Since 2011, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has maintained the Better Life Initiative, which proposes a quality-of-life index called Better Life Index (BLI), consisting of 11 dimensions. This paper presents a multivariate analysis approach that aims to reduce the BLI dimensions. For this purpose, we applied factor extraction by main components to reorganize BLI variables into three dimensions (factors): dimension 1 - personal development and support factors; dimension 2 - financial balance; and dimension 3 - insecurity with the labor market. These three factors were used as criteria for the PROMETHEE-SAPEVO-M1 multicriteria method. We applied the methodology to data from 38 countries (35 from OECD and 3 non-OECD economies). As a result, we verified that Denmark, Iceland and Switzerland stood out as the countries with the best performances after the proposed analysis. Among the 38 countries evaluated, 19 showed positive flows, allowing the distribution into two well-defined groups. Also, adopting this hybrid methodology of multivariate analysis and multicriteria was advantageous because it reduced the evaluation criteria that the decision-maker needs to evaluate. We compared the results obtained by PROMETHEE-SAPEVO-M1 with the ViseKriterijumska Optimizacija $i$ Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) and Elimination Et Choix Traduisant la Realité - Multicriteria Ordinal (ELECTRE-MOr) methods, with remarkably similar results. The main contribution of this study is to provide a hybrid methodology composed of a statistical structuring approach (factor analysis) in a problem with multiple conflicting criteria. After all, the approach proposed in this article represented a 94% reduction in the decision maker’s cognitive effort.

Concerning the development of computational tools and solutions as a decision-making aid, this paper presents the results of the waspasWEB project, which strives to provide decision-makers with a readily accessible mechanism to employ the weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) method. The social contribution of the project encompasses the development of a user-friendly and publicly accessible internet tool, as well as a package launched on the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) to serve the community of users of the R language. The use of operational research methodologies is crucial to justify decisions, and this effort seeks to advance the adoption of such methodologies, offering managers, researchers, and the general public an intuitive and easily accessible multi-criteria decision-making tool. In this way, we present the technical specifications, usability, and interactivity of the user with the computational platform, being validated its viability through a hypothetical case study. At the end of the research, it exposes the limitations and feasibility of the proposed computational model along with future research.

The selection of a navy ship is essential to guarantee a country’s sovereignty, deterrence capabilities, and national security, especially in the face of possible conflicts and diplomatic instability. This paper proposes the integration of concepts related to multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methodology and machine learning, creating the Simple Aggregation of Preferences Expressed by Ordinal Vectors—Principal Components (SAPEVO-PC) method. The proposed method proposes an evolution of the SAPEVO family, allowing the inclusion of qualitative preferences, and adds concepts from Principal Component Analysis (PCA), aiming to simplify the decision-making process, maintaining precision and reliability. We carried out a case study analyzing 32 warships and ten quantitative criteria, demonstrating the practical application and effectiveness of the method. The generated rankings reflected both subjective perceptions and the quantitative performance data of each ship. This innovative integration of qualitative data with a quantitative machine learning algorithm ensures comprehensive and robust analyses, facilitating informed and strategic decisions. The results showed a high degree of consistency and reliability, with the top and bottom rankings remaining stable across different decision-makers’ perspectives. This study highlights the potential of SAPEVO-PC to improve decision-making efficiency in complex, multi-criteria environments, contributing to the field of marine science.

Modeling and Simulation (M&S) allows for reproducing medical procedures and services, understanding disease progression, and predicting treatment responses without risks to real patients. This study aims to simulate the ambulance service system of the Mobile Emergency Care Service (SAMU) in a Brazilian region, using the Arena software and Machine Learning (ML). The quantitative methodology combines mathematical modeling and a case study to analyze variables such as the number of ambulances, patient arrivals, waiting times, and workload. Using the Manchester Protocol as a reference, the Arena results feed a regression model to relate waiting times and the number of ambulances. Integrating these techniques allowed for predictions regarding the impact of different resource configurations. Based on real data, the numerical results indicated reduced waiting times with increased ambulances and streamlined resource allocation. Thus, by contributing to the operational efficiency of mobile emergency services, the findings also strengthen the resilient performance of the Unified Health System (SUS) in the face of adversities.

Esse artigo tem como objetivo mostrar o desenvolvimento um sistema de entrega e coleta de equipamentos e sensores para Veículos Aéreos não Tripulados (VANT)....