life highlights the need for careful intervention selection; among them, the transoral approach has proven to be especially beneficial for early-stage oropharyngeal neoplasms. Methods: To explore potential treatments for early-stage oropharyngeal malignancies, this study carefully reviews the literature, using information from papers, current research, and global databases. The review protocol commenced on November 2023. A comprehensive search of the PUBMED database was undertaken, employing pertinent terms associated with oropharyngeal, transoral surgery or radiotherapy, robotic surgery, and chemotherapy. Results: Treating early-stage oropharyngeal neoplasms is particularly intriguing due to the multitude of variables influencing treatment decisions, leading to ongoing debates in specialized literature. Regardless of the chosen approach, maintaining a high quality of life is crucial. To assess this, standardized questionnaires from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer were employed, revealing superior outcomes for patients solely undergoing surgical intervention. Additionally, in the realm of specialized literature, cases of HPV-positive oropharyngeal neoplasms are recognized for their heightened radiosensitivity and more favorable long-term prognosis. Conclusions: Surgical intervention and radiotherapy are the main treatment options for oropharyngeal cancer, and they can be used separately or together for maximum effectiveness. Amid ongoing discussions, determining the superior effectiveness between the two options continues to be a matter of debate. This study provides a comprehensive analysis, offering valuable perspectives for future discussions. Neoplasm in the oropharynx can be effectively treated using transoral microsurgery.

COVID-19 signs and symptoms varied among patients, with the most common being fever, fatigue, sore throat, cough, anorexia, and shortness of breath. (1) Background: This study aimed to assess effort, dyspnea, and cooperation scores in patients with mild and moderate post-COVID-19 forms, both at baseline and after completing a structured physical recovery program. (2) Methods: Our study included 160 post-COVID-19 patients who had experienced mild or moderate disease. (3) Results: Effort and dyspnea scores were significantly lower (p < 0.01), while cooperation scores were significantly higher after the rehabilitation program. Both men and women demonstrated significant increases in cooperation scores after recovery. Additionally, both groups showed statistically significant reductions in effort and dyspnea scores (p < 0.001). Among patients aged under and over 60 years, effort and dyspnea scores decreased after rehabilitation, and cooperation scores increased significantly (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between genders in any of the three scores. Similarly, no significant differences by age were found in cooperation or dyspnea scores. A significant negative correlation was observed between cooperation and effort scores: patients with higher cooperation scores tended to report lower effort scores, and vice versa (p < 0.001, R = −0.571). (4) Conclusions: The improved cooperation demonstrated by patients during the physical recovery program was significantly associated with reductions in perceived effort and dyspnea, indicating a positive impact on post-COVID-19 rehabilitation outcomes.