Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet #Preprint #PeerReviewMe: Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint. Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn. Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period. Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author). Background: Telemedicine is increasingly evaluated for rehabilitation of stroke survivors. However, little is known about the utility of telerehabilitation in stroke survivors. Objective: To summarize the evidence on the utility of telerehabilitation in stroke survivors. Methods: Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected from Medline, Cochrane Central and Web of Science databases. Continuous data on the outcomes were analyzed using the RevMan software as standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) in a fixed effect meta-analysis model. Results: Fifteen studies, providing data on 1,339 stroke survivors were eligible for inclusion. The combined effect estimate showed that telerehabilitation is as good as usual care as Barthel index (SMD = -0.05, 95% CI [-0.18, 0.08]), Berg Balance Scale (SMD = -0.04, 95% CI [-0.34, 0.26]), Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity (SMD = 0.50, 95% CI [-0.09, 1.09]) and Stroke Impact Scale [mobility] (SMD = 0.18, 95% CI [-0.13, 0.48]) scores were statistically similar in both groups. Further, quality of life (of the stroke survivor), caregiver strain index and patients' satisfaction with care scores were also similar for both the groups. One study showed that the cost of telerehabilitation was lower than usual care by $654. Conclusions: Telerehabilitation can be a suitable alternative to usual rehabilitation care in post-stroke patients, especially in remote or underserved areas.