Introduction: The syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) is the most common cause of hyponatremia in cancer patients, occurring most frequently in patients with small cell lung cancer. However, this syndrome occurs extremely rarely in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The results of the clinical trials have revealed that immuno-oncological therapies are effective for long periods of time, providing hope for long survival and with a good quality of life. Case Presentation: We present the case of a female patient who was 62 years old at the time of diagnosis in 2016 who underwent surgery for a right pulmonary tumor (pulmonary adenocarcinoma) and subsequently underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. The patient had a left inoperable mediastinohilar relapse in 2018, which was treated using polychemotherapy The patient also had an occurrence of progressive metastasis and a syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) in 2019 for which immunotherapy was initiated. The patient has continued with immunotherapy until the time this study began to be written (April 2023), the results being the remission of hyponatremia, the clinical benefits and long-term survival. Discussion: The main therapeutic option for SIADH in cancer patients is the treatment of the underlying disease, and its correction depends almost exclusively on a good response to oncological therapy. The initiation of immunotherapy at the time of severe hyponatremia occurrence led to its remission as well as the remission of the other two episodes of hyponatremia, which the patient presented throughout the evolution of the disease, demonstrating an obvious causal relationship between SIADH and the favorable response to immunotherapy. Conclusions: Each patient must be approached individually, taking into account the various particular aspects. Immunotherapy proves to be the innovative treatment that contributes to increasing the survival of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and to increasing their quality of life.
Introduction: Prostate cancer has no initial clinical manifestation in the case of brain metastases since they are asymptomatic at first. This is why there is a high risk for clinicians to overlook these lesions, and they are often confused with other diseases. With all the improvements in diagnostic technological methods, which allow the early detection of lesions, and the progress in terms of systemic therapy associated with increased survival, an increase in incidence has also been noticed. Materials and methods: We report the case of a 64-year-old patient who presented himself to the Oncology Department of “St. Luca” Chronic Disease Hospital in Bucharest in November 2011 and received the following diagnosis: biopsied prostate neoplasm, local-regionally advanced, pelvic lymph node metastases. Results: After receiving complex oncological treatment, this patient represents a rare case of long-term progression-free survival (15 years). Discussions: This case has some particularities. According to the literature data, survival with metastatic prostate cancer is approximately 21 months, and cerebral metastases are found in only 2% of prostate cancer cases. This case is one of the few cases in the specialty literature that benefited from all therapeutic sequences; namely, total androgenic blockade, docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, and cabazitaxel. Conclusions: Brain metastases are an unfavorable prognostic factor in prostate cancer. The therapeutic options developed in recent years allow the improvement of survival.
Introduction: The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of online group meetings for breast cancer patients in the active phase of treatment. The group therapy sessions took place weekly, synchronously, online, on Zoom, with a total of 12 meetings lasting about 2.5 h per session, between December 2021 and February 2022. We analyzed the topics of discussion chosen by the participants, the structure of the group, the results obtained at the main scales of evaluation/monitoring of quality of life and the motivation of patients to participate in the therapeutic group. All patients were in the active phase of treatment (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormone therapy, etc.). The main goal of the group therapy was to reduce the stress related to the disease. Material and methods: Systematic observations included ABS psychological tests, EQ-5D-5L, HADS—Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Recurrence Fear Questionnaire; the questionnaires were administered at the beginning and at the end of the therapeutic intervention; the participation in the therapy and in the research of the patients began after signing the informed consent document; the intervention was evaluated at the end using a feedback questionnaire. The group was closed, and the participants signed an informed consent document and agreed to have the sessions recorded. Results: Comparing the initial with the final results of the psychological tests administered, there was an improvement in the quality of life of the participants in all areas, with a clinically significant decrease in the areas of pain and depression, along with an increase in perception of well-being, a decrease in FoP scores and an increase in the level of rationality about the disease. Conclusions: Group therapy for cancer patients was useful in improving the quality of life; the closed group, even online, provided a safe environment in which they could share feelings. A close correlation was noted between the scores obtained on the FoP-Q and HADS scales. It is evident that there is a strong relationship between FoP and depression. Results on these scales correlated well with results on the EQ-5D-5L quality of life questionnaire.
Currently, the treatment of malignant melanoma offers the longest and the most studied experience of innovative treatments in malignant pathology. The algorithm of the therapeutic decision in advanced or metastatic melanoma must comprise: the timing of the therapeutic initiation, the sequencing of the specific oncological treatment (radiotherapy and chemotherapy still being therapeutic alternatives in selected cases), the diagnosis and the management of adverse reactions. We present the case of a patient diagnosed with metastatic malignant melanoma in November 2019, who progressed successively under new systemic treatment throughout the 3 years of treatment and experienced skin reactions of various degrees of severity. The comprehensive response to secondary hilar pulmonary lymphatic determinations under subsequent chemotherapy was specific to the presented case. The occurrence of vitiligo secondary to immunotherapy is a favorable prognostic factor, but the occurrence of secondary cerebral determinations is an extremely severe prognostic factor in malignant melanoma and a challenge in making the therapeutic decision. Previous treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors may trigger a favorable response to systemic chemotherapy. The early and accurate diagnosis of the adverse events of the new therapies requires a multidisciplinary approach, because it can radically change the therapeutic decision.
Introduction: Fear of progression, anxiety and depression are highly interconnected in breast cancer patients and survivors, and they shape adaptation to the disease. Materials and Methods: This observational, cross-sectional, multicentre, non-interventional study was conducted in two hospitals in Romania during one month (July 2026). A total of 120 patients with breast cancer were assessed with three questionnaires: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Illness Cognition Questionnaire (ICQ) and the Short Fear of Progression Questionnaire (FoP-12). Results: Anxiety reached at least the borderline band in 58 patients (48.3%) and depression in 59 patients (49.2%). Fear of progression was dysfunctional in 46 patients (38.3%). High acceptance (64, 53.3%) and high perceived benefits (61, 50.8%) each described about half the sample, whereas high helplessness was uncommon (10, 8.3%). Discussion: Anxiety and depression were strongly related (ρ = .77, 95% CI [.67, .84], p < .001). Helplessness, anxiety, depression and fear of progression were all significantly and positively intercorrelated, with coefficients from .27 to .77, all q < .01. Conclusions: Anxiety, depression and fear of progression were common and closely interrelated, whereas differences between patient subgroups were few and modest once multiple testing was taken into account. These findings are exploratory and support routine psychological screening of breast cancer patients, but they do not identify established risk factors.