Introduction: Effective pain management is crucial for patient care, impacting comfort, recovery, and overall well-being. Traditional subjective pain assessment methods can be challenging, particularly in specific patient populations. This research explores an alternative approach using computer vision (CV) to detect pain through facial expressions. Methods: The study implements the YOLOv8 real-time object detection model to analyze facial expressions indicative of pain. Given four pain datasets, a dataset of pain-expressing faces was compiled, and each image was carefully labeled based on the presence of pain-associated Action Units (AUs). The labeling distinguished between two classes: pain and no pain. The pain category included specific AUs (AU4, AU6, AU7, AU9, AU10, and AU43) following the Prkachin and Solomon Pain Intensity (PSPI) scoring method. Images showing these AUs with a PSPI score above 2 were labeled as expressing pain. The manual labeling process utilized an open-source tool, makesense.ai, to ensure precise annotation. The dataset was then split into training and testing subsets, each containing a mix of pain and no-pain images. The YOLOv8 model underwent iterative training over 10 epochs. The model’s performance was validated using precision, recall, and mean Average Precision (mAP) metrics, and F1 score. Results: When considering all classes collectively, our model attained a mAP of 0.893 at a threshold of 0.5. The precision for “pain” and “nopain” detection was 0.868 and 0.919, respectively. F1 scores for the classes “pain”, “nopain”, and “all classes” reached a peak value of 0.80. Finally, the model was tested on the Delaware dataset and in a real-world scenario. Discussion: Despite limitations, this study highlights the promise of using real-time computer vision models for pain detection, with potential applications in clinical settings. Future research will focus on evaluating the model’s generalizability across diverse clinical scenarios and its integration into clinical workflows to improve patient care.

Background: Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, although effective for pain management following total hip arthroplasty (THA), does not cover skin analgesia. In this randomized controlled trial, we compared the effectiveness of PENG block combined with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block or wound infiltration (WI) on postoperative analgesia and functional outcomes. Methods: Fifty patients undergoing posterior-approached THA under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive LFCN block with 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine or WI with 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. In both groups, PENG block was performed by injecting 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. Primary outcomes were static and dynamic pain scores (0–10 numeric rating scale) measured in the first 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative opioid consumption, functional assessment and length of hospital stay. Results: Postoperative static NRS of patients receiving LFCN was higher than that of patients receiving WI at 6 h but lower at 24 h, with a median (IQR) of 3 (2–4) vs. 2 (1–2) (p < 0.001) and 2 (2–3) vs. 3 (3–4) (p = 0.02), respectively. Static pain scores at 12 h did not show significant differences, with an NRS of 3 (2–4) for WI vs. 3 (3–4) for LFCN (p = 0.94). Dynamic pain and range of movement followed a similar trend. No significant differences were detected in other outcomes. Conclusions: LFCN block was not inferior to WI for postoperative analgesia and functional recovery in association with PENG block during the first postoperative day, although it had worse short-term pain scores. Based on these results, it is reasonable to consider LFCN block as a valid alternative to WI or even a complementary technique added to WI to enhance skin analgesia during the first 24 h after THA. Future studies are expected to confirm this hypothesis and find the best combination between PENG block and other techniques to enhance analgesia after THA.

Background: Antibiotic resistance represents a growing concern. A new strategy developed to treat severe infections is represented by ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA/AVI). Despite the promising activities against more pathogens, continuous monitoring is required to identify potential antibiotic resistance in clinical practice settings. Therefore, real-world data from pharmacovigilance databases can help to better define the safety profile. Methods: We analyzed all Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) collected in the EudraVigilance database focusing on ICSRs with at least one adverse event (AE) potentially suggestive of drug resistance (DR) and drug ineffectiveness (DI). Results: A total of 654 ICSRs related to CZA/AVI were retrieved from EudraVigilance, of which N = 378 (57.8%) were related to male and N = 230 (35.1%) to adult patients. A total of 80.2% of all AEs were serious but with a positive outcome. Overall, we found N = 129 (19.7%) cases of potential DR or DI after CZA/AVI administration. The majority of CZA/AVI-induced DR or DI occurred in adult male patients. The most frequently reported AEs were “drug ineffective” and “pathogen resistance”. Lastly, CZA/AVI was mostly used for the treatment of “Klebsiella infection” and “Pneumonia”. Conclusions: The present study showed how pharmacovigilance could play a key role in generating evidence about the safety profile of CZA/AVI. Further studies are warranted.

Foot and ankle surgery is often associated with significant postoperative pain that may delay mobilization and recovery. For this reason, effective perioperative analgesia is essential to improve outcomes, minimize opioid use, and enable safe early discharge when appropriate. This review provides an updated overview of regional anesthesia techniques for foot and ankle surgery, highlighting anatomical considerations, ultrasound guidance, and patient-tailored block selection. Different techniques will be specifically addressed over neuraxial and nerve blocks, such as the Mayo block and intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier block), as well as the emerging WALANT approach for selected cases. Ultrasound guidance has become a gold-standard, enhancing precision and safety compared to landmark-based methods. Multimodal analgesia combining regional blocks with non-opioid medications and adjuvants like intravenous dexamethasone further optimizes pain control while limiting opioid requirements. In ambulatory settings, motor-sparing techniques and short-acting spinal agents are emphasized to support rapid recovery and same-day discharge. By integrating anatomical knowledge with ultrasound and multimodal strategies, perioperative pain management for foot and ankle surgery can be tailored to balance effective analgesia with early mobilization and patient safety.

Shoulder surgery has radically evolved within the last 70 years, from a marginal orthopedic sub-specialty to an area of great research and advancement; consequently, anesthetic techniques have undergone important development. In fact, a wide variety of anesthetic strategies have emerged, to provide anesthesia and post-operative analgesia: general anesthesia (GA), regional anesthesia (RA), or combined GA and RA. A literature review on online databases was carried out about the different anesthetic approaches for shoulder surgery and their evolution through the years, taking in consideration papers from 1929 to 2021. A comprehensive preoperative assessment of patients undergoing shoulder surgery allows to identify and modify potential risk factors and complications of general anesthesia. Moreover, the use of ultrasound-guided regional blocks could improve the effectiveness of these techniques and bring better postoperative outcomes. Anesthetic management for shoulder surgery has progressed drastically during the last century. More studies are needed to finally standardize anesthetic techniques for specific procedure.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-c) is an uncommon, but serious, inflammatory response that occurs after SARS-CoV-2 infection. As time went by, MIS-c was also reported as a potential adverse event following COVID-19 vaccination. A descriptive analysis was performed of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) associated with anti COVID-19 vaccines and related to the pediatric population from 2020 to 2022. The present pharmacovigilance study aimed to describe cases of MIS-c following COVID-19 vaccination, stratified by sex, reported in the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) and meeting the Brighton Collaboration criteria for case definition. We assessed all suspected cases through the case definition and classification of the Brighton Collaboration Group, and only definitive, probable, and possible cases were included in the analysis. The Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was computed to assess if males have a lower/higher probability of reporting ICSRs with MIS-c compared with females. Overall, we found 79 cases of potentially reported MIS-c following vaccination. This study demonstrated that MIS-c following vaccination was more commonly reported for male subjects with a median age of 10 years (IQR 10.0–11.4), especially after the first dose of anti COVID-19 vaccines with a median time to onset of 27 days. Even so, the rate of occurrence of MIS-c following anti COVID-19 vaccines is lower (0.12/100,000 vaccinated subjects; 95% CI, 0.12–0.13). Overall, all ICSRs were serious and caused or prolonged hospitalization. Finally, disproportionality analysis showed that males had a higher reporting probability of MIS-c compared with females following immunization with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Since only a few years of marketing are available, further data from real-life contexts are needed.