Leonardo Aquino

Ms. Leonardo Aquino

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 June 2020 in Biopreservation and Biobanking
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CCCibelle A.S. Costa
Cibelle A.S. Costa
ABAlana A. Borges
Alana A. Borges
MNMatheus B. Nascimento
Matheus B. Nascimento
LALeonardo Aquino
Leonardo Aquino
Alexandre Rodrigues SilvaAlexandre Rodrigues Silva
Alexandre Rodrigues Silva
APAlexsandra Fernandes Pereira
Alexsandra Fernandes Pereira
The cryobanks of agouti somatic tissues represent a promising tool for the conservation of this species and of those that are phylogenetically related and endangered. For these purposes, one strategy to guarantee the quality of samples after warming would be to choose the appropriate tissue vitrification technique. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of two different techniques, direct vitrification in cryovials (DVC) and solid-surface vitrification (SSV), on the preservation of ear somatic tissues derived from agoutis kept in a scientific center of creation. Noncryopreserved somatic tissues were used as controls. Although SSV reduced the thickness of the dermis and cartilage ( p < 0.05), the epidermal thickness of these samples was observed to be similar to controls ( p > 0.05). Notably, the number of fibroblasts was not altered with either technique. However, both vitrification methods led to an increase in the number of perinuclear halos, with a particularly strong increase observed in DVC-derived fragments ( p < 0.05). Compared with the DVC group, SSV showed a larger number of normal chondrocytes and smaller number of degenerate chondrocytes. Furthermore, the number of empty lacunae in SSV-derived fragments remained similar to controls ( p > 0.05). In summary, SSV was found to be a more efficient method for vitrifying agouti somatic tissues compared with DVC. These results are important for the proper formation of agouti somatic banks, an essential step in the study of biological resources in this species.

11 June 2023 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSmaria valéria de oliveira santos
maria valéria de oliveira santos
ASAndreia Silva
Andreia Silva
LALeonardo Aquino
Leonardo Aquino
LOLhara R. M. Oliveira
Lhara R. M. Oliveira
SMSamara Sandy Jerônimo Moreira
Samara Sandy Jerônimo Moreira
APAlexsandra Fernandes Pereira
Alexsandra Fernandes Pereira
Methods for seminal plasma (SP) removal and the selection of collared peccary sperm for fertilization were compared. The experiments evaluated the following: the (I) impact of centrifugation for SP removal before swim-up for sperm selection and (II) a comparison of different Percoll® gradient densities (PG 45–90% and PG 35–70%). Non-selected sperm served as the control. Sperm quality was assessed based on motility patterns, morphology, membrane functional integrity, viability, reactive oxygen species (ROS), glutathione (GSH), and DNA integrity. Subsequently, the most successful group in the previous experiment and washing by centrifugation (WC) were compared for motility patterns and fertilization using pig oocytes. Swim-up decreased motility and enhanced ROS compared to the control. Centrifugation before swim-up harmed integrity and viability compared to the control. PG 45–90% (96.8 vs. 69.7 vs. 40.7 µm/s) allowed for a better velocity average pathway (VAP), a better velocity straight line, and better linearity (LIN) than those of the control and PG 35–70% (88.4 vs. 56.0 vs. 27.3 µm/s). Thus, PG 45–90% was used for fertilization. PG 45–90% obtained a higher VAP, a higher amplitude of the lateral head, straightness, and higher LIN than those of the control and WC. Cleavage (25.2–26.3%) and morula (8.1–10.5%) rates did not differ between the groups. Therefore, PG 45–90% and WC were efficient in isolating collared peccary sperm capable of fertilizing pig oocytes.

1 August 2021 in Cryobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GLGabriela Pereira de Oliveira Lira
Gabriela Pereira de Oliveira Lira
ABAlana Azevedo Borges
Alana Azevedo Borges
MNMatheus Barbosa Do Nascimento
Matheus Barbosa Do Nascimento
LALeonardo Aquino
Leonardo Aquino
LMLuiz Fernando de Medeiros Paiva Moura
Luiz Fernando de Medeiros Paiva Moura
APAlexsandra Fernandes Pereira
Alexsandra Fernandes Pereira

21 August 2023 in Reproduction in Domestic Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ÉPÉrika A. Praxedes
Érika A. Praxedes
MSmaria valéria de oliveira santos
maria valéria de oliveira santos
LOLhara Ricarliany M. de Oliveira
Lhara Ricarliany M. de Oliveira
LALeonardo Aquino
Leonardo Aquino
MOMoacir F. de Oliveira
Moacir F. de Oliveira
APAlexsandra Fernandes Pereira
Alexsandra Fernandes Pereira

19 March 2021 in Zoo Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMaria D. C. B. Santos
Maria D. C. B. Santos
LALeonardo Aquino
Leonardo Aquino
MNMatheus B. Nascimento
Matheus B. Nascimento
MSMaria B. Silva
Maria B. Silva
LRLuanna L. V. Rodrigues
Luanna L. V. Rodrigues
APAlexsandra Fernandes Pereira
Alexsandra Fernandes Pereira

26 July 2024 in Acta Histochemica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LALeonardo Aquino
Leonardo Aquino
SOSamara Lima Olindo
Samara Lima Olindo
YSYARA LETICIA FRUTUOSO E SILVA
YARA LETICIA FRUTUOSO E SILVA
LOLhara Ricarliany Medeiros de Oliveira
Lhara Ricarliany Medeiros de Oliveira
YMYasmin Beatriz França Moura
Yasmin Beatriz França Moura
APAlexsandra Fernandes Pereira
Alexsandra Fernandes Pereira