Cristiano Zuccaccia

Cristiano Zuccaccia


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 October 2007 in Chemical Society Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AMAlceo Macchioni
Alceo Macchioni
Gianluca CiancaleoniGianluca Ciancaleoni
Gianluca Ciancaleoni
CZCristiano Zuccaccia
Cristiano Zuccaccia
Daniele ZuccacciaDaniele Zuccaccia
Daniele Zuccaccia
This tutorial review deals with the methodological procedures that can be used to obtain accurate molecular sizes in solution from diffusion NMR spectroscopy. The critical aspects associated with the estimation of the size of molecules from the measured translational self-diffusion coefficient, using the Stokes–Einstein equation, are highlighted and discussed. From a theoretical point of view, it is shown how to take into account the size of the solute with respect to that of the solvent and its non-spherical shape using the appropriate correction factors in the frictional coefficient. From a practical point of view, the advantages of introducing an internal standard in the sample are presented. Initially, non-aggregating systems are considered in an attempt to clarify what hydrodynamic dimensions mean. Successively, aggregating systems are addressed showing how it is possible to understand the aggregation level and derive the thermodynamic parameters for some illustrative aggregation processes.

20 February 2007 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HKHu Kang
Hu Kang
AFAntonio Facchetti
Antonio Facchetti
HJHua Jiang
Hua Jiang
Elena CariatiElena Cariati
Elena Cariati
SRStefania Righetto
Stefania Righetto
TMTobin J. Marks
Tobin J. Marks

14 November 2012 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EMEdoardo Mosconi
Edoardo Mosconi
JYJun-Ho Yum
Jun-Ho Yum
FKFlorian Kessler
Florian Kessler
Carlos Gomez GarciaCarlos Gomez Garcia
Carlos Gomez Garcia
CZCristiano Zuccaccia
Cristiano Zuccaccia
FAFilippo De Angelis
Filippo De Angelis

20 January 2004 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CZCristiano Zuccaccia
Cristiano Zuccaccia
NSNicholas G. Stahl
Nicholas G. Stahl
AMAlceo Macchioni
Alceo Macchioni
MCMing-Chou Chen
Ming-Chou Chen
JRJohn A. Roberts
John A. Roberts
TMTobin J. Marks
Tobin J. Marks

28 October 2010 in Chemical Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASArianna Savini
Arianna Savini
GBGianfranco Bellachioma
Gianfranco Bellachioma
Gianluca CiancaleoniGianluca Ciancaleoni
Gianluca Ciancaleoni
CZCristiano Zuccaccia
Cristiano Zuccaccia
Daniele ZuccacciaDaniele Zuccaccia
Daniele Zuccaccia
AMAlceo Macchioni
Alceo Macchioni
We report on three Ir(III) molecular catalysts for water oxidation: 1, [Cp*Ir(ppy)Cl]; 2, [Cp*Ir(bzpy)NO3]; 3, [Cp*Ir(H2O)3](NO3)2. 2 and 3 are water-soluble and show a long-term activity ca. 2 and 3 times higher than 1. It is remarkable that 3, having the simplest structure, is the catalyst with the highest activity.

10 October 2011 in Green Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASArianna Savini
Arianna Savini
PBPaola Belanzoni
Paola Belanzoni
GBGianfranco Bellachioma
Gianfranco Bellachioma
CZCristiano Zuccaccia
Cristiano Zuccaccia
Daniele ZuccacciaDaniele Zuccaccia
Daniele Zuccaccia
AMAlceo Macchioni
Alceo Macchioni
The activity of three [Cp*IrLn] (Cp* = pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) archetypal catalysts ([Cp*Ir (bpy)Cl]Cl (1, bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine), [Cp*Ir(bzpy)(NO3)] (2, bzpy = 2-benzoylpyridine) and [Cp*Ir(H2O)3](NO3)2 (3)) for water oxidation to molecular oxygen was compared using cerium(IV) ammonium nitrate as a sacrificial oxidant. Kinetic studies were carried out by: i) measuring the depletion of Ce4+ through UV-Vis spectroscopy, ii) directly detecting the evolved oxygen through the Clark electrode and iii) measuring the volume of the evolved oxygen. The kinetics of Ce4+ consumption were zero-order in Ce4+ for catalysts 2 and 3, while they were first-order for 1. The order with respect to catalyst was 1 for 1 and 2 while it was 1.5 for 3. As a consequence, 2 (TOFmax = 14.4 min−1) and 3 (TOFmax = 50.4 min−1) were found to be the most active catalysts at low and high catalyst concentration, respectively, while the performance of 1 (TOFmax = 8.6 min−1) increased with increasing the concentration of Ce4+. 1 and 3 were found to be the most robust catalysts at low (3.1 μM, TON = 1240) and high (7.0 μM, TON = 4042) catalyst concentration, respectively. In situNMR studies were performed under exactly the same conditions of the catalytic experiments. It was observed that Cp* underwent an oxidative degradation, ultimately leading to acetic, formic and glycolic acids. Several Ir-containing intermediates of the degradation process were intercepted and fully characterized in solution through 1D- and 2D-NMR experiments. DFT and NMR studies indicated that the degradation proceeds via an initial double oxidative functionalization of both the quanternary carbon and proton of a Cp* C–CH3 moiety.