Luciano Pereira

Dr. Luciano Pereira

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 February 2021 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LKLucian Kaack
Lucian Kaack
MWMatthias Weber
Matthias Weber
EIEmilie Isasa
Emilie Isasa
ZKZohreh Karimi
Zohreh Karimi
SLShan Li
Shan Li
SJSteven Jansen
Steven Jansen
Summary: Embolism spreading in angiosperm xylem occurs via mesoporous pit membranes between vessels. Here, we investigate how the size of pore constrictions in pit membranes is related to pit membrane thickness and embolism resistance. Pit membranes were modelled as multiple layers to investigate how pit membrane thickness and the number of intervessel pits per vessel determine pore constriction sizes, the probability of encountering large pores, and embolism resistance. These estimations were complemented by measurements of pit membrane thickness, embolism resistance, and number of intervessel pits per vessel in stem xylem (n = 31, 31 and 20 species, respectively). The modelled constriction sizes in pit membranes decreased with increasing membrane thickness, explaining the measured relationship between pit membrane thickness and embolism resistance. The number of pits per vessel affected constriction size and embolism resistance much less than pit membrane thickness. Moreover, a strong relationship between modelled and measured embolism resistance was observed. Pore constrictions provide a mechanistic explanation for why pit membrane thickness determines embolism resistance, which suggests that hydraulic safety can be uncoupled from hydraulic efficiency. Although embolism spreading remains puzzling and encompasses more than pore constriction sizes, angiosperms are unlikely to have leaky pit membranes, which enables tensile transport of water.

10 January 2022 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JGJoannès Guillemot
Joannès Guillemot
NMNicolas K. Martin‐StPaul
Nicolas K. Martin‐StPaul
LBLeticia Bulascoschi
Leticia Bulascoschi
LPLourens Poorter
Lourens Poorter
XMXavier Morin
Xavier Morin
PBPedro Brancalion
Pedro Brancalion

11 May 2019 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Fernanda De Vasconcellos BarrosFernanda De Vasconcellos Barros
Fernanda De Vasconcellos Barros
PBPaulo R. L. Bittencourt
Paulo R. L. Bittencourt
MBMauro Brum
Mauro Brum
NRNatalia Restrepo‐Coupe
Natalia Restrepo‐Coupe
LPLuciano Pereira
Luciano Pereira
RORafael S. Oliveira
Rafael S. Oliveira

26 April 2023 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JTJulia Valentim Tavares
Julia Valentim Tavares
RORafael S. Oliveira
Rafael S. Oliveira
MMMaurizio Mencuccini
Maurizio Mencuccini
Caroline Signori-MüllerCaroline Signori-Müller
Caroline Signori-Müller
LPLuciano Pereira
Luciano Pereira
DGDavid Galbraith
David Galbraith
Tropical forests face increasing climate risk1,2, yet our ability to predict their response to climate change is limited by poor understanding of their resistance to water stress. Although xylem embolism resistance thresholds (for example, $$\varPsi $$ Ψ 50) and hydraulic safety margins (for example, HSM50) are important predictors of drought-induced mortality risk3–5, little is known about how these vary across Earth’s largest tropical forest. Here, we present a pan-Amazon, fully standardized hydraulic traits dataset and use it to assess regional variation in drought sensitivity and hydraulic trait ability to predict species distributions and long-term forest biomass accumulation. Parameters $$\varPsi $$ Ψ 50 and HSM50 vary markedly across the Amazon and are related to average long-term rainfall characteristics. Both $$\varPsi $$ Ψ 50 and HSM50 influence the biogeographical distribution of Amazon tree species. However, HSM50 was the only significant predictor of observed decadal-scale changes in forest biomass. Old-growth forests with wide HSM50 are gaining more biomass than are low HSM50 forests. We propose that this may be associated with a growth–mortality trade-off whereby trees in forests consisting of fast-growing species take greater hydraulic risks and face greater mortality risk. Moreover, in regions of more pronounced climatic change, we find evidence that forests are losing biomass, suggesting that species in these regions may be operating beyond their hydraulic limits. Continued climate change is likely to further reduce HSM50 in the Amazon6,7, with strong implications for the Amazon carbon sink.

25 February 2016 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LPLuciano Pereira
Luciano Pereira
PBPaulo R. L. Bittencourt
Paulo R. L. Bittencourt
RORafael S. Oliveira
Rafael S. Oliveira
MJMauro B. M. Junior
Mauro B. M. Junior
FBFernanda V. Barros
Fernanda V. Barros
PMPaulo Mazzafera
Paulo Mazzafera

24 June 2017 in Trees
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LPLuciano Pereira
Luciano Pereira
ADAdilson P. Domingues-Junior
Adilson P. Domingues-Junior
SJSteven Jansen
Steven Jansen
BCBrendan Choat
Brendan Choat
PMPaulo Mazzafera
Paulo Mazzafera