Background: Hypertension is a public health concern for many countries. The World Health Organization has established a global objective to reduce the prevalence of non-communicable diseases, including hypertension, which is associated with cardiovascular disease. Remote nursing interventions can potentially lessen the burden on the healthcare system and promote a healthier population. This systematic review aims to synthesize available evidence on the effectiveness of nursing-led telehealth interventions in reducing blood pressure in hypertensive patients. Methods: A systematic review was conducted. The search was performed from May to June 2021, in the databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, and ProQuest within 2010–2021 in English, Spanish and Portuguese. Randomized controlled trials and Quasi-experimental studies were considered. This systematic review followed the criteria of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, with the support of the PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. For critical analysis, the tools of the Joanna Briggs Institute were used. Results: Of the 942 articles found, six controlled clinical trials and one quasi-experimental study were selected. Different nurse-led interventions (telehealth devices, remote video consultation, calls and email alerts) have demonstrated a significant decrease in blood pressure (especially systolic blood pressure) in the intervention groups. Nurse-led interventions also effect hypertension awareness, self-efficacy, and self-control. Positive effects on lowering cholesterol, consumption of fruits and vegetables, physical activity and adherence to medication were also described. Conclusion: Nurse-led interventions delivered remotely have a positive effect in lowering the blood pressure of patients with hypertension. Further research is required to support strategies that will deliver the best continuous, quality, and cost-effective nursing care.

Aim: To analyze personal and organizational strategies described in the literature for dealing with the second victim phenomenon among healthcare providers.Background: The second victim phenomenon involves many associated signs and symptoms, which can be physical, psychological, emotional, or behavioral. Personal and organizational strategies have been developed to deal with this phenomenon.Materials and methods: A systematic review was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, Science Direct, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases, searching for evidence published between 2010 and 2019 in Spanish, English, German, and Portuguese.Results: Seven hundred and eighty‐three articles were identified. After eliminating duplicates, applying inclusion and exclusion criteria and critical analysis tools of the Joanna Briggs Institute, 16 research articles were included: 10 quantitative studies (design: descriptive, correlational, systematic, or integrative review) and six qualitative studies (descriptive, systematic review). There are several different personal and organizational strategies for dealing with the second victim phenomenon. Among these, peer support and learning from adverse events are highly valued. In personal strategies stands out the internal analysis of the adverse event that the professional performs to deal with the generated negative feelings. In organizational strategies, the most valued are second victim support programs with rapid response teams and made up of peers.Conclusions: The main organizational coping strategies for tackling this phenomenon are online programs in countries such as the United States, Spain, and other European countries. Formal evaluation of these programs and research is required in Latin America.Implications for nursing and health policies: Adequately coping with the second victim phenomenon allows health professionals and organizations to learn from adverse events. Furthermore, by supporting health professionals who suffer from the second victim phenomenon, the organization takes care of its most valuable resource, its human capital. This contributes toward building a culture of healthcare quality in organizations, which will reduce adverse events in the future.

Background/Objectives: Chronic kidney disease is associated with increased intestinal barrier permeability, leading to heightened inflammation and oxidative stress. These changes contribute to complications such as cardiovascular disease, anemia, altered mineral metabolism, and CKD progression. Interventions using prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics may mitigate dysbiosis and improve intestinal barrier function, Under this premise, the objective of this network meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in reducing uremic toxins produced by the gut microbiota in CKD patients. Methods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was performed in the following databases: Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and PubMed published between 2019 and 2023. The analysis focused on the use of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics in CKD patients at stages 3 to 5, as per KDIGO guidelines, and their association with reductions in uremic toxins such as Indoxyl Sulfate, p-Cresyl Sulfate, urea, and creatinine. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2), with evaluations conducted independently by two reviewers, and a third consulted for disagreements. The study follows the PRISMA statement. Results: The studies included 331 patients, primarily male, across CKD stages 3a to 5. The interventions positively impacted the gut microbiota composition, leading to reductions in free and total p-Cresyl Sulfate (SUCRA: 72.6% and 66.2, respectively) and indoxyl sulfate (SUCRA: 88.5% and 83.1%). Conclusions: The findings suggest that modulating the gut microbiota through these interventions can effectively reduce specific uremic toxins. However, further trials are necessary to better understand microbiota modulation and its impact on intestinal bacterial composition (PROSPERO number: CRD42023438901).

Background: Health professionals can be ‘second victims’ of adverse patient events. Second victimhood involves a series of physical and psychological signs and symptoms of varying severity and is most prevalent among nurses and women and in intensive care units (ICUs). Previous research has described personal and organizational coping strategies.Aim: The objective of this research is to determine the prevalence of second victimhood, focusing on psychological distress, among Chilean adult intensive care nurses and its relationship with the support provided by their organizations.Study Design: A descriptive, correlational and cross‐sectional study was conducted in seven intensive care units of Chilean hospitals.Results: Of a sample of 326 nurses, 90.18% reported having been involved in an adverse event and 67% reported psychological distress resulting from the adverse event. Embarrassment was the most prevalent psychological symptom (69%). Only 2.8% reported that their organization had an action plan for professionals in the event of a serious adverse event. Participants who had spent longer working in an ICU reported more support from their organization around adverse events.Conclusion: Two‐thirds of Chilean adult intensive care unit nurses report psychological stress following an adverse event. These results should be assessed internationally because second victims have major implications for the well‐being of health professionals and, therefore, for retention and the quality of care.Relevance to Clinical Practice: Critical care leaders must actively promote a safe environment for learning from adverse events, and hospitals must establish a culture of quality that includes support programmes for second victims.