Respiratory drive, the intensity of the respiratory center’s output, determines the effort exerted in each breath. The increasing awareness of the adverse effects of both strong and weak respiratory efforts during mechanical ventilation on patient outcome brings attention to the respiratory drive of the critically ill patient. Critical illness can affect patients’ respiratory drive through multiple pathways, mainly operating through three feedback systems: cortical, metabolic, and chemical. The chemical feedback system, defined as the response of the respiratory center’s output to changes in arterial blood gases and pH, is one of the most important determinants of respiratory drive. The purpose of this state-of-the-art review is to describe the determinants of respiratory drive in critically ill patients, review the tools available to assess respiratory drive at the bedside, and discuss the implications of altered respiratory drive during mechanical ventilation. An analysis that relates arterial carbon dioxide levels with brain’s response to this stimulus will be presented, contrasting the brain’s responses to the patient’s ability to generate effective alveolar ventilation, both during unassisted breathing and with different modes of ventilatory assist. This analysis may facilitate comprehension of the pathophysiology of respiratory drive in critically ill patients. As we aim to avoid both over- and under-assistance with mechanical ventilation, considering the patients’ respiratory drive at the bedside may improve clinical assessment and management of the patient and the ventilator.

Respiratory rate is one of the key variables that is set and monitored during mechanical ventilation. As part of increasing efforts to optimize mechanical ventilation, it is prudent to expand understanding of the potential harmful effects of not only volume and pressures but also respiratory rate. The mechanisms by which respiratory rate may become injurious during mechanical ventilation can be distinguished in two broad categories. In the first, well-recognized category, concerning both controlled and assisted ventilation, the respiratory rate per se may promote ventilator-induced lung injury, dynamic hyperinflation, ineffective efforts, and respiratory alkalosis. It may also be misinterpreted as distress delaying the weaning process. In the second category, which concerns only assisted ventilation, the respiratory rate may induce injury in a less apparent way by remaining relatively quiescent while being challenged by chemical feedback. By responding minimally to chemical feedback, respiratory rate leaves the control of V̇e almost exclusively to inspiratory effort. In such cases, when assist is high, weak inspiratory efforts promote ineffective triggering, periodic breathing, and diaphragmatic atrophy. Conversely, when assist is low, diaphragmatic efforts are intense and increase the risk for respiratory distress, asynchronies, ventilator-induced lung injury, diaphragmatic injury, and cardiovascular complications. This review thoroughly presents the multiple mechanisms by which respiratory rate may induce injury during mechanical ventilation, drawing the attention of critical care physicians to the potential injurious effects of respiratory rate insensitivity to chemical feedback during assisted ventilation.

During passive mechanical ventilation, the driving pressure of the respiratory system is an important mediator of ventilator-induced lung injury. Monitoring of driving pressure during assisted ventilation, similar to controlled ventilation, could be a tool to identify patients at risk of ventilator-induced lung injury. The aim of this study was to describe driving pressure over time and to identify whether and when high driving pressure occurs in critically ill patients during assisted ventilation. Sixty-two patients fulfilling criteria for assisted ventilation were prospectively studied. Patients were included when the treating physician selected proportional assist ventilation (PAV+), a mode that estimates respiratory system compliance. In these patients, continuous recordings of all ventilator parameters were obtained for up to 72 h. Driving pressure was calculated as tidal volume-to-respiratory system compliance ratio. The distribution of driving pressure and tidal volume values over time was examined, and periods of sustained high driving pressure (≥ 15 cmH2O) and of stable compliance were identified and analyzed. The analysis included 3200 h of ventilation, consisting of 8.8 million samples. For most (95%) of the time, driving pressure was < 15 cmH2O and tidal volume < 11 mL/kg (of ideal body weight). In most patients, high driving pressure was observed for short periods of time (median 2.5 min). Prolonged periods of high driving pressure were observed in five patients (8%). During the 661 periods of stable compliance, high driving pressure combined with a tidal volume ≥ 8 mL/kg was observed only in 11 cases (1.6%) pertaining to four patients. High driving pressure occurred almost exclusively when respiratory system compliance was low, and compliance above 30 mL/cmH2O excluded the presence of high driving pressure with 90% sensitivity and specificity. In critically ill patients fulfilling criteria for assisted ventilation, and ventilated in PAV+ mode, sustained high driving pressure occurred in a small, yet not negligible number of patients. The presence of sustained high driving pressure was not associated with high tidal volume, but occurred almost exclusively when compliance was below 30 mL/cmH2O.

Rationale: Because of the effects of aging on the respiratory system, it is conceivable that the association between driving pressure and mortality depends on age. Objectives: We endeavored to evaluate whether the association between driving pressure and mortality of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) varies across the adult lifespan, hypothesizing that it is stronger in older, including very old (⩾80 yr), patients. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of individual patient-level data from seven ARDS Network and PETAL Network randomized controlled trials (“ARDSNet cohort”). We tested our hypothesis in a second, independent, national cohort (“Hellenic cohort”). We performed both binary logistic and Cox regression analyses including the interaction term between age (as a continuous variable) and driving pressure at baseline (i.e., the day of trial enrollment) as the predictor and 90-day mortality as the dependent variable. Measurements and Main Results: On the basis of data from 4,567 patients with ARDS included in the ARDSNet cohort, we found that the effect of driving pressure on mortality depended on age (P = 0.01 for the interaction between age as a continuous variable and driving pressure). The difference in driving pressure between survivors and nonsurvivors significantly changed across the adult lifespan (P < 0.01). In both cohorts, a driving pressure threshold of 11 cm H2O was associated with mortality in very old patients. Conclusions: Data from randomized controlled trials with strict inclusion criteria suggest that the effect of driving pressure on the mortality of patients with ARDS may depend on age. These results may advocate for a personalized age-dependent mechanical ventilation approach.

Purpose of review: Complications of mechanical ventilation, such as ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction (VIDD), adversely affect the outcome of critically ill patients. Although mostly studied during control ventilation, it is increasingly appreciated that VILI and VIDD also occur during assisted ventilation. Hence, current research focuses on identifying ways to monitor and deliver protective ventilation in assisted modes. This review describes the operating principles of proportional modes of assist, their implications for lung and diaphragm protective ventilation, and the supporting clinical data. Recent findings: Proportional modes of assist, proportional assist ventilation, PAV, and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist, NAVA, deliver a pressure assist that is proportional to the patient's effort, enabling ventilation to be better controlled by the patient's brain. This control underlies the potential of proportional modes to avoid over-assist and under-assist, improve patient--ventilator interaction, and provide protective ventilation. Indeed, in clinical studies, proportional modes have been associated with reduced asynchronies, enhanced diaphragmatic recovery, and limitation of excessive tidal volume. Additionally, proportional modes facilitate better monitoring of the delivery of protective assisted ventilation. Summary: Physiological rationale and clinical data suggest a potential role for proportional modes of assist in providing and monitoring lung and diaphragm protective ventilation.