H.B.T.P Jayathilaka

Mrs. H.B.T.P Jayathilaka

College of Geograpghical Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 June 2024 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YFYuke Feng
Yuke Feng
SZShiyan Zhai
Shiyan Zhai
GSGenxin Song
Genxin Song
Hongquan SongHongquan Song
Hongquan Song
GDGuanpeng Dong
Guanpeng Dong
H.B.T.P JayathilakaH.B.T.P Jayathilaka
H.B.T.P Jayathilaka

26 March 2025 in Transactions in GIS
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CDChangchang Dong
Changchang Dong
SZShiyan Zhai
Shiyan Zhai
YKYunfeng Kong
Yunfeng Kong
YFYuke Feng
Yuke Feng
JHJiahui Han
Jiahui Han
H.B.T.P JayathilakaH.B.T.P Jayathilaka
H.B.T.P Jayathilaka

23 September 2026 in Sustainable Futures
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
H.B.T.P JayathilakaH.B.T.P Jayathilaka
H.B.T.P Jayathilaka
SZShiyan Zhai
Shiyan Zhai
YFYuke Feng
Yuke Feng

4 October 2026 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
H.B.T.P JayathilakaH.B.T.P Jayathilaka
H.B.T.P Jayathilaka
SZShiyan Zhai
Shiyan Zhai
Baye T. GetahunBaye T. Getahun
Baye T. Getahun
SWSandamali Wijeratne
Sandamali Wijeratne
YFYuke Feng
Yuke Feng
CDChangchang Dong
Changchang Dong
Digital Agricultural Technology (DAT) adoption remains poorly understood in climate-vulnerable tropical islands. To address this gap, this study examines how demand, supply, and environmental dimensions interact to shape farmers’ adoption decisions, applying the extended Theory of Planned Behavior. The data were collected from 400 farmers selected randomly in the Anuradhapura District, Sri Lanka, using a structured questionnaire. The analyses were conducted a Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Model. Four behavioral segments were identified: confident adopters (29.5%), utility-driven emerging adopters (42%), uncertain users (20.5%), and skeptical users (8%). Climate change awareness (β = 0.712), attitude (β = 0.297), social norms (β = 0.197), perceived behavioral control (β = 0.130), perceived usefulness (β = 0.162), access to infrastructure (β = 0.098), and risk aversion (β = 0.142) positively influenced farmers’ intention toward DAT. Climate change awareness strongly influenced attitudes, highlighting the central role of environmental dimensions. Institutional support had no significant effect. Behavioral intention and actual adoption (β = 0.575) influenced the willingness to continue DAT. Policymakers should move from ‘one-size-fits-all’ digital extensions to segment-specific interventions: peer-led networks for confident adopters, subsidies for utility-driven farmers, social learning for uncertain users, and in-person training for skeptical users. The study provides context-specific evidence that demonstrates how behavior shapes farmers’ adoption pathways under climate change, addressing SDGs 1, 2, 9, 12, 13, and 15.

15 September 2026 in International Journal of Sustainable Development & Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
H.B.T.P JayathilakaH.B.T.P Jayathilaka
H.B.T.P Jayathilaka
KRKithsiri Bandaralage Indunil Sandaruwan Ranwella
Kithsiri Bandaralage Indunil Sandaruwan Ranwella
Sustainable Development (SD) and climate change are characterized by a dynamic and interdependent relationship, and SD plays an important role in protecting the environment and addressing climate change challenges. Although the substantial literature has focused on these themes individually, there is a gap in attention between an integrated review of sustainable development and climate change. This study aims to map the global literature landscape on integrating SD and climate change, using 881 documents from the Web of Science Core Collection Database, and using the PRISMA framework. An analysis was conducted using RStudio (bibliometrix tool) and VOSviewer to identify research trends, progress, future directions, spatial disparities, and collaboration networks. Findings underscored that the dominant document type was journal articles (68%) and that the Chinese Academy of Sciences was the highest-performing institution. “Renewable energy”, “environment, “sustainable development, “sustainable development goals, “adaptation,” and “mitigation” themes were the most influential and frequently discussed themes. The temporal development of this nexus progressed from early adaptation-focused studies (2000-2007) to a policy- and governance-emphasis (2008-2016) and toward a sustainability-integrated approach (2017-2023). The USA, the UK, and China were the leading countries in terms of the number of published documents and collaborations. The conclusion reveals significant spatial disparities, especially in lower performance in developing countries, and a disconnected knowledge structure. The results imply the need for attention to policies, technologies, and knowledge that can be supported through interdisciplinary collaboration, funding, and multilingual publishing. Moreover, future studies should emphasize regional integration, policy, and technology, integrating this domain, to strengthen the role of SD-climate change research.