Hepadnaviridae is a family of hepatotropic DNA viruses that is divided into the genera orthohepadnavirus of mammals and avihepadnavirus of birds. All members of this family can cause acute and chronic hepatic infection, which in the case of human hepatitis B virus (HBV) constitutes a major global health problem. Although our knowledge about the molecular biology of these highly liver-specific viruses has profoundly increased in the last two decades, the mechanisms of attachment and productive entrance into the differentiated host hepatocytes are still enigmatic. The difficulties in studying hepadnaviral entry were primarily caused by the lack of easily accessible in vitro infection systems. Thus, for more than twenty years, differentiated primary hepatocytes from the respective species were the only in vitro models for both orthohepadnaviruses (e.g. HBV) and avihepadnaviruses (e.g. duck hepatitis B virus [DHBV]). Two important discoveries have been made recently regarding HBV: (1) primary hepatocytes from tree-shrews; i.e., Tupaia belangeri, can be substituted for primary human hepatocytes, and (2) a human hepatoma cell line (HepaRG) was established that gains susceptibility for HBV infection upon induction of differentiation in vitro. A number of potential HBV receptor candidates have been described in the past, but none of them have been confirmed to function as a receptor. For DHBV and probably all other avian hepadnaviruses, carboxypeptidase D (CPD) has been shown to be indispensable for infection, although the exact role of this molecule is still under debate. While still restricted to the use of primary duck hepatocytes (PDH), investigations performed with DHBV provided important general concepts on the first steps of hepadnaviral infection. However, with emerging data obtained from the new HBV infection systems, the hope that DHBV utilizes the same mechanism as HBV only partially held true. Nevertheless, both HBV and DHBV in vitro infection systems will help to: (1) functionally dissect the hepadnaviral entry pathways, (2) perform reverse genetics (e.g. test the fitness of escape mutants), (3) titrate and map neutralizing antibodies, (4) improve current vaccines to combat acute and chronic infections of hepatitis B, and (5) develop entry inhibitors for future clinical applications.

The hepatitis B virus (HBV), family Hepadnaviridae, is one of most relevant human pathogens. HBV origins are enigmatic, and no zoonotic reservoirs are known. Here, we screened 3,080 specimens from 54 bat species representing 11 bat families for hepadnaviral DNA. Ten specimens (0.3%) from Panama and Gabon yielded unique hepadnaviruses in coancestral relation to HBV. Full genome sequencing allowed classification as three putative orthohepadnavirus species based on genome lengths (3,149–3,377 nt), presence of middle HBV surface and X-protein genes, and sequence distance criteria. Hepatic tropism in bats was shown by quantitative PCR and in situ hybridization. Infected livers showed histopathologic changes compatible with hepatitis. Human hepatocytes transfected with all three bat viruses cross-reacted with sera against the HBV core protein, concordant with the phylogenetic relatedness of these hepadnaviruses and HBV. One virus from Uroderma bilobatum, the tent-making bat, cross-reacted with monoclonal antibodies against the HBV antigenicity determining S domain. Up to 18.4% of bat sera contained antibodies against bat hepadnaviruses. Infectious clones were generated to study all three viruses in detail. Hepatitis D virus particles pseudotyped with surface proteins of U. bilobatum HBV, but neither of the other two viruses could infect primary human and Tupaia belangeri hepatocytes. Hepatocyte infection occurred through the human HBV receptor sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide but could not be neutralized by sera from vaccinated humans. Antihepadnaviral treatment using an approved reverse transcriptase inhibitor blocked replication of all bat hepadnaviruses. Our data suggest that bats may have been ancestral sources of primate hepadnaviruses. The observed zoonotic potential might affect concepts aimed at eradicating HBV. Significance Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the prototype hepadnavirus; 40% of humans have current or past infection. In a global investigation of viral diversity in bats, we discovered three unique hepadnavirus species. The relatedness of these viruses to HBV suggests that bats might constitute ancestral sources of primate hepadnaviruses. Infection patterns in bats resembled human infection with HBV. After resurrection from bat tissues, pseudotyped viruses carrying surface proteins of one bat hepadnavirus could infect human liver cells. HBV vaccination is probably not protective against these viruses, but viral replication could be blocked by a reverse transcriptase inhibitor used as an anti-HBV drug in humans. The potential of bat hepadnaviruses to infect humans should be considered in programs aimed at eradicating HBV.

Many parts of the life cycle of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection of hepatocytes have been unravelled, but the attachment and entry process leading to infection is largely unknown. Using primary Tupaia hepatocyte cultures as an in vitro infection system, we determined that HBV uses cell-surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans as low-affinity receptor, because HBV infection was inhibited by heparin (IC50: 5 microg ml(-1)) or other higher-sulfated polymers, but not by lower-sulfated glycosaminoglycans, such as chondroitin sulfate. Pretreatment of primary hepatocytes with heparinase decreased viral binding and inhibited HBV infection completely. Interestingly, after preS1-dependent viral binding at 16 degrees C to the cell surface, subsequent infection could still be inhibited by HBV preS1-lipopeptides, but not by heparin any more, suggesting a shift of the virus to a high-affinity receptor. In summary, we suggest following multistep attachment process: in vivo, HBV is initially trapped within the liver in the space of Dissé by heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Thereafter, HBV binds via its preS1 attachment site and the N-terminal myristic acid to a yet unknown, high-affinity receptor that confers uptake in a yet unknown compartment.

The human liver bile acid transporter Na(+)/taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP) has recently been identified as liver-specific receptor for infection of hepatitis B virus (HBV), which attaches via the myristoylated preS1 (myr-preS1) peptide domain of its large surface protein to NTCP. Since binding of the myr-preS1 peptide to NTCP is an initiating step of HBV infection, we investigated if this process interferes with the physiological bile acid transport function of NTCP. HBV infection, myr-preS1 peptide binding, and bile acid transport assays were performed with primary Tupaia belangeri (PTH) and human (PHH) hepatocytes as well as NTCP-transfected human hepatoma HepG2 cells allowing regulated NTCP expression, in the presence of various bile acids, ezetimibe, and myr-preS1 peptides. The myr-preS1 peptide of HBV inhibited bile acid transport in PTH and PHH as well as in NTCP-expressing HEK293 and HepG2 cells. Inversely, HBV infection of PTH, PHH, and NTCP-transfected HepG2 cells was inhibited in a concentration-dependent manner by taurine and glycine conjugates of cholic acid and ursodeoxycholic acid as well as by ezetimibe. In NTCP-HepG2 cells and PTH, NTCP expression, NTCP transport function, myr-preS1 peptide binding, and HBV infection followed comparable kinetics. Myr-preS1 virus binding to NTCP, necessary for productive HBV infection, interferes with the physiological bile acid transport function of NTCP. Therefore, HBV infection via NTCP may be lockable by NTCP substrates and NTCP-inhibiting drugs. This opens a completely new way for an efficient management of HBV infection by the use of NTCP-directed drugs.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is one of the smallest enveloped DNA viruses and the prototype member of the family of Hepadnaviridae that causes acute and chronic infections of mammals (including human) and birds. HBV has evolved an extreme adaptation and dependency to differentiated hepatocytes of its host. Despite its very limited coding capacity with only four open-reading frames, HBV is able to evade the immune system of the host and persist lifelong within infected hepatocytes. During active replication, HBV produces enormous viral loads in the blood and a massive surplus of subviral surface antigen particles in the serum of infected patients without killing their hepatocytes. Together with the use of a reverse transcriptase during replication, it provides an enormous genetic flexibility for selection of viral mutants upon selective pressure, for example, by the immune system or antiviral therapy. In addition, viral wild-type and mutated genomes are stably archived in the nucleus of the infected hepatocyte in an episomal DNA form that provides independence from cellular replication or integration within the host genome. We are just beginning to understand the delicate molecular and cellular interactions during the HBV replicative cycle within infected hepatocytes, so further studies are urgently needed to provide a better basis for further diagnostic and therapeutic options.