Significant sex-based differences exist in the immune system and antitumor immune responses, potentially leading to variations in both the efficacy and toxicity of anticancer immunotherapies. Women generally mount stronger innate and adaptive immune responses than men, which can result in more severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs) during treatments with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, the importance of sex dimorphism in the safety of cancer immunotherapy remains underexplored in clinical oncology, despite its profound implications for treatment outcomes. Our review highlights the critical influence of biological sex on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immune responses, shaping ICI efficacy and the prevalence, type, and severity of irAEs. Integrating sex as a critical variable in cancer treatment and clinical trial design is essential for personalizing therapeutic strategies, bridging existing knowledge gaps, and enhancing survival rates and quality of life for patients across genders.

Visceral crisis is a life-threatening clinical condition requiring urgent treatment and accounts for 10–15% of new advanced breast cancer diagnoses, mainly hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor 2 negative. As its clinical definition is an open topic with nebulous criteria and much room for subjective interpretation, it poses a challenge for daily clinical practice. International guidelines recommend combined chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with visceral crisis, but with modest results and a very poor prognosis. Visceral crisis has always been a common exclusion criterion in breast cancer trials, and the available evidence mainly comes from limited retrospective studies which are not sufficient to draw solid conclusions. The outstanding efficacy of innovative drugs, such as CDK4/6 inhibitors, questions the role of chemotherapy in this setting. In the lack of clinical reviews, we aim to critically discuss the management of visceral crisis, advocating future treatment perspectives for this challenging condition.

Modern healthcare is experiencing a significant transformation, utilizing technology to improve patient outcomes and make processes more efficient. Breast cancer, being the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women globally, requires innovative approaches for effective management. Digital Therapeutics (DTx) and Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) have emerged as pivotal technologies, offering personalized, patient-centered care and optimizing clinical decision-making. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the applications, benefits, and challenges of these digital tools in breast cancer treatment. We examine DTx tools’ ability to offer real-time symptom monitoring, treatment adherence, psychological support, and lifestyle modification guidance. Simultaneously, the role of CDSSs in providing personalized treatment recommendations, early detection, data analysis, and enhancing multidisciplinary collaborations is evaluated. The challenges of implementing these technologies, such as data privacy, interoperability, and accessibility are also discussed, along with potential solutions. By exploring the current research findings, the review underscores the significant impact of DTx and CDSSs on patient outcomes, treatment efficiency, and overall quality of life. This manuscript concludes with a forward-looking perspective, emphasizing the importance of collaborative efforts to overcome obstacles and unlock the full potential of digital innovations in breast cancer oncology. Our analysis suggests that adopting these digital tools can lead to more holistic, efficient, and patient-centric cancer care, marking a significant shift in the paradigm of breast cancer management.

Based on the unprecedented results observed in recent clinical trials, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have revolutionized the treatment algorithm of metastatic breast cancer (mBC). The strategy of sequencing different ADCs in other lines of therapy is highly attractive, but the proportion of patients who have undergone such a strategy in the context of published clinical trials is still limited, especially for modern ADCs. HER2-positive disease is primarily managed with a sequence of different ADCs. Historically, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) has been the most commonly used ADC for both early and metastatic HER2-positive disease. Considering the recent evidence related to trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), it is expected to assume the role of the main ADC in our clinical practice. Herein, we report a retrospective analysis of the sequence of different ADCs relying on available published data from clinical trials.

Recently, circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as potential non-invasive biomarkers for breast cancer (BC) management. In the context of BC patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), the possibility of obtaining repeated, non-invasive biological samples from patients before, during, and after treatment is incredibly convenient and provides the opportunity to investigate circulating miRNAs as diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic tools. The present review aims to summarize major findings in this setting, thus highlighting their potential applicability in daily clinical practice and their possible limitations. In all the contexts (diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic), circulating miR-21-5p and miR-34a-5p have emerged as the most promising non-invasive biomarkers for BC patients undergoing NAC. Specifically, their high baseline level could discriminate between BC patients and healthy controls. On the other hand, in predictive and prognostic investigations, low circulating miR-21-5p and miR-34a-5p levels may identify patients with better outcomes, in terms of both treatment response and invasive disease-free survival. However, the findings in this field have been very heterogeneous. Indeed, pre-analytical and analytical variables, as well as factors related to patients, may explain the inconsistency among different study results. Thus, further clinical trials, with more precise patient inclusion criteria and more standardized methodological approaches, are definitely needed to better define the potential role of these promising non-invasive biomarkers.

The potential role of circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) as biomarkers in breast cancer (BC) management has been widely reported. However, the numerous discrepancies between studies in this regard hinders the implementation of circulating miRNAs in routine clinical practice. In the context of BC patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), the possibility of predicting NAC response may lead to prognostic improvements by individualizing post-neoadjuvant therapy. In this context, the present meta-analysis aims to clarify circulating miRNAs’ predictive role with respect to NAC response among BC patients. We conducted a comprehensive literature search on five medical databases until 16 February 2023. We pooled the effect sizes of each study by applying a random-effects model. Cochran’s Q test (p-level of significance set at 0.05) scores and I² values were assessed to determine between-study heterogeneity. The PROBAST (Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool) tool was used to evaluate the selected studies’ risk of bias. Overall, our findings support the hypothesis that circulating miRNAs, specifically miR-21-5p and miR-155-5p, may act as predictive biomarkers in the neoadjuvant setting among BC patients. However, due to the limited number of studies included in this meta-analysis and the high degrees of clinical and statistical heterogeneity, further research is required to confirm the predictive power of circulating miR-21-5p and miR-155-5p.