A newly identified virus appeared in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, was named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and caused the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). SARS-CoV-2 presents similarities with two previous coronavirus pandemics, MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome) and SARSCoV, concerning phylogenetic origin, structural composition, and clinical symptoms, thus, leading to common pathogenic mechanisms. The purpose of this review is to declare the role of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the pathogenesis, prognosis, and treatment of COVID-19 by comparing its effect on SARS-CoV and MERS cases. Increased levels of IL-6 comprise the key for the stimulation of cytokine storm and the progression of SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 cases. Especially, in COVID-19 patients, the overactivation of NF-kΒ, which is caused by the binding of coronavirus spike protein S to alveolar epithelial cells, up-regulates IL-6 and promotes its systematic circulation, causing alveolar damage and extrapulmonary injury. Additionally, IL-6 can be used to evaluate respiratory failure and identify asymptomatic patients. Tocilizumab (TCZ), a monoclonal antibody which blocks IL-6 signaling, comprises a remedial option against COVID-19. TCZ improves oxygenation, reduces fever, and decreases levels of IL-6. IL-6 plays a major role in the pathogenesis of cytokine storm and the progression of COVID-19 and may be used as a therapeutic target against COVID-19. However, further research is needed concerning the relation of IL-6 in COVID-19 cases, and more clinical trials are required to declare TCZ as a treatment option.

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disorder associated with major cardiovascular and neurocognitive sequelae. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the standard treatment for OSA. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and associations of long-term CPAP adherence in newly diagnosed OSA patients. Methods: We enrolled patients who were diagnosed with OSA during the COVID-19 pandemic. Adherence was defined as CPAP use ≥4 h per night on ≥70% of nights over 30 consecutive days. Patient demographics were retrieved from medical records, and CPAP adherence at 6 months and 1 year after initiation was monitored. Results: Overall, 107 patients were included in the analysis. A number of 73 (68%) and 63 (59%) patients were adherent to CPAP treatment at 6 months and 12 months accordingly. Among the factors examined and analyzed (age, gender, BMI, Apnea–Hypopnea Index (AHI)), no significant correlation was found. Further analysis revealed the potential role of comorbidities. CPAP compliance at 6 months was shown to be associated with better CPAP adherence at 12 months. Conclusions: CPAP adherence at 6 months is correlated to long-term adherence to treatment. Therefore, early close follow-up is important. Further prospective studies are needed to identify other potential predictors.

Background: Sedation during flexible bronchoscopy (FB) should maintain an adequate respiratory drive, ensure maximum comfort for the patient, and warrant that the objectives of the procedure are achieved. Nevertheless, the optimal sedation method for FB has yet to be established. This study aimed to compare the standard recommended combination of midazolam-fentanyl (MF) with that of dexmedetomidine-ketamine (DK) for patient sedation during FB. Methods: Patients subjected to FB were randomly assigned to a DK (n = 25) and an MF group (n = 25). The primary outcome was the rate of critical desaturation events (arterial oxygen saturation < 80% with nasal oxygen supply 2 L/min). Secondary outcomes included sedation depth, hemodynamic complications, adverse events, and patient and bronchoscopist satisfaction. Results: The incidence rates of critical desaturation events were similar between the two groups (DK: 12% vs. MF: 28%, p = 0.289). DK achieved deeper maximum sedation levels (higher Ramsay - lower Riker scale; p < 0.001) and was associated with longer recovery times (p < 0.001). Both groups had comparable rates of hemodynamic and other complications. Patient satisfaction was similar between the two groups, but bronchoscopist satisfaction was higher with the DK combination (p = 0.033). Conclusion: DK demonstrated a good safety profile in patients subjected to FB and achieved more profound sedation and better bronchoscopist satisfaction than the standard MF combination without increasing the rate of adverse events.

Working on shifts, especially on a night shift, influences the endogenous sleep regulation system leading to diminished sleep time and increased somnolence. We attempted to evaluate the impact of shifts on sleepiness and correlate the sleepiness score to the experience in a shift schedule.

Background: Real-world data on currently used biologic agents in patients with severe asthma are lacking. Methods: In this retrospective study, we recorded between 16 May 2020 and 31 December 2024 consecutive patients who presented to our asthma outpatient clinic received a diagnosis of uncontrolled severe asthma and were treated with biologic agents. Outcomes included a comparison of disease phenotypic characteristics, as well as asthma control, lung function, longitudinal use of corticosteroids, and hospitalizations due to exacerbations at baseline and post-biologic treatment at 6-month follow-up. Results: We identified 80 patients with uncontrolled severe asthma treated with biologic agents. The median age (95% CI) at the time of diagnosis was 67.0 (61.0 to 70.0) years. Most patients were female (65.0%, n = 52) and never smokers (51.3%, n = 41). The median value of ACT (95% CI) was 15 (15 to 16) at the time of diagnosis. The mean FEV₁% predicted ±SD at the baseline was 68.9 ± 22.0. The median value of blood eosinophils (95% CI) was 365 (252 to 448) K/μL in the overall population. One-third (36.3%) of patients were hospitalized due to severe asthma exacerbation in the previous year. Longitudinal use of oral corticosteroids was recorded in 11.3% of included patients. Three patients (3.8%) were treated with omalizumab, 23 patients (28.8%) with mepolizumab, 33 patients (41.2%) with benralizumab and 21 patients (26.2%) with tezepelumab. The median value of ACT (95% CI) post-biologic treatment at 6-month follow-up was 20 (20 to 21), p < 0.0001. The mean FEV₁% predicted ±SD at 6-month follow-up was 77.6 ± 25.2, p = 0.12. The median value of blood eosinophils (95% CI) 6 months after initiation of biologic treatment was 100 (40 to 121) K/μL, p < 0.0001. Elimination of hospitalizations due to asthma flares was recorded in 97.5% of patients (p < 0.0001). With regard to the longitudinal use of oral corticosteroids, we noticed that 96.2% of patients achieved discontinuation. No treatment-related adverse events were noticed. Conclusions: The administration of current biologic agents in patients with severe asthma seems to be both effective and safe, sparing the toxicity of oral corticosteroids.