Keeping track of blood glucose levels non-invasively is now possible due to diverse breakthroughs in wearable sensors technology coupled with advanced biomedical signal processing. However, each user might have different requirements and priorities when it comes to selecting a self-monitoring solution. After extensive research and careful selection, we have presented a comprehensive survey on noninvasive/pain-free blood glucose monitoring methods from the recent five years (2012-2016). Several techniques, from bioinformatics, computer science, chemical engineering, microwave technology, etc., are discussed in order to cover a wide variety of solutions available for different scales and preferences. We categorize the noninvasive techniques into nonsample- and sample-based techniques, which we further grouped into optical, nonoptical, intermittent, and continuous. The devices manufactured or being manufactured for noninvasive monitoring are also compared in this paper. These techniques are then analyzed based on certain constraints, which include time efficiency, comfort, cost, portability, power consumption, etc., a user might experience. Recalibration, time, and power efficiency are the biggest challenges that require further research in order to satisfy a large number of users. In order to solve these challenges, artificial intelligence (AI) has been employed by many researchers. AI-based estimation and decision models hold the future of noninvasive glucose monitoring in terms of accuracy, cost effectiveness, portability, efficiency, etc. The significance of this paper is twofold: first, to bridge the gap between IT and medical field; and second, to bridge the gap between end users and the solutions (hardware and software).

Trust evaluation and management schemes have been extensively employed in a bid to alleviate diverse insider attacks. These trust values are often ascertained by taking into consideration trust parameters to determine the honesty and reliability of a vehicle and evaluating a weighted sum of the said parameters. To achieve precision and to reflect a reasonable impact of these parameters, rational weight values are imperative. Accordingly, this research primarily emphasizes on the quantification of weights associated with the contributing trust attributes by proposing a novel trust management mechanism that utilizes contextual information in addition to employing relevant impacting quantities as weights to formulate trust evaluations. Moreover, the envisaged trust management model incorporates 1) attack resilience while constituting certain parameters and 2) an adaptive and flexible threshold to mitigate malevolent behaviors. The simulation results depict that the devised parameters and the formulated trust aggregation cater to the dynamic nature of vehicular networks demonstrating the rationality of the weights’ quantification, and the introduction of the adaptive threshold for misbehavior detection aligns well with the requirements of the ever-changing vehicular networks.

Recent technological breakthroughs in vehicular ad hoc networks and the Internet of Things (IoT) have transformed vehicles into smart objects thus paving the way for the evolution of the promising paradigm of the Internet of Vehicles (IoV), which is an integral constituent of the modern intelligent transportation systems. Simply put, IoV attributes to the IoT-on-wheels, wherein vehicles broadcast safety-critical information among one another (and their immediate ambiences) for guaranteeing highly reliable and efficacious traffic flows. This, therefore, necessitates the need to fully secure an IoV network since a single malicious message is capable enough of jeopardizing the safety of the nearby vehicles (and their respective passengers) and vulnerable pedestrians. It is also pertinent to mention that a malicious attacker, i.e., vehicle, is not only able to send counterfeited safety-critical messages to its nearby vehicles and the traffic management authorities but could further enable a compromised vehicle to broadcast both spoofed coordinates and speed-related information. It is, therefore, of the utmost importance that malicious entities and their messages be identified and subsequently eliminated from the network before they are able to manipulate the entire network for their malicious gains. This paper, therefore, delineates on the convergence of the notion of trust with the IoV primarily in terms of its underlying rationale. It further highlights the opportunities which transpire as a result of this convergence to secure an IoV network. Finally, open research challenges, together with the recommendations for addressing the same, have been discussed.

The rapid proliferation of the emerging yet promising notion of the Internet-of-Vehicles (IoV) has led to the development of a variety of conventional trust assessment schemes to tackle insider attackers. The primary reliance of these frameworks is on the accumulation of individual trust attributes. While aggregating these influential parameters, weights are often associated with each individual attribute to reflect its impact on the final trust score. It is of paramount importance that such weights be precise to lead to an accurate trust assessment. Moreover, the value of the minimum acceptable trust threshold employed for the identification of dishonest vehicles needs to be carefully defined to avoid delayed or erroneous detection. This paper employs an IoT data set from CRAWDAD by suitably transforming it into an IoV format. This data set encompasses information regarding 18,226 interactions among 76 nodes, both honest and dishonest. First, the influencing parameters (i.e., packet delivery ratio, familiarity, timeliness and interaction frequency) were computed, and two feature matrices were formed. The first matrix (FM1) takes into account all the pairwise individual parameters as individual features, whereas the second matrix (FM2) considers the average of all pairwise computations performed for each individual parameter as one feature. Subsequently, unsupervised learning is employed to achieve the ground truth prior to applying supervised machine learning algorithms for classification purposes. It is worth noting that Subspace KNN yielded a perfect precision, recall, and the F1-score equal to 1 for individual parametric scores, whereas Subspace Discriminant returned an ideal precision, recall, and the F1-score equal to 1 for mean parametric scores. It is also evident from extensive simulations that FM2 yielded more accurate classification results compared to FM1. Furthermore, decision boundaries among honest and dishonest vehicles have also been computed for respective feature matrices.