MD Mijanur Rahman

Mr. MD Mijanur Rahman


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
AMAbul Hasnat Milton
Abul Hasnat Milton
MRMD Mijanur Rahman
MD Mijanur Rahman
SHSumaira Hussain
Sumaira Hussain
CJCharulata Jindal
Charulata Jindal
SCSushmita Choudhury
Sushmita Choudhury
Jimmy Thomas EfirdJimmy Thomas Efird
Jimmy Thomas Efird
The Rohingya people are one of the most ill-treated and persecuted refugee groups in the world, having lived in a realm of statelessness for over six generations, and who are still doing so. In recent years, more than 500,000 Rohingyas fled from Myanmar (Burma) to neighboring countries. This article addresses the Rohingya refugee crisis in Bangladesh, with special emphasis on the living conditions of this vulnerable population. We reviewed several documents on Rohingya refugees, visited a registered refugee camp (Teknaf), collected case reports, and conducted a series of meetings with stakeholders in the Cox’s Bazar district of Bangladesh. A total of 33,131 registered Rohingya refugees are living in two registered camps in Cox’s Bazar, and up to 80,000 additional refugees are housed in nearby makeshift camps. Overall, the living conditions of Rohingya refugees inside the overcrowded camps remain dismal. Mental health is poor, proper hygiene conditions are lacking, malnutrition is endemic, and physical/sexual abuse is high. A concerted diplomatic effort involving Bangladesh and Myanmar, and international mediators such as the Organization of Islamic Countries and the United Nations, is urgently required to effectively address this complex situation.

AMAbul Hasnat Milton
Abul Hasnat Milton
SHSumaira Hussain
Sumaira Hussain
SAShahnaz Akter
Shahnaz Akter
MRMD Mijanur Rahman
MD Mijanur Rahman
TMTAFZILA AKTER MOULY
TAFZILA AKTER MOULY
KMKane Mitchell
Kane Mitchell
Exposure to arsenic has a number of known detrimental health effects but impact on pregnancy outcomes is not as widely recognized. This narrative review examines existing epidemiological evidence investigating the association between arsenic exposure via drinking water and adverse pregnancy outcomes. We reviewed published epidemiological studies from around the world on impact of chronic arsenic exposure on spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, neonatal death, post neonatal death, low birth weight and preterm baby. Plausible mechanisms of arsenic toxicity causing adverse pregnancy outcomes were also determined through literature review. There is convincing evidence to support the association between high inorganic arsenic exposure (>50 ppb) and spontaneous abortion, stillbirth and low birth weight. Limitations of certain studies include study design, small sample size, recall constraints and exposure assessment. There needs to be further research investigating the dose metered impact of arsenic exposure on pregnancy outcomes. Further research on impact of low–moderate arsenic concentration exposure on pregnancy outcomes will allow for appropriate public health policy recommendations.



1 March 2019 in Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMD Mijanur Rahman
MD Mijanur Rahman
JEJimmy T. Efird
Jimmy T. Efird
JBJulie E. Byles
Julie E. Byles

12 August 2022 in International Journal of Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MRMD Mijanur Rahman
MD Mijanur Rahman
CJCarol Jagger
Carol Jagger
LLLucy Leigh
Lucy Leigh
EHElizabeth Holliday
Elizabeth Holliday
EPEmily Princehorn
Emily Princehorn
JBJulie Byles
Julie Byles
Objectives: Low education and unhealthy lifestyle factors such as obesity, smoking, and no exercise are modifiable risk factors for disability and premature mortality. We aimed to estimate the individual and joint impact of these factors on disability-free life expectancy (DFLE) and total life expectancy (TLE).Methods: Data (n = 22,304) were from two birth cohorts (1921–26 and 1946–51) of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health and linked National Death Index between 1996 and 2016. Discrete-time multi-state Markov models were used to assess the impact on DFLE and TLE.Results: Compared to the most favourable combination of education and lifestyle factors, the least favourable combination (low education, obesity, current/past smoker, and no exercise) was associated with a loss of 5.0 years TLE, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 3.2–6.8 and 6.4 years DFLE (95%CI: 4.8–7.8) at age 70 in the 1921–26 cohort. Corresponding losses in the 1946–51 cohort almost doubled (TLE: 11.0 years and DFLE: 13.0 years).Conclusion: Individual or co-ocurrance of lifestyle risk factors were associated with a significant loss of DFLE, with a greater loss in low-educated women and those in the 1946–51 cohort.