Giuseppe Fanelli

Dr. Giuseppe Fanelli

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 January 2025 in Translational Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GFGiuseppe Fanelli
Giuseppe Fanelli
EREmanuel Raschi
Emanuel Raschi
GHGaye Hafez
Gaye Hafez
SMSilke Matura
Silke Matura
CSCarmen Schiweck
Carmen Schiweck
Carlotta LunghiCarlotta Lunghi
Carlotta Lunghi
This state-of-the-art review explores the relationship between depression and diabetes, highlighting the two-way influences that make treatment challenging and worsen the outcomes of both conditions. Depression and diabetes often co-occur and share genetic, lifestyle, and psychosocial risk factors. Lifestyle elements such as diet, physical activity, and sleep patterns play a role on the development and management of both conditions, highlighting the need for integrated treatment strategies. The evidence suggests that traditional management strategies focusing on either condition in isolation fall short of addressing the intertwined nature of diabetes and depression. Instead, integrated care models encompassing psychological support and medical management are recommended to improve treatment efficacy and patient adherence. Such models require collaboration across multiple healthcare disciplines, including endocrinology, psychiatry, and primary care, to offer a holistic approach to patient care. This review also identifies significant patient-related barriers to effective management, such as stigma, psychological resistance, and health literacy, which need to be addressed through patient-centered education and support systems. Future directions for research include longitudinal studies in diverse populations to further elucidate causal relationships and the exploration of novel therapeutic targets, as well as the effectiveness of healthcare models aimed at preventing the onset of one condition in individuals diagnosed with the other.

14 February 2022 in Translational Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GFGiuseppe Fanelli
Giuseppe Fanelli
BFBarbara Franke
Barbara Franke
WWWard De Witte
Ward De Witte
IRI. Hyun Ruisch
I. Hyun Ruisch
JHJan Haavik
Jan Haavik
JBJanita Bralten
Janita Bralten
The prevalence of somatic insulinopathies, like metabolic syndrome (MetS), obesity, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), is higher in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Dysregulation of insulin signalling has been implicated in these neuropsychiatric disorders, and shared genetic factors might partly underlie this observed multimorbidity. We investigated the genetic overlap between AD, ASD, and OCD with MetS, obesity, and T2DM by estimating pairwise global genetic correlations using the summary statistics of the largest available genome-wide association studies for these phenotypes. Having tested these hypotheses, other potential brain “insulinopathies” were also explored by estimating the genetic relationship of six additional neuropsychiatric disorders with nine insulin-related diseases/traits. Stratified covariance analyses were then performed to investigate the contribution of insulin-related gene sets. Significant negative genetic correlations were found between OCD and MetS (rg = −0.315, p = 3.9 × 10−8), OCD and obesity (rg = −0.379, p = 3.4 × 10−5), and OCD and T2DM (rg = −0.172, p = 3 × 10−4). Significant genetic correlations with insulin-related phenotypes were also found for anorexia nervosa (AN), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), major depressive disorder, and schizophrenia (p < 6.17 × 10−4). Stratified analyses showed negative genetic covariances between AD, ASD, OCD, ADHD, AN, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and somatic insulinopathies through gene sets related to insulin signalling and insulin receptor recycling, and positive genetic covariances between AN and T2DM, as well as ADHD and MetS through gene sets related to insulin processing/secretion (p < 2.06 × 10−4). Overall, our findings suggest the existence of two clusters of neuropsychiatric disorders, in which the genetics of insulin-related diseases/traits may exert divergent pleiotropic effects. These results represent a starting point for a new research line on “insulinopathies” of the brain.

28 October 2022 in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GFGiuseppe Fanelli
Giuseppe Fanelli
NMNina Roth Mota
Nina Roth Mota
Jordi Salas-SalvadóJordi Salas-Salvadó
Jordi Salas-Salvadó
MBMònica Bulló
Mònica Bulló
FFFernando Fernandez-Aranda
Fernando Fernandez-Aranda
JBJanita Bralten
Janita Bralten
Clinical and genomic studies have shown an overlap between neuropsychiatric disorders and insulin resistance (IR)-related somatic conditions, including obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. Impaired cognition is often observed among neuropsychiatric disorders, where multiple cognitive domains may be affected. In this review, we aimed to summarise previous evidence on the relationship between IR-related diseases/traits and cognitive performance in the large UK Biobank study cohort. Electronic searches were conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until April 2022. Eighteen articles met the inclusion criteria and were qualitatively reviewed. Overall, there is substantial evidence for an association between IR-related cardio-metabolic diseases/traits and worse performance on various cognitive domains, which is largely independent of possible confoundings. The most consistent findings referred to IR-related associations with poorer verbal and numerical reasoning ability, as well as slower processing speed. The observed associations might be mediated by alterations in immune-inflammation, brain integrity/connectivity, and/or comorbid somatic or psychiatric diseases/traits. Our findings provide impetus for further research into the underlying neurobiology and possible new therapeutic targets.

1 January 2019 in Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GFGiuseppe Fanelli
Giuseppe Fanelli
ASAlessandro Serretti
Alessandro Serretti

9 May 2022 in European Neuropsychopharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GFGiuseppe Fanelli
Giuseppe Fanelli
ASAlessandro Serretti
Alessandro Serretti

6 February 2024 in International Clinical Psychopharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GBGianluca Borgiani
Gianluca Borgiani
CPChiara Possidente
Chiara Possidente
CFChiara Fabbri
Chiara Fabbri
VOVincenzo Oliva
Vincenzo Oliva
MBMirjam Bloemendaal
Mirjam Bloemendaal
GFGiuseppe Fanelli
Giuseppe Fanelli
This review synthesizes the evidence on associations between antidepressant use and gut microbiota composition and function, exploring the microbiota’s possible role in modulating antidepressant treatment outcomes. Antidepressants exert an influence on measures of gut microbial diversity. The most consistently reported differences were in β-diversity between those exposed to antidepressants and those not exposed, with longitudinal studies supporting a potential causal association. Compositional alterations in antidepressant users include an increase in the Bacteroidetes phylum, Christensenellaceae family, and Bacteroides and Clostridium genera, while a decrease was found in the Firmicutes phylum, Ruminococcaceae family, and Ruminococcus genus. In addition, antidepressants attenuate gut microbial differences between depressed and healthy individuals, modulate microbial serotonin transport, and influence microbiota’s metabolic functions. These include lyxose degradation, peptidoglycan maturation, membrane transport, and methylerythritol phosphate pathways, alongside gamma-aminobutyric acid metabolism. Importantly, baseline increased α-diversity and abundance of the Roseburia and Faecalibacterium genera, in the Firmicutes phylum, are associated with antidepressant response, emerging as promising biomarkers. This review highlights the potential for gut microbiota as a predictor of treatment response and emphasizes the need for further research to elucidate the mechanisms underlying antidepressant-microbiota interactions. More homogeneous studies and standardized techniques are required to confirm these initial findings.