Flow cytometry is a highly sensitive and specific approach for discriminating between normal and clonal plasma cells in multiple myeloma. Uniform response criteria after treatment have been established by the International Myeloma Working Group and the EuroFlow Group; however, the way in which flow cytometry data are reported has suffered from no collaborative or multicentre efforts. This study, involving 8 expert laboratories and 12 clinical hematology units of the Lazio region in Italy, aims to produce a uniform and shared report among the various Centres. From the pre-analytical phase to sample processing, data acquisition, analysis, and evaluation of the potential limitations and pitfalls of the entire process, the study reaches a final conclusion shared by laboratories and clinicians according to the most updated principles and recommendations. The aim was to identify the necessary data to be included in the clinical report by using multiple-choice questionnaires at every single stage of the process. An agreement of more than 75% of the laboratories was considered mandatory for the data to be included in the report. By ensuring the operational autonomy of each laboratory, this study provides a clear report that limits subjective interpretations and highlights possible bias in the process, better supporting clinical decision-making.

Background Metastasis is the main cause of breast cancer (BC) mortality. Increasing evidence points to a role of syndecan-1 (CD138) expression as a prognostic marker involved in BC tissue and leptomeningeal metastasis. Aim of this study was to investigate and compare syndecan-1 tissue expression and localization in primary and secondary BC, focusing on brain metastases. Methods Syndecan-1 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry. Focal vs diffuse (< or > 50% of cancer cells, respectively) pattern of expression, cellular localization (cytoplasm vs membrane) and intensity of immunostaining on neoplastic cells were evaluated. Moreover, the extent and pattern of expression of syndecan-1 were compared between primary tumors and paired metastases and correlated with the tumor intrinsic subtype. Results A total of 23 cases, 10 with paired primary and metastatic tumor and 13 brain metastases, were evaluated. Syndecan-1 was expressed in both primary and metastatic BC. A diffuse cytoplasmic expression was observed in most primary BCs; by contrast, all metastatic lesions showed a membrane pattern of expression, suggesting a shift in cellular localization of syndecan-1 during the metastatic process. Concerning the extent of expression, we observed in metastatic lesions, a trend of association between intrinsic subtypes and extent of positivity. In particular, both BC characterized by overexpression of HER2 and triple-negative tumors were correlated with a diffuse pattern of expression with a moderate to strong intensity. Conclusion A diffuse cytoplasmic expression was observed in most primary BCs; by contrast, all metastatic lesions showed a membrane pattern of expression, suggesting a shift in cellular localization of syndecan-1 during the metastatic process.

Background: Early relapse in multiple myeloma (MM) is a major predictor of poor prognosis, regardless of cytogenetic risk or treatment intensity. Methods: Here we analyzed 1026 MM patients treated across 12 Italian hematology centers. FHR was defined as progression-free survival (PFS) ≤18 months in transplant-eligible (TE) and ≤12 months in non-transplant-eligible (NTE) patients. Logistic regression and ROC analysis were used to identify significant predictors of FHR and build a risk score. Results: FHR status was identified in 175 patients (17%). These patients had significantly shorter PFS (7 vs. 57.5 months) and overall survival (19 months vs. not reached; p < 0.001). FHR status was associated with higher median LDH, lower Hb level, higher creatinine level and lower platelets count. Modified EASIX formula was built by these significant continuous variables, to be tested in a logistic analysis: [(LDH × creatinine)/(Hb × PLT) × 100]. A significantly higher rate of FHR was found with a score > 2.0 (89% vs. 11%, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic analysis selected the above formula, ECOG PS ≥ 2 and ISS III as factors associated with FHR. Scoring these variables according to OR, three groups of patients were segregated with a rate of FHR patients of 7%, 29.5%, and 63.5%, respectively. Treatment with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies was associated with lower FHR frequency. Conclusions: This study proposes a simple, clinically applicable model to identify FHR MM patients early in their disease course. However, very in-depth biological tools, not available in clinical practice, are needed to identify singularly risk of becoming FHR.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) harboring KMT2A rearrangements (KMT2A-r) accounts for approximately 5–10% of newly diagnosed cases and represents a high-risk AML subtype associated with poor clinical outcomes despite intensive treatment strategies, including allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). KMT2A-r AML is also characterized by a higher incidence of extramedullary disease compared with other AML subtypes. Therapeutic options for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease, particularly after post-HSCT relapse, remain extremely limited. In recent years, menin inhibitors have emerged as a promising targeted therapeutic class for KMT2A-r and NPM1-mutated AML by disrupting the aberrant HOX/MEIS1 transcriptional program. Revumenib, a first-in-class menin inhibitor, has shown encouraging efficacy in early-phase clinical trials. Other menin inhibitors, including ziftomenib, bleximenib, and enzomenib, have also demonstrated clinical activity, with distinct pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety profiles. We report the case of a 36-year-old patient with KMT2A-r AML who relapsed after HSCT with both bone marrow and hepatic involvement. Compassionate-use treatment with revumenib (160 mg twice daily on days 1–28 of each 28-day cycle) induced, after two treatment cycles, complete hematologic remission with no detectable abnormal myeloid blast population by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and complete radiological resolution of hepatic lesions. However, despite prior intrathecal CNS-directed therapy and sustained systemic disease control, the patient subsequently developed an isolated central nervous system (CNS) relapse. This case highlights a potential discordance between systemic and CNS disease control during menin inhibitor therapy and emphasizes the need for further investigation into CNS surveillance and disease management in patients achieving deep systemic responses.