Botulinum toxin is a protein deriving from the bacteria Clostridium botulinum and it is widely used for the treatment of a variety of muscle hyperactivity syndromes and for cosmetic indications. Having a long-lasting effect, Botulinum toxin type A (BTA) is one of the most botulin toxin products used. Even if BTA has shown benefits in reducing the vertical lines between the eyebrows, Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) have been experienced as well, of which the most common ones are headache and drooping eyelids. In addition, since other local and systemic risks have been identified, a non-interventional post-authorization safety study (PASS) has been started. The aim of the present study was to report cases of skin toxicity associated with this drug, considering Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) existing on the Eudravigilance website. Among 1464 ICSRs sent to the EV database, 718 ICSRs, including 5154 PTs, reported BTA as a suspected drug associated with cutaneous toxicity. The majority of patients experiencing BTA-induced skin toxicity were female (92.1%) belonging mostly to the age group of 18–64 years. The most serious criteria, when reported, were “Other Medically Important Condition” and “Caused/prolonged hospitalization”, although the outcome was mainly reported as “Unknown”. The most reported PTs, related to skin disorders, were: “Erythema”, “Rash”, “Pruritus”, “Urticaria”, “Swelling face”, “Brow ptosis”, “Eyelid ptosis”, “Injection site pain”, and “Angioedema”. Considering that in most ICSRs, ADRs related to skin disorders were symptoms of hypersensitivity reactions which in some conditions could be life-threatening, further studies are required to better define the safety profile of BTA used for aesthetic procedures.

Although the safety profiles of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2) were evaluated in pre-authorization clinical trials, real-world data allow us to better define their benefit/risk ratio in the paediatric population. The current study aimed to evaluate the safety profiles of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in children by analysing the pharmacovigilance data of the European spontaneous reporting system database EudraVigilance (EV) in the period from 1 January 2021, to 1 October 2022. During our study period, overall 4838 ICSRs related to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines referring to 5–11-year-old subjects were retrieved from EV, of which 96.9% were related to BNT162b2 and 49.3% were related to males. A total of 12,751 Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFIs) were identified, of which 38.7% were serious. The most frequently reported AEFIs were pyrexia, headache, and vomiting. Only 20 Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) reported Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS) as an AEFI, all related to BNT162b2. The majority of MIS cases were females, and six cases were completely resolved at the time of reporting. Our results show a favourable risk–benefit profile for all mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in this paediatric sub-population, supporting their use in children. Considering the peculiarity and fragility of children, continuous safety monitoring of COVID-19 vaccines is required.

The first-generation tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors, larotrectinib and entrectinib, represent exciting new developments in cancer treatment that offer relevant, rapid, and long-lasting clinical benefits. Larotrectinib and entrectinib are recommended as first-line treatments for locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with positive TRK gene fusions. In this study, using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database between 2019 and 2022, a retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate the safety profiles of these drugs. During our study period, 807 individual case safety reports (ICSRs) related to larotrectinib or entrectinib were retrieved from the FAERS database, of which 48.7% referred to females and 24.7% referred to adult patients (18–64 years) with a median age of 61.0 years. A total of 1728 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were identified. The most frequently reported ADRs were dizziness and pain, which belong to the System Organ Classes (SOCs) “nervous system disorders” and “general disorders and administration site conditions”. Regarding all ADRs, the median time to onset was 37.0 days for larotrectinib and 12.0 days for entrectinib. No evident safety concerns emerged in the long-term safety profiles (>365 days). Only 18 ICSRs were related to pediatric populations (≤16 years), of which 94.0% of the ICSRs were related to larotrectinib. The median age was 10.5 years, while most patients were female (44.4%). Our results show favorable risk-benefit profiles for larotrectinib and entrectinib. Considering the increased use of neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) inhibitors, continuous safety monitoring of larotrectinib and entrectinib is required for the detection of possible new adverse drug reactions.

Background: Antibiotic resistance represents a growing concern. A new strategy developed to treat severe infections is represented by ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA/AVI). Despite the promising activities against more pathogens, continuous monitoring is required to identify potential antibiotic resistance in clinical practice settings. Therefore, real-world data from pharmacovigilance databases can help to better define the safety profile. Methods: We analyzed all Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) collected in the EudraVigilance database focusing on ICSRs with at least one adverse event (AE) potentially suggestive of drug resistance (DR) and drug ineffectiveness (DI). Results: A total of 654 ICSRs related to CZA/AVI were retrieved from EudraVigilance, of which N = 378 (57.8%) were related to male and N = 230 (35.1%) to adult patients. A total of 80.2% of all AEs were serious but with a positive outcome. Overall, we found N = 129 (19.7%) cases of potential DR or DI after CZA/AVI administration. The majority of CZA/AVI-induced DR or DI occurred in adult male patients. The most frequently reported AEs were “drug ineffective” and “pathogen resistance”. Lastly, CZA/AVI was mostly used for the treatment of “Klebsiella infection” and “Pneumonia”. Conclusions: The present study showed how pharmacovigilance could play a key role in generating evidence about the safety profile of CZA/AVI. Further studies are warranted.

Background. Cladribine belongs to the group of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) used to treat multiple sclerosis (MS). According to the highlights of a meeting held by the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) on 14 January 2022, cladribine may be associated with the occurrence of liver injury, and thus liver function monitoring is recommended. Objectives and methods. Using data from the European spontaneous reporting database (EudraVigilance-EV), we aimed to describe the main characteristics of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) reporting cases of hepatobiliary disorders related to cladribine. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was calculated to provide the probability of reporting hepatobiliary ICSRs among DMTs used to treat MS. Results. Overall, 118 ICSRs described the occurrence of cladribine-induced hepatobiliary ADRs. The majority of the ICSRs reported ADRs that were classified as serious (93%), and the outcome was mostly reported as “unknown” (50.8%). The most reported hepatobiliary disorders were drug-induced liver injury, abnormal hepatic function, ALT increases, liver disorders, hepatic failure, jaundice, lymphocyte count decreases, hepatotoxicity and hypertransaminasemia. The majority of cladribine-induced hepatic ADRs occurred in female patients belonging to the age group of 18–65 years. Conclusion. Considering the seriousness of cladribine-induced hepatic ADRs, a close monitoring of patients receiving this drug is highly recommended. In this context, further pharmacovigilance studies evaluating the hepatic safety profile of cladribine are strongly needed.

During pre-approval clinical trials, the safety of axi-cel, a second-generation CAR-T-cell therapy directed against CD19, which dramatically improved the prognosis of intractable B-cell lymphomas, has been investigated only in about 400 patients. Therefore, additional information on this issue is urgently needed. In the present paper, we evaluated the 2905 ICSRs with axi-cel as the suspected drug that had been uploaded in the EudraVigilance database from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2022. About 80% of the reported adverse events were serious, and about 20% of them did not fully resolve or caused death. The adverse events most-frequently reported were Nervous system disorders (25.6%) and, among them, immune-effector-cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, followed by Immune system disorders (23.1%), General disorders and administration site conditions (12.0%), Blood and lymphatic system disorders (7.2%), and Infections and infestations (5.8%). Disproportionality analysis showed that the frequency of reported adverse events related to the nervous system was higher with axi-cel than with the other approved CAR-T-cells, except brexu-cel. In conclusion, real-world pharmacovigilance data showed that nervous system and immune system disorders are the adverse events most reported in axi-cel-related ICSRs and suggest that axi-cel could be more neurotoxic than other CAR-T-cells.