Climate change has increased the susceptibility of forest ecosystems, resulting in escalated forest decline globally. As one of the largest forest biomasses in the Northern Hemisphere, the Eurasian boreal forests are subjected to frequent drought, windthrow, and high-temperature disturbances. Over the last century, bark beetle outbreaks have emerged as a major biotic threat to these forests, resulting in extensive tree mortality. Despite implementing various management strategies to mitigate the bark beetle populations and reduce tree mortality, none have been effective. Moreover, altered disturbance regimes due to changing climate have facilitated the success of bark beetle attacks with shorter and multivoltine life cycles, consequently inciting more frequent bark beetle-caused tree mortality. This review explores bark beetle population dynamics in the context of climate change, forest stand dynamics, and various forest management strategies. Additionally, it examines recent advancements like remote sensing and canine detection of infested trees and focuses on cutting-edge molecular approaches including RNAi-nanoparticle complexes, RNAi-symbiotic microbes, sterile insect technique, and CRISPR/Cas9-based methods. These diverse novel strategies have the potential to effectively address the challenges associated with managing bark beetles and improving forest health in response to the changing climate.

Climate change-related acute or long-term drought stress can weaken forest ecosystems and result in widespread bark beetle infestations. Eurasian spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus L.) infestations have been occurring in Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.]-dominated forests in central Europe including the Czechia. These infestations appear regularly, especially in homogeneous spruce stands, and the impact varies with the climate-induced water stress conditions. The removal of infected trees before the beetles leave the bark is an important step in forest pest management. Early identification of susceptible trees to infestations is also very important but quite challenging since stressed tree-tops show no sign of discolouration in the visible spectrum. We investigated if individual spectral bandwidths or developed spectral vegetation indices (SVIs), can be used to differentiate non-attacked trees, assumed to be healthy, from trees susceptible to attacks in the later stages of a growing season. And, how the temporal-scale patterns of individual bands and developed SVIs of susceptible trees to attacks, driven by changes in spectral characteristics of trees, behave differently than those patterns observed for healthy trees. The multispectral imagery from the PlanetScope satellite coupled with field data were used to statistically test the competency of the individual band and/or developed SVIs to differentiate two designated classes of healthy and susceptible trees. We found significant differences between SVIs of the susceptible and healthy spruce forests using the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) and Visible Atmospherically Resistant Index (VARI). The accuracy for both indices ranged from 0.7 to 0.78; the highest among all examined indices. The results indicated that the spectral differences between the healthy and susceptible trees were present at the beginning of the growing season before the attacks. The existing spectral differences, likely caused by water-stress stimuli such as droughts, may be a key to detecting forests susceptible to early infestations. Our introduced methodology can also be applied in future research, using new generations of the PlanetScope imagery, to assess forests susceptibility to bark beetle infestations early in the growing season.

Tree-killing bark beetles require rapid management, such as anti-attractants, to stop the enlargement of attack hot-spots. We tested two newer anti-attractant blends, both without verbenone and one with the addition of trans-4-thujanol, in traps against standard pheromone baits for inhibition of catch. Both blends provided effective catch reduction (>95%). We also tested these anti-attractant blends in tree protection experiments for two years. We had experimental plots with a center of an anti-attractant protected tree zone, with no traditional control area, but we followed tree kills in 10 m wide concentric rings to 100 m. In 2020, we had 12 plots, and 9 plots in 2021. Monitoring by low-strength pheromone traps followed beetle flight averaging 300/trap during the shorter period, August 2020, and 5000/trap during the longer period, May to August 2021. The blends of anti-attractants were 100% effective in avoiding tree mortality in both treated trees and their surroundings. There were no bark beetle attacks on any treated trees, and there was zero tree mortality up to 19 m in 2020, and up to 30 m in 2021, thus full protection to circa 20 m. The density of killed trees then increased from close to zero, over 20 to 50 m, reaching a level of ca 30 (trees/ha) then declined. The spatial pattern of tree mortality on our experimental plots was highly heterogeneous and individual 10m-ring data points on tree kill density could not be statistically separated. In contrast, a non-linear regression model showed a continuous increase of attacks over the distance from the center to a peak ca 60m, followed by a decline. This model agrees partly with the only similar study in the literature, but importantly, it does not give a peak of kill density at distances between the first and second rings close to treatment zones. Such patterns of close-quarter kills have been observed as a “switching” of attack in this and other scolytid systems manipulated by anti-attractants, but not in the present study, likely due to the elimination of verbenone from our blends.

Establishing an optimum range of inter-species spacing that reduces competition among trees and mitigates the effects of drought is a critical yet complex challenge in forest management. Stand density plays a crucial role in forest functioning by regulating resource allocation within individual trees. Higher stand densities have been shown to reduce sap velocities, indicating intensified competition for water and other resources. However, determining the precise spacing that minimizes competition while maintaining ecosystem balance remains unclear. In this study, conducted in temperate Norway spruce forests at an altitude range of 400–500 m in the Czech Republic, we propose a novel technique to define tree spacing that reduces competitive interactions. We used xylem sap flow residuals of an ordinary least square (OLS) regression model to filter out the effects of elevation and diameter at breast height (DBH) on field-measured sap flow for 101 planted Norway spruce trees with a DBH range of 40 ± 5 cm (≈90–100 years old). The model residuals allowed us to account for the most important driver of sap flow variability: tree density and its underlying effects on individual tree traits. To minimize the confounding effects of temporal and spatial variability, we used twelve consecutive daily measurements of sap flow (6 a.m. to 6 p.m.) taken at the start of the growing season. By constructing an experimental variogram, we quantified sap flow variability as a function of tree spacing. The results showed a steady sap flow pattern at tree densities of 12, 11, and 10 trees per 314 m² (equivalent to 350 ± 32 trees per hectare), corresponding to inter-tree spacing measurements of 5.12 m, 5.34 m, and 5.60 m, respectively. These findings suggest that when the N number of trees (median) per unit area (A) is in equilibrium with resource availability, increasing or decreasing the n number of trees may not significantly change competition levels (A; f(A) = N ± n). The size or deviation of n depends on the area to define the minimum and maximum thresholds or tolerance capacity for the number of trees allowed to be in the area. This technique—using a variogram of sap flow residuals to determine tree spacing—can be periodically applied, such as every 10–15 years, and adapted for different elevation gradients (e.g., within 100 m intervals). It offers a practical tool for forest managers and policymakers, guiding thinning and planting strategies to enhance forest resilience in the face of water-stress conditions.