Karlheinz Knickel

Dr. Karlheinz Knickel

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2018 in Journal of Rural Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SŠSandra Šūmane
Sandra Šūmane
IKIlona Kunda
Ilona Kunda
KKKarlheinz Knickel
Karlheinz Knickel
ASAgnes Strauss
Agnes Strauss
TTTalis Tisenkopfs
Talis Tisenkopfs
AAAmit Ashkenazy
Amit Ashkenazy

1 April 2018 in Journal of Rural Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KRKees de Roest
Kees de Roest
PFPaolo Ferrari
Paolo Ferrari
KKKarlheinz Knickel
Karlheinz Knickel

1 April 2018 in Journal of Rural Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMarlinde E. Koopmans
Marlinde E. Koopmans
ERElke Rogge
Elke Rogge
EMEvy Mettepenningen
Evy Mettepenningen
KKKarlheinz Knickel
Karlheinz Knickel
SŠSandra Šūmane
Sandra Šūmane

12 June 2017 in International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KKKarlheinz Knickel
Karlheinz Knickel
AAAmit Ashkenazy
Amit Ashkenazy
TCTzruya Calvão Chebach
Tzruya Calvão Chebach
NPNicholas Parrot
Nicholas Parrot

1 April 2018 in Journal of Rural Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMaria Rivera
Maria Rivera
KKKarlheinz Knickel
Karlheinz Knickel
Ignacio De Los Rios-CarmenadoIgnacio De Los Rios-Carmenado
Ignacio De Los Rios-Carmenado
AAAmit Ashkenazy
Amit Ashkenazy
DPDavid Qvist Pears
David Qvist Pears
SŠSandra Šūmane
Sandra Šūmane

22 November 2019 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMarina Knickel
Marina Knickel
KKKarlheinz Knickel
Karlheinz Knickel
FGFrancesca Galli
Francesca Galli
DMDamian Maye
Damian Maye
HWHan Wiskerke
Han Wiskerke
Scholars in sustainability science as well as research funders increasingly recognize that a shift from disciplinary and interdisciplinary science to transdisciplinary (TD) research is required to address ever more complex sustainability challenges. Evidence shows that addressing real-world societal problems can be best achieved through collaborative research where diverse actors contribute different kinds of knowledge. While the potential benefits of TD research are widely recognized, its implementation remains a challenge. In this article, we develop a framework that supports reflection and co-learning. Our approach fosters monitoring of the collaboration processes, helps to assess the progress made and encourages continuous reflection and improvement of the research processes. The TD co-learning framework has four dimensions and 44 criteria. It is based on a substantial literature review and was tested in a Horizon 2020-funded research project ROBUST, which is applying experimental governance techniques to improve rural-urban relations in eleven European regions. The results demonstrate that the framework covers the key facets of TD collaboration and that all four broad dimensions matter. Each research-practice team reflected on how their collaboration is going and what needs to be improved. Indeed, the coordination team was able to see how well TD collaboration is functioning at a project level. We believe the framework will be valuable for actors involved in the planning and implementation of any type of multi-actor, interactive, innovation, transformation and action-oriented research project.