Pregnancy is hazardous with pulmonary arterial hypertension, but maternal mortality may have fallen in recent years. We sought to systematically evaluate pulmonary arterial hypertension and pregnancy‐related outcomes in the last decade. We searched for articles describing outcomes in pregnancy cohorts published between 2008 and 2018. A total of 3658 titles were screened and 13 studies included for analysis. Pooled incidences and percentages of maternal and perinatal outcomes were calculated. Results showed that out of 272 pregnancies, 214 pregnancies advanced beyond 20 gestational weeks. The mean maternal age was 28 ± 2 years, mean pulmonary artery systolic pressure on echocardiogram was 76 ± 19 mmHg. Etiologies include idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (22%), congenital heart disease (64%), and others (15%). Majority (74%) had good functional class I/II. Only 48% of women received pulmonary arterial hypertension‐specific therapy. Premature deliveries occur in 58% of pregnancies at mean of 34 ± 1 weeks, most (76%) had Cesarean section. Maternal mortality rate was 12% overall (n = 26); even higher for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension etiology alone (20%). Reported causes of death included right heart failure, cardiac arrest, pulmonary arterial hypertension crises, pre‐eclampsia, and sepsis; 61% of maternal deaths occur at 0–4 days postpartum. Stillbirth rate was 3% and neonatal mortality rate was 1%. In conclusion, pulmonary arterial hypertension in pregnancy continues to be perilous with high maternal mortality rate. Continued prospective studies are needed.

Aims Pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi), defined as [(pulmonary artery systolic pressure − diastolic pulmonary artery pressure)/mean right atrial pressure], is a novel haemodynamic index that predicts right ventricular failure after myocardial infarction and left ventricular assist device implantation. We analysed if a low PAPi is associated with death in our 14 - ​year pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) registry. Methods Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed PAH and complete haemodynamic data were prospectively enrolled into our standing registry between January 2003 and December 2016. PAPi was calculated from baseline invasive right heart catheterization data. A prognostic cut-off value was determined with a decision tree. Baseline characteristics of ‘high’ and ‘low’ PAPi groups based on this cut-off were compared, as well as odds of death and time-to-death. Results One hundred and two patients were included. Mean age was 53 years, and 77% were women. Our multi-ethnic cohort was 64% Chinese, 23% Malay, and 10% Indian. The aetiologies were idiopathic (33%), connective tissue disease (31%), congenital heart disease (24%), and others (12%). The low PAPi group (<5.3) had a greater age (56 years vs. 49 years), lower pulmonary artery systolic pressure (71 mmHg vs. 85 mmHg), and higher mean right atrial pressure (14 mmHg vs. 6 mmHg). Mortality risk was higher in the low PAPi group (adjusted odds ratio: 2.98 and adjusted hazard ratio: 2.23). Mean right atrial pressure was the strongest predictor (hazard ratio 1.114, P = 0.009) when components of PAPi were analysed. Conclusions Pulmonary artery pulsatility index was found to be predictive of mortality in PAH and may be a valuable marker for risk stratification. Its prognostic strength may be driven by mean right atrial pressure.

There is increasing knowledge of sex-specific differences in cardiovascular disease and recognition of sex disparities in management. In our study, we investigated whether a cardiovascular programme tailored to the specific needs of women could lead to improved outcomes. We randomised 100 female patients to receive cardiology follow-up with the conventional sex-neutral cardiac programme (control), or the sex-tailored Women’s Heart Health Programme (intervention). The intervention group was managed by an all-women multidisciplinary team and received culture-centred health intervention workshops, designed through in-depth interviews with the participants. The primary outcome was cardiovascular risk factor improvement at 1 year. Secondary outcomes include cardiovascular event rates, quality of life scores, and self-reported improvement in knowledge, attitudes, intentions and practices. Generalised structural equation model analysis was used to determine if the intervention group had better outcomes at alpha level 0.1. The mean age was 67.3 ± 12.7 years, with an ethnic distribution of 70% Chinese, 18% Malays, and 12% Indians. The majority of these patients had no formal or primary level of education (63%), and were mostly unemployed (78%). Patients in intervention group had better control of diabetes mellitus (lower HbA1c of 0.63% [CI 0.21-1.04], p = 0.015) and lower body-mass-index (0.74 kg/m2 [CI 0.02-1.46], p = 0.092) at 1 year, but there was no significant difference in blood pressure or lipid control. Overall, there was a trend towards better risk factor control, 31.6% of intervention group versus 26.5% of control group achieved improvement in at least 1 CV risk factor control to target range. There was no significant difference in incidence of cardiovascular events, quality of life, or domains in knowledge, attitudes, intention and practices. This pilot study is the first of its kind evaluating a new model of care for women with heart disease. The potential to improve outcomes needs to be studied in a larger trial with longer follow up. This trial was prospectively registered clinicaltrials.gov on 6 May 2013. Trial Number: 2013/00088. Identifier: NCT02017470