Summary: 1. Agricultural intensification, at field and landscape scales, has caused a decrease in weed richness and changes in species composition. In order to prevent this loss of diversity and develop efficient management regimes, it is important to understand how both aspects of intensification affect plant diversity and the way in which they interact. 2. This study assessed plant diversity at the centre, edges and boundaries of 29 organic and 29 conventional cereal fields distributed in 15 agrarian localities of the NE Iberian Peninsula. We focused on the composition of plant assemblages and on the specific richness at the field level, which was calculated for the whole set of species and for that of characteristic arable weeds. The percentage of arable land together with human settlements was used as a surrogate for landscape complexity and the amount of nitrogen inputs for land‐use intensity. 3. Our results show that both scales of agricultural intensification have a similar negative effect on the total plant species and characteristic arable weed richness, and they also affect plant assemblages. Furthermore, we found no strong interaction between landscape and land‐use intensity for explaining total plant richness. 4. The relative importance of farming intensity and landscape varies depending on the location within the field, which can be attributed to differences in the agricultural impact and limited seed dispersal from adjacent habitats. Management is the main factor in explaining differences among field centres, whereas changes at boundaries are mainly due to landscape characteristics, and at edges both factors are relevant. 5. Synthesis and applications. To preserve agricultural plant diversity it is equally important to prevent agricultural intensification at field and landscape scales. Policies enhancing low‐intensity management techniques, such as organic farming, are the main way to promote diversity inside the fields and will be equally beneficial in simple and complex landscapes for total plant species richness. To maintain diversity within agricultural areas, it is also important to reduce farming intensity at the edges, which would favour characteristic arable weeds and margins’ overall plant diversity.

Summary: When a plant species is introduced into a new range, it may differentiate genetically from the original populations in the home range. This genetic differentiation may influence the extent to which the invasion of the new range is successful. We tested this hypothesis by examining Senecio pterophorus, a South African shrub that was introduced into NE Spain about 40 years ago. We predicted that in the introduced range invasive populations would perform better and show greater plasticity than native populations. Individuals of S. pterophorus from four Spanish (invasive) and four South African (native) populations were grown in Catalonia, Spain, in a common garden in which disturbance and water availability were manipulated. Fitness traits and several ecophysiological parameters were measured. The invasive populations of S. pterophorus survived better throughout the summer drought in a disturbed (unvegetated) environment than native South African populations. This success may be attributable to the lower specific leaf area (SLA) and better water content regulation of the invasive populations in this treatment. Invasive populations displayed up to three times higher relative growth rate than native populations under conditions of disturbance and non‐limiting water availability. The reproductive performance of the invasive populations was higher in all treatments except under the most stressful conditions (i.e. in non‐watered undisturbed plots), where no plant from either population flowered. The results for leaf parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements suggested that the greater fitness of the invasive populations could be attributed to more favourable ecophysiological responses. Synthesis. Spanish invasive populations of S. pterophorus performed better in the presence of high levels of disturbance, and displayed higher plasticity of fitness traits in response to resource availability than native South African populations. Our results suggest that genetic differentiation from source populations associated with founding may play a role in invasion success.

The interest of organic farmers in adopting conservation agriculture principles, including minimal soil disturbance, permanent soil cover and crop rotation has been growing since the early 2000s. However, currently there is no network for organic farmers practicing conservation agriculture, and a lack of knowledge on how organic farmers implement conservation agriculture in practice. Consequently, few technical references are available for organic farmers when they start applying conservation agriculture practices, in particular on controlling weeds without the use of herbicides. The main objectives of this study were: (1) to explore the diversity of conservation agriculture techniques (i.e., reduced tillage, no-tillage and green manures) practiced among European farmers, and (2) to identify farmers’ main strategies for implementing conservation agriculture and the agronomic and environmental factors that determine these strategies. Strategies were identified by analyzing survey results on: (1) the type and degree of use of conservation agriculture practices by farmers, and (2) the effects it produces in terms of soil disturbance and soil cover (low, medium and high). We carried out a survey of 159 European organic farmers and collected 125 data sets on management of winter-sown crops. Among the conservation agriculture practices, reduced tillage was used by 89%, no-tillage by 27% and green manure by 74% of the 159 interviewed farmers. Green manures were more frequently used in northern Europe than in the south (below 45°N). Most of the farmers used crop rotations, with a mean duration of 6 years. A wide diversity of conservation agriculture practices were used, with farmers rarely using all three techniques (no-till, reduced till and green manures) within one system. The range of practices was grouped into five strategies ranging from intensive non-inversion tillage without soil cover to very innovative techniques with no-tillage and intercrops. The five strategies for conservation agriculture could be grouped into two larger categories based on weed control approach: (1) intensification of the mechanical work without soil inversion or (2) biological regulation of weeds with cover crops. The diversity of strategies identified in this study shows that organic farmers use innovative approaches to implement conservation agriculture without herbicides. This study's findings will help organic farmers to experiment with innovative practices based on conservation agriculture principles and also benefit conventional farmers who use conservation agriculture practices and would like to reduce or eliminate the use of herbicides.