Background and Objective Burnout syndrome is well-documented and highly prevalent among healthcare professionals. The literature search found studies mainly aimed at front-line medical specialties, cardiologists, or physicians working in intensive care units. Workload and work conditions favor the occurrence of burnout syndrome among social insurance physicians, with many consequences on health status and a decrease in the quality of their work. We aimed to assess the degree of vulnerability to developing burnout syndrome, factors associated with stress, and coping strategies at social insurance physicians. Materials and Methods: Social insurance physicians working in territorial services for medical assessment of work capacity from Romania participated in the study. An observational study was performed to describe the extent of the exhaustion syndrome among social insurance physicians (SIPhs). Three questionnaires were filled out by the participants: a short version of MBI-HSS to analyze the degree of burnout, an interview with specific questions for the source of stress and Brief-COPE for stress control. Brief demographic data were also collected. Data were statistically analyzed with appropriate tests using PSPP software. Results: Seventy-four physicians were included in the study. Fifty-six were females (75.7%) and twenty-eight (38%) had moderate or high burnout and cognitive distortions with depression resulting as a major side-effect (p < 0.001). Professional factors, mainly deadline pressure (p < 0.001) and high workload (p = 0.012), have emerged as contributing factors to burnout syndrome. Mental disengagement (p = 0.001), active coping (p = 0.006), and acceptance (p = 0.014) would improve stress control. Conclusion: More than two-thirds of social insurance physicians had moderate and high burnout syndrome. The development of strategies to standardize workload was identified as an important action area, along with the long-term preservation of health status and professional performance.

Background: Rare diseases are defined as clinical conditions that affect only a small number of persons in a population, considered fewer than 1 per 2000 in the European Union or fewer than 1 per 1600 in the United States They are serious, often chronic and progressive conditions, characterized by a pronounced clinical polymorphism that crosses all medical specialties. Multiple areas of life beyond just physical health are affected with significant impact on patients, families, and healthcare systems. Objective: To analyze the socio-demographic, medical, and vocational characteristics that correlate with functional status and work disability as a measure of quality of life in rare diseases. Methods: An observational retrospective study of adults with rare diseases evaluated for eligibility for social insurance rights in the National Institute of Medical Assessment and Work Capacity Rehabilitation Bucharest (INEMRCM, the Romanian abbreviation) over a 5-year period was made. Descriptive analysis was used to present sample characteristics. Means and standard deviations (SD) were calculated to describe numerical variables, frequencies were used to describe categorical variables, and logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate potential predictors of work capacity. All statistical analyses were performed by PSPP.3 software. p < 0.05 was the cut-off for statistical significance with a 95% confidence interval. Results: 90 consecutive persons were included in the survey. The mean age of the group was 44.5 years ± SD 10.61 years, with a female/male ratio of 48/42 persons. The mean disease duration was 10.61 years ± SD 9.76 years. Men had more severe disease (73.81%); p = 0.018 and significantly younger retirement age, M/F = 39.10 ± 12.26/43.06 ± 9.32; p = 0.037. Less disabling diseases were predominant autoimmune conditions (85.71% of cases); genetic conditions had a more severe functional impact in 63.75% of cases; p = 0.037. People with multisystem diseases but with specific or targeted treatment can work more frequently (76.19%); those with visual impairment have more severe impairments (73.77%); p < 0.001. All individuals who received specific therapy had a better functional status, unlike only 37.21% of those who received symptomatic treatment or treatment for complications; p = 0.023. Logistic regression analysis indicated that the type of impairment and the availability of specific treatments could serve as predictors of a reduced likelihood of employment in rare disease cases. Education level and occupation were not correlated with functional impairment and work disability (NS). Conclusions: Several factors, including some that are modifiable, were associated with better outcomes, such as reduced disability and an increased potential for work participation. Sex, disease etiology, type of impairment, and treatment were all significantly linked to functional capacity. Among these, the type of impairment and the availability of specific treatments might be predictors of employment. Addressing these parameters requires a multidisciplinary team, involving specialized care and comprehensive support services to improve the overall quality of life of individuals affected by rare diseases.

Background/Objectives: Return to work is an important goal of cardiac rehabilitation, yet individuals recovering from cardiovascular disease often face significant challenges in achieving it. As a result, a significant proportion of individuals with coronary artery disease experience work disability, negatively impacting both their economic well-being and quality of life while imposing a substantial financial burden on society. This less-studied issue is often treated as a secondary outcome in research, resulting in return to work findings that are frequently underreported. As such, this study aimed to identify the factors associated with adequate levels of functional capacity enabling the engagement in professional work and to develop a model for predicting the potential return to work of patients with coronary artery disease. Methods: During 2024, we enrolled 250 consecutive patients with chronic coronary syndrome less than 65 years of age who were referred to the National Institute for Medical Assessment and Work Capacity Rehabilitation (INEMRCM) for medical evaluation to establish eligibility-to-work disability benefits. Patients underwent a revascularization procedure either using PTCA or CABG, with a few having had no revascularization until the moment of assessment. Detailed demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical data were collected via interviews. Logistic regression was used to develop a multivariable model for predicting return to work. Results: Six months after discharge from the INEMRCM, around 20% of participants had returned to work. A better functional status was determinant for individuals’ re-employment (p = 0.026) along with an absence of cardiovascular comorbidities (p = 0.045) and holding a higher-skilled occupation (p = 0.037). The multivariate analysis identified professional specialization and the absence of cardiovascular comorbidities as the strongest predictors of return to work. Conclusions: Cardiac patients with coexisting cardiovascular conditions engaged in less-specialized types of work tend to experience poorer return to work outcomes. As such, individuals in this category should be carefully assessed and prioritized in the development of targeted rehabilitation programs.