Clair Hebron

Dr. Clair Hebron


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 June 2020 in Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GDGeorgi Daluiso-King
Georgi Daluiso-King
CHClair Hebron
Clair Hebron
It is considered that implementation of the biopsychosocial model (BPSM) within physiotherapy is affected by its lack of conceptual clarity. This concept analysis explores the meaning and offers co...

1 April 2020 in Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSPetter Søndenå
Petter Søndenå
GDGeorgi Dalusio-King
Georgi Dalusio-King
CHClair Hebron
Clair Hebron

3 May 2015 in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KPKathryn Palmer
Kathryn Palmer
CHClair Hebron
Clair Hebron
JWJonathan Mark Williams
Jonathan Mark Williams
Dynamic knee valgus and internal femoral rotation are proposed to be contributory risk factors for patellofemoral pain and anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Multimodal interventions including hip abductor strengthening or functional motor control programmes have a positive impact of pain, however their effect on knee kinematics and muscle strength is less clear. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of isolated hip abductor strengthening and a functional motor control exercise on knee kinematics and hip abductor strength. This prospective, randomised, repeated measures design included 29 asymptomatic volunteers presenting with increase knee valgus and femoral internal rotation. Participants completed either isolated hip abductor strengthening or a functional motor control exercise for 5 weeks. Knee kinematics were measured using inertial sensors during 2 functional activities and hip abductor strength measured using a load cell during isometric hip abduction. There were no significant differences in dynamic knee valgus and internal rotation following the isolated hip abductor or functional motor control intervention, and no significant differences between the groups for knee angles. Despite this, the actual magnitude of reduction in valgus was 10° and 5° for the functional motor control group and strengthening group respectively. The actual magnitude of reduction in internal rotation was 9° and 18° for the functional motor control group and strengthening group respectively. Therefore there was a tendency towards clinically significant improvements in knee kinematics in both exercise groups. A statistically significant improvement in hip abductor strength was evident for the functional motor control group (27% increase; p = 0.008) and strengthening group (35% increase; p = 0.009) with no significant difference between the groups being identified (p = 0.475). Isolated hip strengthening and functional motor control exercises resulted in non-statistically significant changes in knee kinematics, however there was a clear trend towards clinically meaningful reductions in valgus and internal rotation. Both groups demonstrated similar significant gains in hip abductor strength suggesting either approach could be used to strengthen the hip abductors.

30 April 2010 in Manual Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EWElaine Willett
Elaine Willett
CHClair Hebron
Clair Hebron
OKOliver Krouwel
Oliver Krouwel

1 February 2010 in Manual Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OKOliver Krouwel
Oliver Krouwel
CHClair Hebron
Clair Hebron
EWElaine Willett
Elaine Willett

1 June 2017 in Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MRMartin Rabey
Martin Rabey
THToby Hall
Toby Hall
CHClair Hebron
Clair Hebron
TPThorvaldur Skuli Palsson
Thorvaldur Skuli Palsson
SCSteffan Wittrup Christensen
Steffan Wittrup Christensen
NMNiamh Moloney
Niamh Moloney
With conflicting evidence regarding the effectiveness of manual therapy calls have arisen within some quarters of the physiotherapy profession challenging the continued use of manual skills for assessment and treatment. A reconceptualisation of the importance of manual examination findings is put forward, based upon a contemporary understanding of pain science, rather than considering these skills only in terms of how they should "guide" manual therapy interventions. The place for manual examination findings within complex, multidimensional presentations is considered using vignettes describing the presentations of five people with low back pain. As part of multidimensional, individualised management, the balance of evidence relating to the effectiveness, mechanisms of action and rationale for manual skills is discussed. It is concluded that if manual examination and therapeutic skills are used in a manner consistent with a contemporary understanding of pain science, multidimensional patient profiles and a person-centred approach, their selective and judicious use still has an important role.