Significant sex-based differences exist in the immune system and antitumor immune responses, potentially leading to variations in both the efficacy and toxicity of anticancer immunotherapies. Women generally mount stronger innate and adaptive immune responses than men, which can result in more severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs) during treatments with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, the importance of sex dimorphism in the safety of cancer immunotherapy remains underexplored in clinical oncology, despite its profound implications for treatment outcomes. Our review highlights the critical influence of biological sex on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immune responses, shaping ICI efficacy and the prevalence, type, and severity of irAEs. Integrating sex as a critical variable in cancer treatment and clinical trial design is essential for personalizing therapeutic strategies, bridging existing knowledge gaps, and enhancing survival rates and quality of life for patients across genders.

The outcome of patients with metastatic tumors who discontinued immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) not for progressive disease (PD) has been poorly explored. We performed a meta-analysis of all studies reporting the clinical outcome of patients who discontinued ICIs for reasons other than PD. We searched PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases, from the inception of each database to December 2023, for clinical trials (randomized or not) and observational studies assessing PD-(L)1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors in patients with metastatic solid tumors who discontinued treatment for reasons other than PD. Each study had to provide swimmer plots or Kaplan-Meier survival curves enabling the reconstruction of individual patient-level data on progression-free survival (PFS) following the discontinuation of immunotherapy. The primary endpoint was PFS from the date of treatment discontinuation overall and according to tumor histotype, type of treatment and reason of discontinuation. The Combersure's method was used to estimate meta-analytical non-parametric summary survival curves assuming random effects at study level. Thirty-six studies (2180 patients) were included. The pooled median PFS (mPFS) was 24.7 months (95% CI, 18.8-30.6) and the PFS-rate at 12, 24, and 36 months was respectively 69.8% (95% CI, 63.1-77.3), 51.0% (95% CI, 43.4-59.8) and 34.0% (95% CI, 27.0-42.9). Univariable analysis showed that the mPFS was significantly longer for patients with melanoma (43.0 months), as compared with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, 13.5 months) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC, 10.0 months; between-strata comparison test p-value < 0.001); for patients treated with anti-PD-(L)1 + anti-CTLA-4 as compared with anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy (44.6 versus 19.9 months; p-value < 0.001), and in NSCLC when the reason of treatment discontinuation was elective as compared with toxicity onset (19.6 versus 4.8 months; p-value = 0.003). The multivariable analysis confirmed these differences. The long-term outcome of patients who stopped ICIs for reasons other than PD was substantially affected by clinicopathological features: PFS after treatment discontinuation was longer in patients with melanoma, and/or treated with anti-PD-(L)1 + anti-CTLA-4, and shorter in patients with RCC or in those patients with NSCLC who stopped treatment for toxicity onset. The Italian Ministry of University and Research (PRIN 2022Y7HHNW).

Backgrounds: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is a cornerstone in the management of breast cancer (BC), enabling tumor downstaging and improved surgical options. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 607 BC patients treated with NAT and surgery at IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy, to compare long-term oncologic outcomes of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) versus mastectomy. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment details were analyzed using descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Of the 607 patients, 54.7% underwent BCS, and 45.3% had mastectomy. BCS was associated with significantly superior 10-year outcomes compared to mastectomy, including disease-free survival (DFS, 75.2% vs. 71.1%, p = 0.001), distant DFS (75.2% vs. 71.1%, p = 0.001), overall survival (OS, 82.9% vs. 78.1%, p = 0.002), and BC-specific survival (BCSS, 87.7% vs. 83.1%, p = 0.001). Pathologic complete response (pCR) emerged as a protective factor across all endpoints, while mastectomy was independently associated with worse BCSS (HR: 2.068, 95% CI: 1.016–4.210, p = 0.045). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate the oncologic safety and potential superiority of BCS over mastectomy in NAT-treated BC patients, highlighting the importance of individualized surgical decision-making to optimize survival outcomes.

Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) plays a crucial role in breast cancer (BC) management by enabling tumor and nodal downstaging. While axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains the standard for patients with residual nodal disease after NAT, its prognostic benefit is debated. Identifying predictors of high-burden residual axillary disease may guide treatment intensification and surgical de-escalation strategies. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 262 BC patients treated with NAT followed by ALND between 2006 and 2023. Patients were stratified into low- (ypN0-mi-1) and high-burden (ypN2-3) residual axillary disease groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of high-burden residual disease. Results: High-burden residual axillary disease was observed in 35.9% of patients. Baseline cN+ status (OR = 7.697, p = 0.013), HR+/HER2− subtype (OR = 3.945, p = 0.003), and larger post-NAT tumor size (OR = 1.043, p < 0.001) were independent predictors. Conclusions: Identifying patients at risk of high-burden residual axillary disease is essential to optimize neoadjuvant strategies. Increasing axillary pathological complete response may reduce the need for ALND, minimizing surgical morbidity without compromising oncological outcomes.

The NATALEE trial expanded the use of adjuvant cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors beyond the MonarchE trial’s criteria for early breast cancer (eBC). We conducted a retrospective analysis comparing a large real-world (RW) cohort of 762 consecutive eBC patients with those enrolled in the NATALEE and MonarchE randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate differences in eligibility. Our analysis revealed that 41.7% of RW patients met NATALEE’s eligibility criteria, significantly more than the 21.8% who met MonarchE’s criteria, reflecting NATALEE’s broader indication. Real-world patients were older, had less advanced tumors, and were less likely to be treated with adjuvant chemotherapy compared to the RCT populations. None of the RW patients was deemed eligible for ribociclib based solely on high genomic risk. These findings underscore significant differences in clinical characteristics and potential treatment eligibility, highlighting the need for critical assessment of RCTs results in clinical practice.