The contraceptive use profile is poorly understood in some Gulf Arabian countries, including Saudi Arabia. The present study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practices related to contraceptive use among women of childbearing age in Jazan city, Saudi Arabia. An observational, analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among a random sample of 450 women in Jazan city. The data were obtained through personal interviews using a questionnaire that included questions on women’s level of knowledge about contraception methods, their attitudes towards contraception methods, and their practices. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics techniques using the SPSS program. The prevalence of ever having used contraceptives was significantly different according to age group, job status, children ever born, and the number of pregnancies (p < 0.05 for all). On the other hand, the prevalence of desire to use the contraceptives in the future was high, at 70.9%, with a 95% CI [66.5–74.9]. It differed significantly according to age group and job status (p < 0.05 for both). The most familiar and usable types of contraceptives were pills (36.3%) and intrauterine devices (24.4%). When asked their reasons for using contraceptives, 53.8% of participants cited child spacing and 21.8% improving child health. Logistic regression revealed that the use of contraception among women was more associated with the 20–34 age group [COR = 7.7, 95% CI = 4.4–13.5, p < 0.001] than the 15–24 age group. Having more than one pregnancy and having more than one child were also associated with increased use of contraceptive methods (p < 0.001 for both). These results indicate there is a high level of awareness about contraceptives, a positive attitude toward them, and good practices for the use of them among Saudi women in Jazan. More efforts are needed to improve women’s awareness for better utilization of the available services.

Background: Hepatitis presents a major health and economic challenge in Saudi Arabia, necessitating insight into its epidemiology, risk factors, and control measures. This review aims to synthesize current evidence on the epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention strategies for viral hepatitis in Saudi Arabia. It evaluates the effectiveness of existing interventions and proposes data-driven approaches to advance national hepatitis elimination goals. Methods: This study reviewed data from 2016 to 2024, sourced from PubMed, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, and ScienceDirect, focusing on hepatitis epidemiology and prevention in Saudi Arabia. Studies relevant to Saudi-specific trends and prevention strategies were included. Results: Saudi Arabia has achieved significant reductions in viral hepatitis prevalence, notably HBV (1.3%) due to universal infant vaccination (98% coverage), and HCV (0.124%) through the Saudi National Hepatitis Program (SNHP), which provides free DAAs (95% cure rate) and has screened 5 million people. However, challenges persist: HAV susceptibility is rising in adults (seroprevalence 33.1%), HDV affects 7.7% of HBV patients, and key risk factors include socioeconomic disparities (higher HAV/HEV in rural/low-income areas), intravenous drug use (30–50% of HCV cases), unsafe medical/cultural practices (e.g., Hijama), and limited healthcare access for migrants/rural populations. While interventions like water sanitation initiatives (58% HAV decline) and prenatal screening are effective, advancing elimination goals requires addressing gaps in HDV/HEV surveillance, outdated seroprevalence data, equitable treatment access (35% lower in rural areas), stigma reduction, and targeted strategies for high-risk groups to meet WHO 2030 targets. Conclusions: Saudi Arabia has made significant progress in hepatitis control through vaccination and public health efforts, but challenges persist. Strengthening healthcare systems, improving community engagement, and ensuring equitable access are key to sustaining elimination efforts.

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the potential association between use of WhatsApp in healthcare settings for work-related purposes and depression, stress, and anxiety levels among a sample of healthcare workers in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of healthcare employees working in different hospitals in Jazan. The data was collected via a semi-structured, self-administered questionnaire with three components that measured the demographics of the sample; the presence of depression, anxiety, and stress; and their use of WhatsApp in the work environment. A multivariate regression analysis was carried out to estimate the statistical likelihood of depression, anxiety, and stress as a result of using WhatsApp and how these factors affected occupational and social relationships. Results: A total of 294 healthcare workers participated in the current study. The median age of the participants was 32 years, and the gender distribution was almost even. Over 90% of the participants stated that they were members of work-related WhatsApp groups, and nearly 70% agreed that use of WhatsApp in work-related settings could be stressful. Among the recruited sample, 48.6% exhibited abnormal levels of depression, 55.8% had abnormal levels of anxiety, and 63% showed abnormal levels of stress. The findings of the regression analysis (P values < 0.05) indicated that the likelihood of these participants suffering with depression, anxiety, and stress was high, with the participants themselves agreeing that using WhatsApp in work settings could be stressful and affect their relationships with colleagues, friends, and family members. Conclusion: The findings suggests the presence of a potential association between use of WhatsApp for work-related purposes and levels of depression, anxiety, and stress, especially among those who perceive its use as a stressor and influencer on occupational and social relationships.

Dysmenorrhea, or painful menstruation, is one of the most prevalent conditions among adolescents and young females globally, significantly affecting academic performance, quality of life, and social interactions. Despite its high prevalence, dysmenorrhea has been rarely investigated in Saudi Arabia, resulting in a scarcity of national data. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence, severity, and determinants of dysmenorrhea among females in Saudi Arabia. This cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study included 1026 participants recruited from various regions of Saudi Arabia using a convenience sampling technique. Data collection was conducted using a validated, self-administered online questionnaire. Descriptive and inferential statistics were utilized to evaluate the prevalence, severity, and associated symptoms of dysmenorrhea. Additionally, multiple logistic regression was employed to identify the determinants of dysmenorrhea within the sample. The analysis was performed using R software. The prevalence of dysmenorrhea among the sample was 87%, with a mean pain score of 6 ± 2.2. Common menstrual cycle-associated symptoms included mood swings (79%), abdominal bloating (60%), diarrhea (32%), and constipation (26%). Factors associated with an increased risk of dysmenorrhea included Saudi nationality (OR = 1.96, p = 0.032), employment (OR = 1.75, p = 0.034), and a history of gynecological surgeries (OR = 1.81, p = 0.045). Conversely, multiparity was associated with a reduced risk of dysmenorrhea (OR = 0.36, p = 0.046). Dysmenorrhea is highly prevalent among Saudi women and is accompanied by significant menstrual symptoms that adversely affect quality of life. Understanding its determinants and associated symptoms is essential for improving management strategies and mitigating its impact on women’s lives.

Patient satisfaction has become an influential corner in the health services process. Web-based appointment scheduling has been expanded for its benefits and has become a popular research topic. This study’s objectives were to assess patients’ satisfaction and perception with the new Web-Based Medical Appointment System “Mawid” program and determine the associated factors at the Primary Health Care Centers level in Jazan Southwest Saudi Arabia. An observational cross-sectional survey was implemented among 424 adults aged 18 years and above, attending a randomly selected 12 primary health care centers in the Jizan region, Southwest Saudi Arabia. The study instrument included socio-demographic background information, perception, and level of satisfaction with the new appointment system. Responses were analyzed using the SPSS program by applying descriptive and inferential statistical techniques. The overall level of satisfaction was very high at 94.3% with 95% C.I. (91.7-96.1). A large proportion of study participants were highly satisfied with the new Web-Based Medical appointment System “Mawid” as nine satisfaction items scored a level of satisfaction of 90% and above. Regarding the perception, 89.1% of the participants agreed that the appointment booking system regulates the number of patients, while 87.7% of participants considered that the appointment system reduces clinic crowding. More than half of respondents (61.8%) agreed that the community culture might limit the scheduling system’s use. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that male patients were more likely to have a higher level of satisfaction as compared with female (COR= 2.95, 95% C.I.:1.15-7.60, p = 0.025) and (AOR= 3.12, 95% C.I:1.14-8.52, p = 0.026), respectively. In conclusion, this study revealed a high level of satisfaction among study the participants with the new Web-Based Medical Appointment System “Mawid.” The system effectively improved patients’ satisfaction with registration and reduced waiting times. Patients' satisfaction can be assessed regularly and used systematically as a quality and benchmarking instrument in primary health care.

Background and Objectives: Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS) has become a major health problem among university students as a result of extensive electronic device use, but there is limited in-depth risk factor analysis by academic disciplines. The purpose of this study was to determine CVS prevalence, identify risk-associated factors, and investigate discipline-specific differences among university students. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Jazan University among 427 students of six academic disciplines between 2023 and 2024. Questionnaires validated by collecting demographics, electronic device usage patterns, eye care practices, and CVS symptoms were used to assess the data. Statistical analyses involved chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression with significance at p < 0.05. Results: Prevalence of CVS was at epidemic proportions at 89.7% (95% CI: 86.8–92.6%), which was much higher than global averages. Considerable inter-disciplinary heterogeneity occurred, from 95.3% in Computer Science to 75.4% in Arts and Humanities students. A strong dose–response gradient was found for duration of device use: 3–4 h (OR = 4.13, 95% CI: 1.13–5.57), 5–6 h (OR = 5.31, 95% CI: 1.46–9.86), and ≥7 h per day (OR = 6.25, 95% CI: 1.74–8.01) versus 1–2 h use. Students >24 years old demonstrated a very high risk (OR = 9.73, 95% CI: 1.53–19.65). Headaches were the most common symptom (68.0%), and adoption of protective measures was low. Conclusions: This work demonstrates epidemic-level prevalence of CVS with unequivocal dose–response relationships and discipline-specific risk patterns, offering evidence-based targets for immediate campus-wide interventions and identifying a vital post-pandemic public health challenge meriting immediate attention.