Jasper Lewis

Dr. Jasper Lewis

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 June 2013 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJasper Lewis
Jasper Lewis
EWEllsworth J. Welton
Ellsworth J. Welton
AMAndrea M. Molod
Andrea M. Molod
EJEverette Joseph
Everette Joseph
Continuous lidar observations of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) depth have been made at the Micropulse Lidar Network (MPLNET) site in Greenbelt, Maryland, since April 2001. However, because of issues with the operational PBL depth algorithm, the data are not reliable for determining seasonal and diurnal trends. Therefore, an improved PBL depth algorithm has been developed which uses a combination of the wavelet technique and image processing. The new algorithm is less susceptible to contamination by clouds and residual layers and, in general, produces lower PBL depths. A 2010 comparison shows the operational algorithm overestimates the daily mean PBL depth when compared to the improved algorithm (1.85 and 1.07 km, respectively). The improved MPLNET PBL depths are validated using radiosonde comparisons, which suggests the algorithm performs well to determine the depth of a fully developed PBL. A comparison with the Goddard Earth Observing System version 5 (GEOS‐5) model suggests that the model may underestimate the maximum daytime PBL depth by ∼410 m during the spring and summer. The best agreement between MPLNET and GEOS‐5 occurred during the fall and they differed the most in the winter.

1 October 2016 in Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJasper Lewis
Jasper Lewis
JCJames Campbell
James Campbell
EWEllsworth J. Welton
Ellsworth J. Welton
SSSebastian A. Stewart
Sebastian A. Stewart
PHPhillip C. Haftings
Phillip C. Haftings
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Micro Pulse Lidar Network, version 3, cloud detection algorithm is described and differences relative to the previous version are highlighted. Clouds are identified from normalized level 1 signal profiles using two complementary methods. The first method considers vertical signal derivatives for detecting low-level clouds. The second method, which detects high-level clouds like cirrus, is based on signal uncertainties necessitated by the relatively low signal-to-noise ratio exhibited in the upper troposphere by eye-safe network instruments, especially during daytime. Furthermore, a multitemporal averaging scheme is used to improve cloud detection under conditions of a weak signal-to-noise ratio. Diurnal and seasonal cycles of cloud occurrence frequency based on one year of measurements at the Goddard Space Flight Center (Greenbelt, Maryland) site are compared for the new and previous versions. The largest differences, and perceived improvement, in detection occurs for high clouds (above 5 km, above MSL), which increase in occurrence by over 5%. There is also an increase in the detection of multilayered cloud profiles from 9% to 19%. Macrophysical properties and estimates of cloud optical depth are presented for a transparent cirrus dataset. However, the limit to which the cirrus cloud optical depth could be reliably estimated occurs between 0.5 and 0.8. A comparison using collocated CALIPSO measurements at the Goddard Space Flight Center and Singapore Micro Pulse Lidar Network (MPLNET) sites indicates improvements in cloud occurrence frequencies and layer heights.

1 January 2015 in Atmospheric Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DCD. Allen Chu
D. Allen Chu
RFRichard Ferrare
Richard Ferrare
JSJames Szykman
James Szykman
JLJasper Lewis
Jasper Lewis
ASAmy Scarino
Amy Scarino
JCJames Crawford
James Crawford

18 December 2020 in Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJasper Lewis
Jasper Lewis
JCJames Campbell
James Campbell
SSSebastian A. Stewart
Sebastian A. Stewart
ITIvy Tan
Ivy Tan
EWEllsworth J Welton
Ellsworth J Welton
Simone LolliSimone Lolli
Simone Lolli
A method to distinguish cloud thermodynamic phase from polarized Micro Pulse Lidar (MPL) measurements is described. The method employs a simple enumerative approach to classify cloud layers as either liquid water, ice water, or mixed-phase clouds based on the linear volume depolarization ratio and cloud top temperatures derived from Goddard Earth Observing System, version 5 (GEOS-5), assimilated data. Two years of cloud retrievals from the Micro Pulse Lidar Network (MPLNET) site in Greenbelt, MD, are used to evaluate the performance of the algorithm. The fraction of supercooled liquid water in the mixed-phase temperature regime (−37–0 ∘C) calculated using MPLNET data is compared to similar calculations made using the spaceborne Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) instrument onboard the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) satellite, with reasonable consistency.

11 July 2018 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Simone LolliSimone Lolli
Simone Lolli
Leo Pio D'AdderioLeo Pio D'Adderio
Leo Pio D'Adderio
JCJames Campbell
James Campbell
Michaël SicardMichaël Sicard
Michaël Sicard
EWEllsworth J Welton
Ellsworth J Welton
FMFabio Madonna
Fabio Madonna
In this paper, we illustrate a new, simple and complementary ground-based methodology to retrieve the vertically resolved atmospheric precipitation intensity through a synergy between measurements from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Micropulse Lidar network (MPLNET), an analytical model solution and ground-based disdrometer measurements. The presented results are obtained at two mid-latitude MPLNET permanent observational sites, located respectively at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, USA, and at the Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain. The methodology is suitable to be applied to existing and/or future lidar/ceilometer networks with the main objective of either providing near real-time (3 h latency) rainfall intensity measurements and/or to validate satellite missions, especially for critical light precipitation (<3 mm h−1).

24 December 2019 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Simone LolliSimone Lolli
Simone Lolli
Gemine VivoneGemine Vivone
Gemine Vivone
JLJasper Lewis
Jasper Lewis
Michaël SicardMichaël Sicard
Michaël Sicard
EWEllsworth J Welton
Ellsworth J Welton
GPGelsomina Pappalardo
Gelsomina Pappalardo
Precipitation modifies atmospheric column thermodynamics through the process of evaporation and serves as a proxy for latent heat modulation. For this reason, a correct precipitation parameterization (especially for low-intensity precipitation) within global scale models is crucial. In addition to improving our modeling of the hydrological cycle, this will reduce the associated uncertainty of global climate models in correctly forecasting future scenarios, and will enable the application of mitigation strategies. In this manuscript we present a proof of concept algorithm to automatically detect precipitation from lidar measurements obtained from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Micropulse lidar network (MPLNET). The algorithm, once tested and validated against other remote sensing instruments, will be operationally implemented into the network to deliver a near real time (latency <1.5 h) rain masking variable that will be publicly available on MPLNET website as part of the new Version 3 data products. The methodology, based on an image processing technique, detects only light precipitation events (defined by intensity and duration) such as light rain, drizzle, and virga. During heavy rain events, the lidar signal is completely extinguished after a few meters in the precipitation or it is unusable because of water accumulated on the receiver optics. Results from the algorithm, in addition to filling a gap in light rain, drizzle, and virga detection by radars, are of particular interest for the scientific community as they help to fully characterize the aerosol cycle, from emission to deposition, as precipitation is a crucial meteorological phenomenon accelerating atmospheric aerosol removal through the scavenging effect. Algorithm results will also help the understanding of long term aerosol–cloud interactions, exploiting the multi-year database from several MPLNET permanent observational sites across the globe. The algorithm is also applicable to other lidar and/or ceilometer network infrastructures in the framework of the Global Aerosol Watch (GAW) aerosol lidar observation network (GALION).